Part 1: http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-marc-andreessen...
Part 2: http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-andreessen-on-i...
If you haven't heard this story before, it's worth a watch.
2,655 karma · joined February 27, 2007
Our blog: https://wyday.com/blog/
Part 1: http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-marc-andreessen...
Part 2: http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-andreessen-on-i...
If you haven't heard this story before, it's worth a watch.
No, it's presumptuous. You made no mention of ongoing negotiation, and I assumed a post entitled "Blu-Ray Still Blows" would muddy up negotiations if they existed.
Since you're here, correct me. Are you working with the owners of the technology to get this solved for independent producers?
Get support from other independent producers, get a following, get some press, and eventually get your way.
Instead he chooses to just complain. That's just lazy.
These types of whiny posts don't contribute much of anything. There's no real solution proposed. Other than "I want to use proprietary technology but I don't want to pay the fees".
At any rate, I'm using Windows 7 right now. I assure you I'm not lying.
Or is that the point? The fact that Google made an exception to its algorithm for a conference is newsworthy?
But seriously, what the hell is this doing on HN? Can't we leave this crap to reddit?
That's just silly.
Getting bugged by people who could never add value to you (emotionally, monetarily, or otherwise) is not a nice problem to have. It's just a problem.
That screenshot is not accurate. You have to work to get it that ugly. (That is, he change the "View by" to large icons). The control panel is incredibly usable with its default layout.
I didn't read the rest of it, no point. I'm using Windows 7 right now and it's great. It puts XP and Vista to shame.
Plus the cost of training IT people to install Firefox across thousands of computers (you didn't think they'd install it one-by-one did you?).
Etc, etc.
These are mockups, not screenshots.
I can see tripe like this being on Digg, but why is this on hacker news?
It's only so simple when you have a single binary file with no dependencies running only on the developer's machine.
Beyond that, it's quite a complex problem. I could give you a list of about a thousand major problems that need to be solved to make a "one size fits all" updater. Plus, it's not in the self interest of either Microsoft or Apple to allow update installation from unverified sources.
... similar store for Windows in their own update service ...
The store has been tried before (once by MS, many many times by 3rd parties). Each time it was a failure. Largely due to the uncoupled nature of the "Windows ecosystem".
You make a few good points in your post. We get a lot of customers trying to solve the very problems you describe. Auto updating in particular is an exceedingly hard problem to solve.
Besides all of the immediately obvious technical considerations (Self updating, inter-process communication, update rollback on failure) there are many problems that developers don't think about until it's too late (admin rights, Vista/7 UAC).
You might be interested in the series of posts I've been writing on creating an updater from scratch: http://wyday.com/blog/
He owns the company. Does he also hold the whip?
Choose your poison.
The best complaint he has is "parking their car crooked in the parking lot", but how does that make a person "anal"? If anything, it's careless anti-social people who park crooked.
Why is this garbage being voted up?
It's bad for business when you have to defend your product as not a virus (on top of trying to sell it!)
I wrote about it 2 years ago: http://wyday.com/blog/2007/useful-instantupdate-feedback/
Still pretty tiny.
Plus, have you used Symantec Endpoint Protection? It uses 8 megabytes of memory. Tiny.