735 karma · joined September 12, 2021
In the case of the FTC's proposal to split Amazon, the FTC has been collecting evidence to support its claims for the past three years, even before Lina Khan took office as the chair. In addition, Amazon has actually pressured third-party retailers by using its dominant position in online shopping. Therefore, I think the claim is more likely to be upheld than in the Activision case.
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87980831&caseType=SERIAL_...
The article mentions that the FTC was previously seen as being too close to big business. However, the only other regulatory body that has opposed the acquisition of AB by Microsoft is the UK's CMA, which is led by a person with ties to Sony. In addition, the FTC's arguments in court seemed to be more focused on protecting Sony than on protecting consumers.
The EU is generally very critical of market dominance by large companies, but it has approved the acquisition of AB. This suggests that not all regulatory bodies are puppets of big business.
The FTC has been criticized for being too focused on preventing large acquisitions and not doing enough to protect consumers. As a result, the FTC has been seen as being on the side of Sony, which is the dominant player in the high-end gaming market.
Hmmm...