yehoshuapw

"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!"

would you install such a app (without compiling from source)? I would not trust it to not come with "friends"

(but would love to verify and use)

that is true, but if the metric is what we want optimized, then that's fine.

However it is more likely to be something which can be detached..

Shoplifty

extra reviews never hurt. But trusting only the AI to both code and review security-wise? not even close to usable

mostly, because setting up a separate network is harder.

a virtual network built upon the regular internet is much easier.

And yes, mostly done wrong

I don't know. I fully agree, and never did really try out this in depth yet.

I suspect rules with negations are not the same as don't rules, but unknown if really true, if so:

"when writing code do not add comments, code should not need it" may work

I've come recently across arxiv 2604.20911

which claims "do" rules persist much better then "don't" rules.

I find it fascinating how (in the new version) the further away clumps stay separate, until something small from the larger swarm reaches them, then they all merge back to it

while I do agree with this point, I want to point out that this isn't quite a fair comparison.

every single entity has (normally) a single (real) burial site. Us grouping many unknowns in one group, and comparing to a single specific one is not quite fair...

there is only one burial site of many other fictional characters including some other well known and beloved ones.

discworld mud (any many others) ase still totally worth playing

iirc "nav" works to, and all commands have a shorter prefix which works

While that is true, if there is something worthwhile enough in a far and safe location - it won't stay that way

And https://xkcd.com/1047/

I think this isn't quite the right example - a pocket calculator does not need you to verify its output. It is better to be able to calculate, but if you can't seems much less a issue then using a AI without being able to do whatever you asked of it

(So I fully agree with your point, but I think your example is not strong enough)

and perhaps somewhat safer

can you please expand on your thoughs on the thumb cluster?

(I have a dactly I kind of finished wiring, but didn't get around to programming it yet)

I've slowly built up a set of scripts to do this: too many different methods, but eventually I get csv files for each account, then hledger import - and finally I manually fix up details

See also https://hledger.org/

and plain text accounting in general

"It takes zero knowledge to" is sadly a statement that works only given common sense,

which too many people are sorely lacking

Regardless of the community,

Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality is worth a read.

https://hpmor.com/chapter/1

Or a listen: https://hpmorpodcast.com/?page_id=56

my favorite game in love: mario, with portals

https://stabyourself.net/mari0/

Matt Parker video about dithering, worth a watch:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kT4p1GXq4HY

Have a look also at https://www.printables.com/model/268580-hadley-telescope-off...

the smaller something of that type is, the harder to make it durable (I think)

as a kernel developer, I use LLMs for some tasks, but can say it is not there yet to write real kernel space code

you may be able to create dirs as input, and watch some others as output

not really. cadquery started as a freecad workbench, but moved out a long while ago. So current cadquery isn't usable inside freecad (which is a shame).

also worth a look: build123d

have a look at https://projecteuler.net/

for "Thinker" brain food. (it still has the issue of not being a pragmatic use of time, but there are plenty interesting enough questions which it at least helps)