277 karma · joined January 5, 2017
I guess there are probably no surveys of this though...
This is one more thing pushing me in that direction.
To be honest, I don't think it so much of an issue any more. I have a library of parts I use regularly and just design footprints for new parts.
I'm my case, I doubt that Altium would have footprints for many of the parts I want to use anyway (quite often cheap connectors, switches etc). I feel like being comfortable with footprint design is an important part of the design process.
That said, there are many features of Altium that look very attractive. For example the push and shove routing.
I also recommend the excellent "getting to blinky" videos:
https://contextualelectronics.com/learning/getting-to-blinky...
Which teach the basics of Kicad too.
I think I've seen this before in an HPC context. But they've build a firmware distribution called Heads. It boots using coreboot then fires up a Linux kernel from flash.
The kernel is then used as a second stage bootloader. It takes about 2 seconds to get Linux booted from flash.
They can then boot the system OS, optionally using kexec to smoothly transition to the system kernel.
Very neat! Along the way they've also done other important work, like put together a minimal firmware for the Management engine (a second CPU in Intel system with its own OS, and many many issues).
The biggest problem here is same issue that coreboot has. Coreboot support is really limited. I think it down supports Lenovo X220s, but late time I looked not much modern hardware.
I tried search for me info, but could find anything. Was this the default? Procedure given in a popular tutorial? It seems pretty insane.
When my daughter pours water in the keyboard I just get a new one and don't have to care too much.
I guess he got lucky, but as a parent I worry about this. He points out that most educational establishments don't encourage individual exploration, and that was my experience too.
Makes me consider home schooling, but that seems like a less than ideal solution too. Do we just have to rely on luck?
They cost on the order of 100USD for the cheapest models. The cheapest Wifi "IoT" microcontrollers are on the order of 1USD.
Seems like it might be a reasonable business move, even if it's just a box ticking exercise.
I'll be surprised if they do put them in their lowest end products though. Perhaps those product lines are stable and won't be updated in 2017?
For that reason, I find it difficult to have a completely unbiased opinion on our current state of progress.
But... while we seem to be making great progress, it seems like we're a long way off understanding how the human mind works.
AlphaGo was an amazing achievement, but I think it's unlikely that the human mind tackles Go in the same way.
It's obviously possible that there are multiple routes to a general human level intelligence. But I think it's still unclear if the way AI is currently being developed is one of them.
I wonder how hard that would be.
There's also Netsurf, I've not used it but it. Looks awesome: http://www.netsurf-browser.org
Seems to be doing a pretty good job.
If the new hires told you their salaries the difficulty is discussing it without revealing this fact. Management sometimes frowns on that.
If the pay range was publicly disclosed in an advert that would be the best way to go.
In general however it seems like an entirely reasonable thing to do. Just don't get too aggressive.
I always value Stallman's commitment, but it's often impractical to maintain while being a productive member of society.
Keeps me considering the possibility of freer alternatives though, and I find it valuable for that reason alone.
I don't think it's likely to happen any time soon unfortunately.
Regarding Facebook, it still feels weird, I'm not sure I can put my finger on exactly why. I just want to keep "friends" and "business" totally separate.
It's also possibly a subtle dig at go, because unlike other languages go does not use dynamic linking, meaning bugs in libraries require recompilation (has positive effects too).
How they respond to the Trump administration when it's in power will tell us a lot about what's happening at wikileaks.
But it seems like the world needs more diversity in Wikileaks-like services. I feel like they have done important work in the past, and it would be a shame for that to end.
They've deleted Skype numbers from my account without warning. Someone linked my and my wife's account because we used them on the same PC, and refuse to unlink Skype and Microsoft accounts.
I'd love to find an alternative, but given that everybody already has Skype accounts the lock-in is pretty significant.
Don't much like the alternatives Stallman proposes. Using long distance phone calls seems worse than Skype, phone companies have provided governments with even more access to user data than most tech companies.
For many products, you want to do at least some research before ordering. For products you order regularly, reordering is usually only a couple of clicks/taps.
I just read through their Yelp reviews (shockingly they're pretty good). What surprised me most was that doctors were sending people to Theranos centers to get tested. Perhaps the doctors should be similarly liable? FDA certainly screwed up also.
You're second point feels like a bigger issue. VCs seems to make some absolutely awful and huge investments in healthcare/science/biotech. Throw 100s of millions at companies based on the CEOs personally, and seemingly do little to no DD. I don't get it.
This attitude crushes many potential companies. Particularly science-based startups with CEOs with the ability to execute, and good technical background but who can't sell as well as someone like Holmes.
If we could get VCs to make saner decisions in health care that would be a major step forward for society.
The article is really about the death and re-birth of Activision. It covers the role the Baer patent played in this, rather beautifully.
I was really impressed by this great long read, will have to go back and read the rest of these articles. We so often focus on success, it's interesting to read detailed accounts of how things fail.