A blogger criticizing the competitor of the company that puts food on his table.
Just a thought, imagine how this article would be if the companies were reversed. Would it be the same?
And that's how you recognize objectivity...
210 karma · joined March 19, 2017
Just a thought, imagine how this article would be if the companies were reversed. Would it be the same?
And that's how you recognize objectivity...
https://blog.cloudflare.com/validating-leaked-passwords-with...
P.S.: As a non-native speaker had to look those words up to check them, as I trusted the spelling from an official blog post.
This reminded me of the montage on season 1 where everybody talks about changing the world when presenting their apps/services...
Then you wouldn't see more designs like this one.
Quick, someone should register it and publish a book and make a career giving talks about it...
One thing I somewhat miss from what you are explaining is all the aditional things that LXD gets you (snapshots using ZFS, image publishing/sharing, migrating containers between LXD hosts...)
But maybe some of those things are still doable (e.g. mounting a ZFS dataset as storage for /var/lib/machines/containerX)...
Thanks for your answer!
(Substitute decision with belief)
I have used LXD (with ZFS storage) in production but have not played with systemd-nspawn...
Thanks!
I really like when someone that doesn't have a horse in the race reviews some language (better if it has been used in anger). You gotta value the perspective of a pragmatic engineer that has misapplied a tool.
There's a lot to learn about where a language is best used, but when someone pay is somewhat tied to a language I don't trust the analysis as much.
Have checked out some apps from Google Play and it seems slick.
As an Android user myself I think choice is good but also think Apple should strive to offer as few choice as possible.
It's one of their main strengths.
For all the problems that it brings anonimity has that good facet.
When reading threads like this from 4chan I feel the spirit of the internet of yore, when everything was more free and we were a little more sincere.
Seriously, professionality is being able to use the right tool for the job at hand.
It's the parents job to be firm and establish some limits, making sure they are respected.
Not everything is black or white (no architecture vs clean architecture). You have to think about what you are doing (having fucked up on previous projects help) and don't follow anything you've read blindly.
Silver bullets, yadda yadda
I have seen awesome talks and it didn't matter if the slides were not pretty.
It worked quite well, I don't know why Google Home doesn't have anything like this.
(Jump to 25:50 for an anecdote about maintaining a "well engineered" system)
When using Python I feel the least resistance from the language, you can do a lot with a little code. Problem is, when the system grows you begin to miss the checking that static typing provides (esp. when doing refactors).
When coding in Go I feel that there is a little productivity lost upfront, but when your script begins growing and starts to look like a "serious" project you feel more confident changing your old code. This is because some kind of errors are caught by the type system before doing manual/automated testing.
And I'm talking about personal projects where I'm alone, this could be more important in projects with several coders.
When people say they like Go's static type system sometimes they are comparing it to something more verbose like Java.
Think about someone that knows Python and have to use Java, then they think that all static type languages are as a pain in the ass. So they begin disliking static type systems when they really just hate the Java's one.
And so the moment they are using Python and start playing with Go they find a static type system they kinda like because it's less verbose and without so much ceremony.
I know quite a few devs that would be like that if they had to work on something like a legacy J2EE webapp.
It was some kind of penalization for some general terms like "video chat app". Before the app was in the first 10 or so and after it disappeared completely from results. But searching for the app by full name works. Also it disappeared completely from the "social" category listing.
They tols us that "search algorithm is secret and complex" but we had a previous experience like this one with an app that had unallowed content in Google Play (unreviewed images from users showing erotic content) This one was penalized with some months of disappearing from general terms search results and listing.
But now no explanation. At least they should give you an answer if there is some kind of infraction of content policy.
It worked well until Google removed our main app from search results and it all went downhill from there.