Glassdoor is now adding real names to user profiles without consent
teamblind.com
teamblind.com
nobody@nowhere.com works 99.999% of the time
Sigh.
[edit] it said the name would be used for “verification” (?!?!) but a fake name worked long enough to let me disable the account, anyway.
Yes. But if Blind starts doxxing its users, I think it will tank the industry. Lots of people are going to get fired.
I'm not sure if they got removed in their entirety, or if Glassdoor just disconnected them from my profile.
From there you can at least deactivate your account, not sure what other pages are also accessible without going through the modal.
By clicking the checkbox you are allowing "Glassdoor to permanently delete or anonymize my data."
I'll bet you all the donuts they will not be deleting my data.
If you're in California (or the EU), I bet they will. Otherwise, you're free to file a complaint with the Attorney General. Wouldn't it be nice to have a federal CPRA?
Anyone else getting this? Any workarounds?
Is the point of this change to get real people to delete their reviews in favor of the “fake” reviews made by companies to suppress wages?
This should be illegal.
Interesting is that maybe prominent among those harmed by this underhanded privacy violation are... us techbros.
And it'll hit us where we feel it most, which is in our large salaries -- or lack of same, once we get fired for criticism speech on Glassdoor, and then HR hiring pipeline systems for some other jobs start denylisting our applications, for being a troublemaker who makes public negative comments about other employers on Glassdoor.
If experiencing this harm close to home -- to ourselves and friends/colleagues -- translates into conscientiousness when we're the ones making decisions about other people's privacy, then that's a silver lining.
More generally, you know how sometimes someone is harmed, and that person then goes on to harm others in the same way (as if inspired), but when a different person is harmed, they instead go on to defend others from harm (as if inspired)? It seems the latter person is better for society.
Gambling that human inertia leads to a platform with most of its original users but a much more scalable means to monetize them.