91 karma · joined July 17, 2007
Makes a big case for OAuth in my mind.
A: Not yet. I haven't spent much time reading the next batch of applications yet.
The only time I continue to use the left hand Ctrl key is in conjunction with the mouse cursor - I use a ThinkPad, so it's difficult to control the trackpoint with the same hand (my right) as I use to hold Ctrl.
I noticed that this is a repost of a submission originally titled 'Show HN: My side project helps you add beautiful text on pinterest images '. That post garnered just five upvotes and no comments.
Clearly, you've garnered more attention with this post. What prompted you to try this particular verbiage instead? Do you think timing played a factor?
At any rate, given how many readers are probably new to the The Last Question, it's probably worth citing another Asimov piece that is oft-mistaken for The Last Question - The Last Answer. It's a more recent work, and a bit more obscure, but worth the read if you're into Asimov.
Received a reply that this was not yet on their radar, but that mugshots are considered public domain. Not sure what to make of this, but it seems a bit extortionary and surely unfair to those people who were ultimately found innocent, yet still have their mugshots appearing on these sites.
But really, thank you.
http://www.appscout.com/2007/10/excel_bug_exterminated.php
Imagine being the accountant who learned about this too late...
Do you have any unsubstantiated claims that DON'T come from "The Secret"?
I had first read TLQ many years ago, and had recently tried to find the story online, only to come across TLA. As hard as I tried, I couldn't come across the original story about the Multi-Vac (which, of course, is TLQ). I became briefly convinced that I had never actually read TLQ, but had made the story up in my head... until I read this post. Turns out I'm not actually genius. Kudos!
http://destructionoverdrive.blogspot.com/2005/06/last-answer...
That said, I agree that this kid needs a dose of humility, and I'm sure he's going to get it in spades over the next few years.
Rather, what I'd take away (from a cursory level, anyways) is not his glibness and glaringly ostentatious demeanor-- it's his glibness and glaringly ostenation demeanor <em>at such a young age</em>.
Rarely would we encounter such a young individual with such brazen behavior that he feels not that he's merely <em>able</em> to operate with an adult's social capabilities, but that he's in fact <em>entitled</em> to operate in such capacities.
While I realize that this boldness and brashness can be jealously misconstrued as simple pomp... this kid has true (thought perhaps not intellectual) genius and is certainly nothing akin to anything as depraved as, say, a Paris Hilton.