A fraudulent contract is not a contract.
57 karma · joined January 29, 2021
A fraudulent contract is not a contract.
Then I thought - would anyone be offended if we use the term "holocaust" for wiping a hard drive.
The language we use does impact how we think and frame things, that's part of being human.
The word master doesn't occupy this space in my head and never has. I've associated this term primarily with teachers from a very early age. There's obviously the master-slave terminology in tech, but that really doesn't map to slavery in my head. This is probably because I'm from the British Isles which has a very different history in terms of slavery.
For me, I felt this change was really about the impact this term has for people who have been impacted by slavery having to continue to use these terms, which I thought many must felt comes across as, at best, insensitive.
Hence, I felt the cost of doing this seems reasonable. I mean, if we used the term holocaust for wiping a hard drive at some point people would probably have said - "err, yeah, no that's just a bad idea", because it would be offensive.
"Ooo, guns, guns, guns!"
Hate speech can be defined as anything that those in power choose they want to suppress, which means in practice its really just censorship.
Besides which, it's counter productive.
The first batch might...
If there are 5 apples in the world, but I can go to the market and sell 10 of them, that market does not reflect the real price of apples.
Even more so if after that I can pretend to sell apples at even lower prices back and forth between me and my mate, who's also been selling apples.
And NOT people engaging in the normal market mechanisms that the market uses up establish value - i.e. buying.
Have you actually thought this through?
Use your browser.