257 karma · joined May 22, 2011
Generally the only "demand" I ever see follow accusations of creepiness online is "please stop".
Fair enough, I can see all that as a reason to distance yourself from the skeptical community. There are a lot of communities I should, in theory, have something in common with (gamer culture, for instance, or his own example of /r/atheism) that I reject because I can't stand much of their behaviour.
However, the author goes too far in outright rejecting skepticism and dismissing its value. I think it is important that there's a group of people protesting homeopathy's use in hospitals and disproving the claims of anti-vaccers and blocking creationist teaching laws. You think psychics provide a little bit of entertainment or false hope? Just a few weeks ago, Amanda Berry was found alive, years after Sylvia Browne had bluntly told her mother that she was dead. Berry's mother died in the interim, thinking her daughter had been murdered.
And the rant on Reagan and bankers comes out of nowhere and commits much the same fallacy as Dawkins "Muslima" comment (minus the Islamaphobia). The idea that, just because there are bigger problems out there, no one should deal with the smaller ones. If someone chooses to devote their time to exposing alt. med. con artists, should we really be mad that they're not curing cancer or investigating financial fraud? It's absurd.
There are several factual errors as well. Right after his complaint that skeptics simply take the word of big pharma, he mentions Ben Goldacre but he doesn't mention that Goldacre is a prominent opponent of big pharma research practices, as are many skeptics, and he's the author of an entire book about them, Bad Pharma. He greatly overstates the use of alternative medicine and seems to have the common misunderstanding that the placebo effect is something you only get from treatments that do nothing. A scam artist treating you nicely gives the same benefit as a doctor treating you nicely, but the doctor will also provide some actual working medicine while he's at it.
Honestly, I think part of the problem with the Sonic franchise since it went 3D is that there's been too much innovation. Every game has to have some "revolutionary" new feature without the basic gameplay being polished - three characters at once in Heroes, cars and guns in Shadow the Hedgehog, the mach speed zones, vehicles, and telekinesis in Sonic 2006, the swordplay in Black Knight, the list goes on. I've always thought they would've been much better off going back to the style of the Sonic levels from the Adventure series, perfecting that, and then building on it with new features.
That's more the approach Nintendo took. Super Mario 64 laid the solid groundwork for all the 3D Mario games since and Sunshine and the Galaxy games were able to play with the formula a bit.
Because you just want to get out of there as fast as possible and escalating into violence is likely just going to draw it out?
Because you're afraid bystanders will take his side and you'll be seen as the aggressor?
Because there's a lot of cultural pressure for women to ignore sexual harassment and you don't want to "rock the boat" that badly?
Or how about because these are grown men and women in an at least semi-professional environment and the idea that they should have to resort to violence to solve their problems is completely fucking absurd?
But this was a lacewing with an unusual colouration and thousands of new insect species are discovered every year. If biologists and museums got all worked up and dropped everything they were doing over each one, they'd never have the time or money to do anything else.
Basically, I've never watched an LP instead of actually playing a game and I've actually avoided watching LPs of games I intend to play at some point, just to avoid spoilers. There might be a few people who have but, overall, the marketing benefit outweighs the downsides (unless, of course, you release an awful game that gets famously ripped apart).
Interestingly, Michael "slowbeef" Sawyer, the Something Awful goon who's credited with creating Let's Plays, can't stand a lot of YouTube Let's Players. He and diabetus do Retsupurae [2], which is basically them commenting over other people's commentary tracks and mocking them.
[0] http://lparchive.org/Sonic-The-Hedgehog-2006/
The latter seem to be referencing a tabloid scare from two or three years ago about supervised housing for families of repeat offenders (which wouldn't necessarily have involved cameras, according to the top result). There are also some results about the legality of installing cameras in private homes in the UK, which makes sense as a search.
Anyway, you would never really talk about "installing" roads, daycares, or homeless shelters. Traffic lights and dictators, maybe, but Google's auto-suggest is not an objective measure of anything.
Sega also made a series of big hardware blunders before they bowed out - the Game Gear (not a disaster, but hardily the Game Boy-killing Holy Grail they needed), squeezing life out of the Mega Drive with the Mega CD and the 32X, the various design and marketing blunders that scuppered the Saturn, and then the failure of the Dreamcast (which wasn't actually a bad device, it just had the misfortune of going up against the PS2).
But in an article about male and female relationships and sexual attraction? It's a pretty bad sign that the author just assumes heterosexuality for everyone, especially when anything else would defeat (or at least greatly complicate) their argument.
Clones have also started to appear but it's still small indie companies making them, meaning it'll take time before many are at the same level as Minecraft.
However, the bigger companies do seem to be paying attention (an EA bigwig spoke about Minecraft in a Gamasutra piece the other day [1], though he was saying fairly obvious things), so it'll be interesting to see what the genre's like in 5-10 years' time.
[1] http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/167137/Minecrafts_future_...
The app is a (rather good, if I do say so myself) fractal generator for the Mandelbrot and Julia sets but its main innovative feature is letting users see the relationship between the two. There's a unique Julia set fractal for each point in the Mandelbrot set and Mandelbrot Maps lets you see them change in real-time by dragging a pin around the latter. If you zoom in, you can see similarities between a Julia fractal and the area in the Mandelbrot fractal that parametrises it, particularly along the edge of the Mandelbrot.
There are also interesting relationships between positions in the Mandelbrot's bulbs and the overall shape of the Julia fractals, as demonstrated in [2].
The code is open-source and can be found at the GitHub page linked from the Store page above, as the developer's website. It's in a bit of a state right now as my deadline is approaching rapidly, and I'm sure there are things in there that are hardly best practice for Android, but I'm intending to tidy it up after the end of the semester.
If you liked using the app (or didn't like it, or even just thought it was mediocre), please leave a rating or a review on the Google Play Store page. There's also a survey linked in the app's description that would give me even more useful feedback. It would all be extremely helpful for my dissertation (as well as for anyone working on the project next year).
If anyone has any questions, I'd be happy to answer them.
[1] http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/mandelbrot-maps/mmaps.h...
Reminds me of Julian Dibbell's "Play Money" [1], where he spends a year trying to make Ultima Online his main source of income.
[1]http://www.amazon.co.uk/Play-Money-Millions-Trading-Virtual/...
Still, it hopefully won't be an issue here, and this is still a really awesome thing to do.
[1] http://www.theverge.com/gaming/2012/2/29/2833313/blizzard-la...