My desktop “server” with two 4K monitors doesn’t even reach 240W !
2,584 karma · joined April 15, 2023
My desktop “server” with two 4K monitors doesn’t even reach 240W !
If everyone charges $20 for a burger, people will still go to McDonalds. In such a state, no individual place would dare charge $10 again. Why cut revenue to nearly half? It’s not like they have the capacity to sell 20x the usual volume…
I’m not convinced that basic economics works when output capacity isn’t fully scalable.
Same reason no lawn care team tries to deeply undercut competitors - they can only mow so many! (Barring that they hire more helpers)
Managing 100s of devices from a mix of vendors is possible becomes itself a massive ball of crap to stick all the pieces together.
Then add firmware management because now there is a plethora of firmware updates to worry about.
And then dealing with networking discovery & orchestration for such setups is an added horror few even try to visualize.
Then abstract all these differences away so one can provision two different vendor’s servers connected to two different vendor’s managed switches in different racks to a new VLAN. And do it with SR-IOV while you’re at it…
Oh, I forgot shared storage… details, details…
Commodity computing is the modern day Tower of Babel.
Yes, it can be done much simpler if one treats all switches as unmanaged, all storage as local, and all networking as flat. That’s just not acceptable for a lot of use cases though…
At every place I’ve worked, the employees likely had worse thoughts, at least at times, than anything an outsider could publish about the company.
I thought the 1.2 spec was the frozen spec.
Have long thought that creativity is little more than a finely tuned filter driven by noise…
We published 1-2 releases of our component each month. Eventually another (internal) team would pick it up along with others, test, and release the combined set maybe 1-2 times a year.
Customers being extremely risk adverse never wanted to update, due to risk of changes combined with the interruption, even though we were fixing serious bugs left and right from the earlier rushed development.
We’d get escalations on things that were fixed years ago.
Probably should have spent another 3-5 years getting the first release in better shape instead of spending 3-5 years flinging flaming turds to the paying customers.
The executives slowly released they inexplicably lost half the business compared to the previous generation as upstart competitors stole their market share.
You know that famous “how shit happens” tale? I’m pretty sure each layer of management was telling the next how powerful the product was… few could abide by it.
Aside from Apple, running homemade software on a phone was free of cost, even back in the days of Motorola flip phones running Java…
Our own individual ancestors were not perfect people. But we only exist today because they survived.
Wonder if it could degrade to something worse than the status quo where reputations are falsely tarnished by competitors purely as a weapon to get ahead…
I think a rough analog is that it would be difficult to organize the rows of a hash table of everybody in a country by their geographic location.
At this point, people are just thrilled LLMs can even function as they do…
What about asking it to translate “War and Peace” to Klingon and then summarize it?
There are cheap dongles that spoof the EDID for a fixed 4K or HD monitor with fixed settings. Not sure what they do about DCC/CI, might just disconnect it.
I just can’t see the same happening in today’s political climate…
Yeah, prominent thing run by famous guy … but why so much funding so early?
What does $100M enable in the next 5-10 years that $25M doesn’t?
Aside from mere intellectual entertainment, they are worthless in the practical sense. They cannot be used in proofs, nor aid in solutions of other problems. They can’t even suggest if I would take an umbrella.
They are little more than the type of ramblings from people who drink heavily after a day’s work.