1 karma · joined December 26, 2025
I guess it cuts both ways - she certainly garnered more attention than your average unicorn startup CEO. Now those same forces are working against her.
Farming, auto, journalism, and marketing fits your model. But medicine, finance, and tech would suggest otherwise. I've been getting advice about how there is no money in software and I should study hardware since 90s.
Yes, maybe this is a freefall and we haven't made impact yet. But drawing parallel without further evidence seems to be too simple of a analysis.
What cause the jobs in Detroit to be outsourced? What skills was replaced? How easy was it to train those skills? What was the potential pool of workers? What was the demand of workers?
All I'm saying is that this question is a lot more nuanced. I'm a software engineer, so I'm biased. But I'm guessing that you might be biased in some ways too. The real answer, perhaps boring, is that we really don't know. Even if you're right - you could easily be off by 200 years.
I've been using that instead of print debug, it's been great.
Also, tangentially, what statistics should I calculate if I want to measure how "concentrated" the distribution is? The first thing that comes to mind is Gini coef, does that apply here or is there something else? The question I'm trying to answer is if the jobs are more dispersed among different cities or concentrated - assuming the cities themselves don't matter.
No need to get all riled up about fairness.
Does percentage make more sense here or absolute number? It depends on your context. I would say in this argument, it seems more certain that Von Neumann's success, which is always a function of both nature and nurture, can probably be attributed more to nature. Or, perhaps most likely, it's a rare event of talent meets incredible luck.
Moments like this where I'm reminded that BI is really more about telling a good story. Kudos!
https://supchina.com/ is a good website on this topic. I discovered them through a podcast call Sinica https://supchina.com/series/sinica/ (the podcast is extremely good)
Dan Wang https://danwang.co/ - some of his writing is scattered across different publications - it's best to follow him on Twitter - He is perhaps one of the deepest thinkers on the topic. More sympathetic towards China. If you really want to dive down the rabbit hole - look up his employer. It is a think-tank on China, and has some excellent publications.
Economist's coverage of China is also good.
Also I would like to recommend a book - Trade Wars are Class Wars - it's a popular book lately, and bring up some excellent concepts. From what I've heard this book is playing a role in framing how Washington is thinking about China now.
You might find this book helpful - it is a textbook, but approachable, albeit a bit expensive.
I pick up this book off recommendation from Hackernews, and it has really help me work through my thoughts in a rather clear framework. Suddenly, it seems, thoughts and emotions became traceable.
I was also lucky that some of my good friends are PhD clinical psy folks (i think focusing on early childhood, mostly). According to them, this is the latest and greatest from that academic field that is riddle with charlatans and crazy methods, so please take everything with a grain of salt. The author of this book, I was told, is the father of the ABC model (Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence), which came from Skinner, the rats guy - I think...
For me - Controlling my thoughts, even when I understand them to some degree, is still very hard, everyday I'm tempted to just go the other route - medication.
Mine was about 2/3 gone. Definitely beyond of the point of "hm..this wine taste funny"
Over the years I've had so many little moments like this with Costco, whether it is a friendly exchange with a gas station attendee, a door person stopping me and pointing out that I was over-charged, a service rep who couldn't find an off-brand pedialyte I purchased so they gave me a pedialyte and told me "eh yeah just don't tell anyone", it really started to make sense to me why when you mention Costco - some people would light up and say "man I LOVE Costco", when it's just a store.
Big franchise like this rarely ends well, especially if you're juggling so many different characters.
It is shocking how well they delivered.
He was kinda rude and I was like wtf. And then he proceeds to return all of the wine, I asked him "dude wheres the open bottle?" And he said "I thought you were returning that one too?"
Turns out in some states - they allow you to return opened bottle of wine. We laughed it off
I've also worked with some of their buyers / purchasers - best in the business for sure. Very QA focus company
Next was QQ the software, I think inspired by the name ICQ, developed by WeChat's developer, Tencent. Prior to smart phones and wechat - QQ was the dominating platform
There are also non-scalable parts - access to expert, prestige, and all the bits you've mentioned. I think that's probably where the future of ed-tech is going.
In my own experience, where I went to kindergarten was an outcome of who my grandma knew. Similarly, when I was sick and needed to see a doctor, I had to know someone who knew someone...
Yes - it's similar in the west. But to say they're the same would be like saying 100M dash and marathon is the same sport.
Another book that I really enjoy that seem to be of the same ilk: confession of an economic hitman
Not to say anything about libertarian - I'm just curious.
Where is my flying car I believe is the title. Earlier this year I saw a book review from the star slater codex substack. Didn't read it tho
The best way to progress has been GDP growth - modern medicine is not driven by good-will, kindness, or faith. It's driven by profit