Someone help me understand how come a person/entity who merely owns 3.6% of a company has the right to be this aggressive about the future growth and policy-making of the company?
1,065 karma · joined December 2, 2014
Someone help me understand how come a person/entity who merely owns 3.6% of a company has the right to be this aggressive about the future growth and policy-making of the company?
Main justification of IPO IMHO is greedy banks, early investors, and underwriters aiming to cash out a lot on the first day without giving a crap about the company or its employees in general.
It is a welcoming step and a step in right direction. Cut the middle man out.
Would not it be better if HR of your company can be managed by some third party with 100% transparency?
Example: Infosys 25k visas vs Google 4k, Apple 1.6k etc.
http://www.myvisajobs.com/Reports/2017-H1B-Visa-Sponsor.aspx
http://www.myvisajobs.com/Reports/2016-H1B-Visa-Sponsor.aspx
http://www.myvisajobs.com/Reports/2015-H1B-Visa-Sponsor.aspx