PayPal Doubles Fees, Forgets to Tell Customers
sitepoint.com
sitepoint.com
So, the problem here appears to be that everyone running their personal account for business purposes is bitching about how they can't sneak around the fees anymore.
Good advice. I used PayPal for the first time in years trying out listia.com the other day, and was amazed that they still haven't added autocomplete="off" to their credit card number fields - every piece of information one needs to make online purchases is cached (unencrypted, usually) to your hard disk. Idiocy.
There is no details page for a transaction and you can only see the item that was sold in a CSS popup that disappears when you mouse away, making it impossible to copy-paste.
And then there's the fact that their calculations can be off sometimes. We have some sales that are € 12.75. The transaction costs for that is € 0.44 or € 0.45, I don't know which: the amount field says it's € 0.44, but our balance is actually decreased by € 0.45. That's a rather bad mistake to make as a payment provider...
All in all I'm not too happy with Moneybookers. It gets us money and it's cheap, but it's perfectly clear why they are cheap...
Edit: Also, Moneybookers sales were less than 5% of the Paypal sales...
Also MB has some security advantages. You can already notice on the front end (captcha etc.)
Paypal really is much more polished. Their reporting is top-notch. They have an API. And they have an interface which doesn't confuse me. It's not perfect, but it's a lot better than MB...
http://slash7.com/articles/2009/3/26/google-is-evil-worse-th...
Here's one nuisance, among many: Google Checkout makes it impossible for you to search by important pieces of data like, oh, customer name.
If I get an email from Jane Smith at an unrecognized email address (because customers often have several of them), I can't find her transaction through Google Checkout. I have to open up my dashboard, which was coded by some chump who writes bingo card software in his spare time but nonetheless is better at search than Google, look up the transaction, then copy/paste the order number so I can search by it at Google.
I log in to Google Checkout, there's a search box right above the list of recent orders. (Title: "Search Orders.") I type in "Smith" and get a list of 10 orders. 6 of them are buyers with the last name "Smith." The other four have "Smith" in the address somewhere.
I agree that search and reporting (among other things) leaves much to be desired--I ended up hiring someone to do data entry when I wanted a list of customer zip codes recently--but when I find myself in a similar situation to what you describe, I have no problems at all.
Of note: previously, Personal accounts did not charge money for receiving payments. Almost no one uses Personal accounts to receive payments, because they cannot take payments by credit cards, cannot be used on eBay, and cannot be used with APIs (last time I checked). Premier accounts have always charged money for receiving payments.
What changed: when you send a payment, you have to specify what the payment is for. There are a few options:
Payment for: Services, Goods, eBay Items Personal payment: Gift, Payment Owed, Cash Advance, Living Expense, Other
Here's the change: if the sender codes a payment as one of the three "payment for" options, the recipient gets charged. This is unremarkable for 99.99% of people receiving payments on Paypal, because they've had premier accounts for years (to receive CC payments), but it inconveniences people who were using Paypal to receive payments funded from Paypal balances.
Note: You can still receive payments, for free, if they're both funded from a Paypal balance and coded as Gift, Payment Owed, etc.
It still says "Free when the money comes from PayPal balance or bank account", which is what I thought people were complaining is no longer the case.
Paypal always charged to receive money. That's how it works.
What am I missing?
See https://www.thepaypalblog.com/2009/08/a-clarification-on-pay...
The parent article is just wrong.