569 karma · joined January 21, 2015
Different people have different experiences. Gatekeeping grief is so massively weird to me. Guidance for the future: instead of one-upping the griever with an IG post about how you are sadder, just show empathy and move on.
You should always care whether your favorite product is sellable to a wide audience.
The argument about click-baity titles is relevant to whether a publisher is small or large. Every large publisher now has a yellow press sub-brand that just pushes out trash with click-baits.
But maybe that's intended, as smaller publishers would suffer the most the large publishers would finally be able to decide what is news and how it's to be distributed.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150725/14510131761/study...
Of course tthey didn't wwant to guarantee Snowdens freedom while here, so that interview never happened and the docs were ignored.
I bet that's going to be the NSAs play here too
The study very likely threw some more statistical tests, controls And models at it, but that's the gist.
Not an unexpected rresult either: personal vehicle use means the car is on the road twice per day, uber twice per passenger and the distance between passengers.
>conspiring and attempting to commit economic espionage and steal trade secrets from multiple U.S. aviation and aerospace companies.
What you are quoting is part of how he went about it.
https://www.techradar.com/news/gdpr-sees-cookies-crumble-on-...
The shutting down of companies is a desired effect, because those are the companies that won't get consent. Data resellers for example that dont provide any advantage tto the user.
We haven't even seen the actual effects yet because google Facebook et al are probably in violation and are waiting to be sued to fight it out in courts
Which philosophers are you referring to? I'd agree with "many" but "most" is an empirical claim I'd not be brave enough to make. Do you perhaps mean to say "economics isn't a natural science"?
Case in point: there is tons of kuhnians running around that think of science as a consent-seeking endeavor with agreed upon principles. They recognise that any hard delineation between say econ not being a science but physics being one, usually kicks out a lot of progress in physics as not scientific. Especially those theoretical physics whose predictions are extremely fruitful bbut where experimental data is out of reach right now.
This is maybe even the point: fewer but enthusiastic customers to gather relevant feedback.
Haven't seen the ability to host the videos locally, so serious developers are out too. Potentially broadcasting valuable info isn't a big selling point.
https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/elon-musk-vs-short-s...
Just a quick google and not even the paper I was thinking of: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/6050...
If you are right, a lot of highly trained and paid people have made a grave mistake in their throughput estimates and might still be lying about it.
On the other hand there could be bottlenecks they know how to solve but are waiting for the tooling to be done.
Usually goes along with the air gapped system running in a small intranet you strictly control access to.
Its not a bleeding edge technology as the article says (maybe the author made a joke?) but a standard security measure to protect highly sensitive or critical systems.
Privacy is broken, GDPR with informed consent requirements for nonessential data uses, is a first step in the right direction. All the bitching right now is from companies that made money off of selling you out.
The rapid just got rapider today with easy packages, frameworks and containers. The prototypes just became "web scale" and are run way beyond their intended lifespan, just like any first system is.