368 karma · joined November 22, 2019
It stands to reason that Sima Qian, if he cared about posterity, would have submitted his works to people who make it a point on preserving records.
Similarly a person is writing a digital work, they will need to go through a digital analogue of the same process, if they want to preserve their work.
The process of bit entropy acts like digital moths.
If anything, give the C-suites the shitbox laptops.
Power lifters, however, tend to focus on the compound movements and therefore probably need less equipment.
https://www.daskeyboard.com/blog/how-george-r-r-martin-write...
This is an incredible insight in and of itself, thank you.
This is essentially a tragedy of the commons, which could easily be overcome if the right people got into power. The right people will never get into power, because it is against the interest of billionaires.
Won't be enough, because the biggest consumers of carbon are billionaires and their corporations.
The best thing I ever did was get a really good ergonomic chair after this for A$700.
Because a potential solution exists in which people can have the optimal solution with no drawbacks— why not have it.
It isn’t “convenience” and other “first world problems” to realise that you need to use certain software to function in society with few trade offs.
The privacy-invading nature of many pieces of software isn’t innate. It’s a choice, and it could easily be regulated.
People shouldn’t have to pay with their data.
Yo bartender, I’ll have what he’s having.
Which is handy if I ever feel like wiping my Mac fresh and running a single command to install everything.