6,352 karma · joined July 9, 2011
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=111628
Also, somewhat more recently:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15194123
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14309525
None have much discussion, but there were fewer people here ten years ago, so perhaps the five comments that are there are more valuable.
Then again, maybe not.
For reference, it would be really useful if you actually wrote a blog post or some sort of guide, and then post the link to that. As it is it's annoying to have to copy out the link, then visit, then think "I wonder what this is?"
Your description here is pretty minimal, it would be nice to see an example of what you've actually done with these tools, and why you've chosen them.
Why don't you (assuming you're the author, based on your username and the author's name) either include the definition, or at least give a pointer to a definition that uses the notation you are using?
The result of not doing so is that I've read this and thought: That will be a lot of work to interpret.
Closed it and moved on.
Here's an NxN board with k queens already placed. Is there a way to place another N-k queens so they are all mutually non-attacking?
Most instances will be easy, but current algorithms to solve this are such that for each N, the time taken in the worst case is an exponential function of N.
https://www.ft.com/content/14166898-8b8d-11e7-9084-d0c17942b...
http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/27/technology/new-uber-ceo/
https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/27/breaking-uber-has-selected...
https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/27/16162344/uber-new-ceo-dar...
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/ap-sources-expedi...
http://uk.businessinsider.com/who-is-dara-khosrowshahi-ubers...
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/27/new-uber-ceo.html
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/uber-said-to-pick-expedias-...
http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/silicon-valley-o...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/bluesky/technology/ct-uber-ceo...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/uber-selects-expedia-ceo-dara-k...
https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanmac/uber-names-expedia-ceo-dara...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/08/uber-board-picks...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-28/uber-is-s...
https://qz.com/1063293/ubers-board-selects-expedias-dara-kho...
http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/ubers-chooses-a-surprising-ne...
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/uber-...
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/27/546621735/...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/27/technology/uber-ceo-searc...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-ceo-idUSKCN1B70PD
https://www.forbes.com/sites/miguelhelft/2017/08/27/uber-nam...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/27/former-ge...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/08/28/uber-board-...
https://www.codeinwp.com/blog/transparency-report-30/#3
I was wondering at first how the title could possibly be relevant. It is, it's just not what they lead with, which perhaps annoyed me more than it should.
But it really did annoy me a lot.
The modification wasn't intended to make the title stand out, and it wasn't editorializing, it was deliberately adding information to help you, the reader, know what it was you were clicking through to.
I understand the reasons, but I feel that sometimes the mods revert titles without thinking, and without assessing why it might have been changed. Again, I understand the reasons, and having yet another time sink is perhaps unwelcome, but I'd like to see some way - like the "vouch" mechanism - where altered titles can be accepted.
A good place to start to get a sense of what's going on with this specific paper is this thread, but more particularly, the articles linked from it. One that I think is a great starting point is this one:
https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2017/08/15/norbert-blum...
But you should perhaps start by asking the question you actually want the answer to - it sounds like you didn't. So take a moment, do some reading, then come back with particular questions. They may already be answered, but before you did the outside reading you didn't realise. That's what happens to me.
None of those papers have been accepted as correct, the problem remains open.
There's a gazillion articles describing the context and importance, and I suggest you do a web search for something like "P vs NP and why it's important".
Here's one: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=459
HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1605415
There are languages where you need to process some of what you've done before a later part of the source can be dis-ambiguated. How does that sit with what you've said here?
So I'm curious. If you think this doesn't belong here then I'd appreciate hearing why you think that. Submissions about the original memo and the opinions it contained seemed pretty popular, so I thought that having a reasonably senior woman give a response was equally worth having.
If not, why not?
set_minus A B
... prints every line in A that's not in B. Similarly the others.Fast, clean, command-line, results to be piped to be processed or put into files.
Alternatively, if you want to union files you can just do this:
sort A B | sort -u
If you want to find the intersection: sort <( sort -u A ) <( sort -u B ) \
| uniq -c \
| grep " 2 " \
| sed "s/^ *2 *//"
So all these things are easily done from the command line.Even so, as I said, I can see how some people would want a web-based tool, so thanks for sharing!
*/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_1
2-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_2
4-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_3
6-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_4
8-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_5
10-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_6
12-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_7
14-59/16 * * * * bin/RunJob_8
If that doesn't work for you then tell us why. As it is your problem is underspecified.Also, you say some are more compute intensive - have you actually measured the load and time-to-finish?
Prime numbers and similar techniques can help, it just depends if you actually just want to kludge something together, or do it properly.
One of the reasons I point this out is that I'm using an absolutely bog-standard setup. If I get this, so will other visitors to the site. Net result, this will kill visitor numbers.
It's no problem for me to sort it out, and I'm not bothered by it. If the author wants the muggles to read it, then s/he should be aware of the issues.
That's why I point it out.
Your connection is not secure
The owner of www.tedunangst.com has
configured their web site improperly.
To protect your information from being
stolen, Firefox has not connected to
this web site. Your connection is not secure
The owner of www.tedunangst.com has
configured their web site improperly.
To protect your information from being
stolen, Firefox has not connected to
this web site.