159 karma · joined November 26, 2016
Each time they replaced the top-case which includes the entire battery assembly, touchbar, speakers. Valued at $800 just for the parts each time. That's $9600 for everyone keeping score.
I called Apple's bluff on saying their keyboards are reliable.
Rich people will just pay this fee and keep texting.
Anecdotally, I noticed that all my friends who can't stay off the phone when they are driving are all heavy social media users, so I think the social shaming method will work well: The car takes a picture of them texting and driving and posts it to all their social media accounts.
Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://apresolve.spotify.com/?type=dealer&type=spclient. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed).
This is exactly my point, you reduce noise.
> To understand a dry test, you have to also understand the helper methods, and whatever helpers they all call.
To understand your TEST SUITE, you understand all the helpers exactly once with DRY tests.
Test that are DRY increases the confidence that the test tests the correct things by holding everything else constant.
When the tests break, no one wants to scroll through 500 lines of test code looking at every detail to find out what "variant" the test is and if the problem is in the test because of a fatfinger, or the problem is in the code being tested.
Intel GPUs (including the UHD Graphics 630) can be used with external monitors. HP, Dell, Lenovo, Acer etc all do it.
In fact, in 2013-2015, Macbook Pros were available with ONLY Intel graphics, and supported external monitors.
The reason why you cannot do it with dual-GPU Macbook Pros is that Apple has their own display muxing solution that requires the discrete GPU to be powered up to use external monitors (presumably the ports are attached to the discrete GPU).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Graphics_Technology#Skyl...
The last Macbook Pro with Iris Pro graphics is the Mid-2015 15-inch Macbook Pro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Pro#Technical_specific...
The Mac in the article in particular is a 2019 16-inch model.
Don't forget that EVF can surpass OVF in image quality because they can apply lens correction to the viewed image which brings the image closer to the final product. (although AFAIK it's not done currently)
Huh? EVF and OVF have their own advantages but it is not correct to say optical quality of one is better than the other.
EVF can do things such as boost the exposure which makes things like the 800mm f/11 possible. This would be much too dark otherwise on an OVF.
EVF can also electronically correct the image for certain types of abberations that the lens introduce.
EVFs also don't introduce their own abberations that OVFs do because there isn't as much glass or mirrors to move the image from the lens to the viewer.
OVF certainly have advantage from being a "live" image for tracking purposes but EVFs have mostly caught up enough to make that difference negligible.
Not sure about Parallels.
Modern standby is turning on my XPS so much it can actually get dangerously hot in my backpack.
How does any copy-construction happen here?
> The researchers divided 500,000-plus cases into four categories: male doctors treating men; male doctors treating women; female doctors treating men; and female doctors treating women. “All of those are statistically indistinguishable except for male doctor–female patient,” says Brad Greenwood, an author on the study and a data scientist at the University of Minnesota. If a heart attack patient is a woman and her emergency physician is a man, he says, her risk of death suddenly rises by about 12 percent.
Consent is something you give (regardless of information is factually correct or not).
There should be punishment for consent acquired through fraud, but it is not equivalent to acquiring something without consent.
The fact that the information turned out to be false doesn't invalidate the consent they gave. It's just turns out that consent was acquired via fraud.
Consent cannot be retroactively revoked.
To give an analogy, if I consented to buy a car that advertised 40 mpg but it turns out that it only makes 37 mpg does that mean I was robbed and that I did not consent to buy the car?
No, it means I consented to buy a car that fraudulently misstated its fuel efficiency claims. There should be punishment for such fraudulent claims, but it should not be equated to robbery.
3600J = 1 Wh.
Fraud is a completely different matter.
For example, Lightning is built ontop of BTC:
https://github.com/LeelaChessZero/lc0 https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish