105 karma · joined August 9, 2013
The easiest example I usually give is with blacks-- computer monitors just can't reproduce the absence of light well.
So even if the utility of the funds isn't consequential, a package like this might be one if the few ways to further incentivize a CEO like Musk.
We've got a bunch of perverse incentives where it's cheaper for the patient to choose the option that's more expensive for the payer. Straightening those out would be a small first step, but complexities of the system and incumbent powers have made it pretty difficult.
Congrats on your launch. You might want to disclose your interest in the product here, though.
This pops up on HN or reddit every 3 or 4 years. I want to say he made it in early 2000s? I was in the cube next to him at the time... my only brush with greatness.
Luckily ninja and ccache do a good job of meaning you only ever do that once (and rsync solved that problem for us). Not that a 20-second compile for a one line change is something I should be content with, but it's certainly workable.
Some get traction, or maybe growth early on, but actual startups don't seem to "make money in a short amount of time"
If they had to tell you your solution was slow, and a linear solution exists it might not be your inability to find it that made you mess up the interview. Get good at recognizing inefficient computation first, then worry about making it more efficient. On the job you can always consult a coworker/google, but if you don't know to do that you're going to ship some slow code.
If you look back in the history of the big and small comparison sites, most started with (if the don't still operate) a gimmick but really are making their margins by being a step in the user's path to buying an airline ticket-- or better, a hotel reservation.
I still remember a week into the first job fresh-from-college me marching into the VPs office to tell him the source code was terrible and they were only still running due to luck. It was not well received (or right)