But some think that if you stop providing features or fixes at the fastest pace possible or if you stop to refactor you're just wasting time or slacking off.
241 karma · joined July 3, 2013
But some think that if you stop providing features or fixes at the fastest pace possible or if you stop to refactor you're just wasting time or slacking off.
"fake news" for who? For the Chinese government?
For the company that denies that their new phone explodes?
This is getting very ugly
Good experience so far for me.
The only real caveat I have with spotify is the awfully buggy applications.
As it was with Boromir (who wanted it for good) or Gandalf when he denies taking the ring. They could've ended doing evil with initial noble intentions, that's how the ring would've exploited them.
You can even argue that all of the things there end up being the users fault as they choose so for convenience.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:4rknDaG...
Not much a comparison to proprietary software.
And makes you think if it would or should go the same way of other non profitable but socially valuable activities, by the hands of non profit foundations and/or government support.
And if that would be a better or worse model than the current one.
I could go and lick the grass on my porch. I won't get paid for that. No matter how much I would like it.
Many things are just not profitable.
Unless you find other models, like patronizing