186 karma · joined January 19, 2022
Interesting enough, the article/opinion is factually correct, up to today.
Yet people still went with Github. Including those who loudly promote FOSS.
Humans...
For me, I'll leave it. My takeaway: Twitter is indeed the worst global social network - of all time // AND, there are many others that are much better - factually so.
For those who still wish to engage with the service but not feed the beast, remove your tweets and your account: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42159073
(Userscript) https://greasyfork.org/scripts/476062-tweetxer
Til then, still getting the static.
Most weren't 'bad', just noise.
Sure there were some cringy ones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts0XG6qDIco
But some were GREAT!
-- Remember 'CH-ch-ch Chia Pet!' ?? ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzY7qQFij_M
-- How's about local commercials, like in Philadelphia: "Krass Brothers - Store of the Stars!!" ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5R4rNxSWFw
Also, the removal started at least a year ago (2023), as reported in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/recruitinghell/comments/13sdjqi/has...
Anyone else getting this? Any workarounds?
oh IBM, never change...
https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/29/ibm_launches_voluntar...
> Moreover, it felt like a form of equity. Let's face it: HR departments approach the job-search process in a purely transactional manner, sending out automated rejections to desperate job seekers who spent days polishing and perfecting their applications. Now I was doing the same, using adaptive machines to get my human foot in the door. It made the whole shitty process feel a bit more manageable. And if using bots increases your odds of success, it's worth a shot.
Do employers really care, react negatively - if ultimately this leads to their receiving viable candidates?
Good. Let's keep the restrictions in place. Wish we could do an outright ban/poweroff.
This would be a great primer for elementary/primary school students, a nice visual teaser to applied physics and chemistry concepts.
e.g. Y-search used to honor the operators like 'intitle:' and `|` like G-search, but that functionality is long gone. I'm not even convinced '-' works anymore.
Nothing's gonna save their query system except Google's backend engineers. Good luck waiting for that.
---
Until then I highly recommend using userscripts/addons to bring some sanity back to using the platform:
'Block Youtube Users' : "hides videos of users/channels from home, search, related, and comments"
https://greasyfork.org/scripts/11057-block-youtube-users
~~ My favorite! It's like GHHbD[0] but from within Youtube.
[0] http://www.jeffersonscher.com/gm/google-hit-hider/
---
'YouTube: Hide Watched Videos' by EvHaus : 'mask or hide visibility of watched videos and shorts'
https://github.com/EvHaus/youtube-hide-watched
---
'Return WATCHED badge on Youtube (with custom text)' by q1k : "Brings back the WATCHED overlay to the videos you have already watched"
https://greasyfork.org/scripts/419722-return-watched-badge-o...
---
'YouTube Clickbait-Buster' by hjk789 : "Check whether it's worth watching a video before actually clicking on it, by 'peeking' its visual or verbal content, description, comments, viewing the thumbnail in full-size and displaying the full title"
https://github.com/hjk789/Userscripts/tree/master/YouTube-Cl...
---
'Youtube Scrollable Right Side Description' by sh3ll : "Description is moved on the right, expanded and scrollable (and a view-count is put under the player)" {FYI: if you use a white or light theme on YT, go into the script and change the view-count text to something dark}
https://greasyfork.org/scripts/452405-youtube-scrollable-rig...
---
'Make "Videos" the default tab on Youtube channels', a contrib by Scriptchansky
https://greasyfork.org/en/discussions/requests/56798#comment...
Block Youtube Users
> Hide videos of blacklisted users/channels and comments
https://greasyfork.org/scripts/11057
It's like GHHbD but from within Youtube.
Worse--this behavior continues, and has gotten so bad that today searching is all but useless to me.
FYI- Your portal gave me good laugh on how it finds 'exact' Titles: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=+intitle%3Afugi...
It works!
Hide TLDs in search results using:
> Google Hit Hider by Domain [GHHbD] by Jefferson Scher
http://www.jeffersonscher.com/gm/google-hit-hider/
__________
Build your custom filters using...
_____
> The Top 10 Worst TLDs - a rolling live list by SpamHaus
https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/
_____
> "Top Level Domains: Will block most non-traditional domains"
https://github.com/ShadowWhisperer/BlockLists/blob/master/Li...
_____
> hBlock's most_abused_tlds.txt: https://hblock.molinero.dev/
... There are no words...
Which he's presumably considering at the end of 2023:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-15/musk-aims...
> [A company hoping to help California with its high-speed rail built one in North Africa instead, saying the region was ‘less politically dysfunctional’]
> A French state-owned railroad operator wanted to help California with its high-speed rail project.
> The company left after the state refused to listen to its recommendations.
> (US) Law enforcement (agencies) already buys up data from brokers. The Department of Homeland Security...purchased cell phone location data on millions of Americans... The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also been purchasing cell phone location data... These practices circumvent democratic accountability: Agencies buy the information without warrants, and in doing so may bypass prohibitions on companies handing data directly to law enforcement.
> Plus, the data may not even be accurate.
I do sympathize with his line:
> It's "the only realistic way to address advanced AI bot swarms taking over. It is otherwise a hopeless losing battle."