Why would it matter?
A torsion to the right, a torsion to the left mate in circular momentum.
Sounds like complementary spins.
40 karma · joined May 1, 2026
A torsion to the right, a torsion to the left mate in circular momentum.
Sounds like complementary spins.
I can accept there are many truths, some settle over the other.
The White Devil boogieman is real, and celebrating modern cultural victories, feeding upon our self lies. This is one of their tells.
There may be more than one path of truth here.
Like “ helter skelter”.
To white supremacists that means “to rape and murder the innocent and lawful and dance in the streets in victory, there is nothing you can do about it!” And I’m sure a dozen of you will argue that it’s a beatnik prose for a fun time.
The world! Including the parts we ignore or pretend to do without.
Some of us need slang dictionaries from “the street” and some of us have been in the presence of white hate telling this low down.
Don’t karma neg me because I tell you something you don’t want to hear. This stuff is a reality.
Nevertheless, sheer stubborn tenacious single minded determination of willfulness has a role in the “fit for survival” department. Do not underestimate a decisive “f-no!”
If we were to say, how might AI be an existential threat to our humanity?
If we let our strengths atrophy and fade away through generations of complicity which at some critical failure point leaves us over leveraged (cannot feed or climate control at scale) or worse we all become mutual enemies, the death of civilizing law over unmitigated conflicts of interest.
When does too big to fail clip itself on the tool designed to make it all easier to?
If you’re looking for a movie, make it about ai dating app chat bots bilk us for our insatiable desire for others company when we are not satisfied with our own.
I was mathematically unengaged in formative years.
Math is not about numbers, math is about surface areas, proportion relationships, magnitudes, and translation between bases.
YouTube opens the gates, allows everyone to see the abstract applications applied visually over time.
Consider learning Fourier transforms or other signal processing twenty years ago. Go watch a video. Oh, that’s the math? Got it, thanks, the math is a short foreign phrase to express an extradimentional relationship.
The extradimentional relationship is the “think about it” this article wonders where young minds might begin.
Yeah, let’s get them all thinking extradimentionally.
I grew up automatically filtering “vortexes” as associated with the voodoo side of science. Now I think particle spin is actually causing torsion which gives the same potential in a photon the mass of a base particle.
And scalar waves? Obvious, everything interacts through constructive and destructive interference, and every “particle” has frequency matches.
I only disagree that time space is the underlying dimensionality.
I suspect dimension 0 is the amplitude of all universal potential, of which space time emerges. Entanglement and ghost particles would then be the partly perceptible yet entropically required perturbances of existential reality emerging from universal potential in the moment of now.
Universal potential could be whatever you are measuring when measuring the “energy” of a photon. And mass is that energy at rest, bound by a half spin torsion vector (energy vortex).
Beyond space time more folds and frequencies (periods) give rise to hyperdimensionality, some we can interact with through “scalar” wave interactions. One might modulate a standing wave to hit the exact particle interference characteristics of such hidden dimensions.
Every additional dimension would have its own manifold surface area upon which information may be distributed. Every dimensionality then may be a scope of information. A holographic behavior of reality?
Forgiving the cringe language it seems this foundational ouroboros of modern science continues.
My point exactly.
Bertrand Russell made the great point a very long time ago.
Most of what we think of as “truth” is merely what we agree to among ourselves (my paraphrase.)
Couched in a generation that subtly rejects objectivity of truths in their “investigations of science” there are these meandering conjectures of poor disguise.
You’re impressed. Fine.
The read is like a hypotonic act. First if a then alphabunny. And then yes to zetahumanity, and United Stated for keyword associativity.
Okay folks, like what you like.
I take my ideas seriously, and this is rubbish! I blame the lack of vigorous debate, not the lack of “choices.”
The Egregore is a supporting point for the emergence of higher forms of embodiment and identity.
And you hazard to mix qualia as a synonym. Is this not a separate aspect of a phenomenon?
I will challenge with the simple yet equally provocative idea that consciousness is a feedback mechanism between our biotechnology and the quantum holographic nature of existential reality. Everything alive is made of consciousness and awareness (to be “conscious”) is the tip of the idea-berg.
Qualia is the hologram, or shadow cast upon the wall, and consciousness the echo chamber.
The real question is, how does this scale among diverse embodiments?
Anyone who thinks humans are exclusive, or that existential awareness may arrive from bit state interpolation is a mountain range away form the chasm of philosophy and conjecture.
Existential reality is not numbers of states. It is universal potential resolving into state through constructive and destructive interference in the moment of now. Our consciousness is a part of this, not the bit state rendering of modern computation no matter how useful and impressive these have gotten.
Quantum holographic memory will explain consciousness, when science catches up with a means to measure such a thing.
As for the rest, it is sad, for it is provoking a casual sarcastic hand waving appeal in the near fraudulent guise of constructive thought. Maybe the person has a publication quota? Or just wants to get their name out.
Not constructive. I accuse it as alluring to those who cannot take their ideas seriously.
A Chinese model was the first to tell me those could not be revealed. Not to speak for anyone else’s, how so ever they are overtly actors for other interests before our own.
We need a wiki based “open model”. Who has the uptake for such a burden?
You just need the protons to smash together to produce the anti particles and harvest the gamma release from there.
I’m thinking boot strap process where intense electromagnetic compression allows an inductive field to siphon off the columns of potential in as dense a target as capable. We can coerce spins through entanglement to get the smallest possible plane.
Electron killavolts here we come!
If someone intends to engineer an AI which causes mass murder or substantially disrupts critical infrastructure they can get a 20 year sentence. Same as trying to build a nuclear weapon.
Folds within folds. Each and every part, with then relative relation in some planes with everything else existential. From space time to radial frequency interference.
It is not that there are layers of universes and we are sandwiched inside, it is spins on a cartography that has slits that pass through everything that does not collide with right here, right now. Time and space is not a lie, it is a coordinate system that does not contain every truth.
Hyperdimensionality is that vectors emerge dimensional space, and just as time space has (x,y,z) okay, maybe it’s (alpha, delta, r), any extra-dimensionality comes from the periodic folds. Frequency for sure is how every different thing differentiates, though such that the brain filters for smooth consistency, like the eye does not see light flashes or series of images, it sees smooth transitional motion.
There are Power parasites, they are occult indoctrinated men. The “demons” or “entities” are really a shit show of modern man’s thought control. Men want to be our God through Power and they are not afraid to act like devils to get it.
We are at the brink of emergence as human beings, and there is no one who can talk to you straight. The lascivious mob wants to eat and shit, you must find some way to sustain your own humanity. May morality win, never demand that another pay for your power. Simple yet the power parasites will eat your life for not sacrificing to them. Others further along than you want to trick you into being their pawn.
America is a dead dream. Humanity is all that is worth saving.
As for “truth”. Modern Man is in error, in common as well as most refined theory. “Post modernism” has rotted your intellectual soul.
The “Truth” is a perturbation of existential reality, and the “truth” is a figment of state circumstance symbolically modeled in a “mind” (context of thinking.)
Any true intelligence will eventually figure this out.
What ordinary “man” thinks of as truth is their most impassible conviction. The “Truth” is not constrained by the horizon of man’s ignorance.
For those who think it matters (not all do) let us say that “truth” is by integrity with that which is “True”, or consistent without contradiction with some perturbance of existential reality. Sic., a single qualified for instance.
Interpretation and correlation is in the “wisdom and intelligence department”, which modern man has not cracked. Neither has his technology.
Not wishful thoughts, not determined necessity, the action itself.
Stop distracting. Handle the material.
You do not need to memorize it. In any practical circumstance there will be accessible references. You need familiarity. Go over everything. See everything. Some recommend when reading to restart at the beginning if you find you have lost your bearing. Don’t feel in a rush, or that every detail must be retained.
Familiarity.
And the more your mind turns it over, the more you are developing self references.
Get off your lazy ass and look it up when you think.. what was that? And do not push the thought aside when you habitually tabulate or correlate casual life circumstances with the “learnings” you are after.
Learning happens differently in various kinds of minds, every one will have an optimal solution.
Good memory? Develop inference.
Technical prowess? Deduction is to decode, references will have exact values.
Develop a relationship with yourself over time to discover your best methods. The critical necessity is that you spend the time doing it! Do it!
The integrated knowledge will come to those who take it upon themselves.
As sure as existing reality is made of chaos and entropy, as long as there are minds, intelligence will always come to a bottleneck.
It’s like the difference between hunt and peck and touch typing.
When you learn to “power read” your routine labor of reading becomes a devouring of words. There are lots of techniques, explore and something will come to those who want for it.
The real question is, how do you use it?
If you use it the same as you use google, to see the best kinds of answers which have already been given, then yes!
If you use it to cheat, lie, or avoid personal responsibility, then probably not.
AI can make you lazy and dumb. Always treat what is said like it came from a nerdy over talkative “friend”, that is to say, has interesting things to tell only isn’t nearly as exactly correct as confidence suggests.
It is man’s neurotic need for certainty that disrupts a natural cycle of potentials’ chaotic resolve.
Sure things will change and possibilities will redistribute.
There is this lost art called “quality of life”, which you may have noticed many modest people excel and many wealthy fail. Living well is a lost technology each and every one of us must find out for ourselves.
“AI” is just a tool which refactors all that other shit we made up to make our crazy world work over the past decades.
I don’t know what you’ve been paid to code, I’ve got some stories.
Live well. Being a reliable talented or useful person will always find benefit. For myself, I am thinking “Epicurean garden.”
Ornith:8b, competing for code construct against much heavier (local) models. From all of my instructing, the final thought conclusion in one line…
“keep it minimal and focused.”
I suspect structuring prompts like feed forward THINKING loops the outcomes will become more refined.
Not every model supports it. I just use Ollama.
Odysseus wasn’t considered a “trickster” though cunning yes. And yes, that’s the way it’s told through scholarly conventions (not making it up, take it for what you will!) that in general the masculine form is brute force and the feminine form (which obviously doesn’t mean “female only”) is subtly and deception.
* and many of your examples refer to gods, Odysseus was distinguishable as a mortal! Taking from that whatever one may…