HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

winternett

3,581 karma · joined May 23, 2010

// IT Software Architect & Exec Consultant Web Design, Branding, and Business Development: Winternett.Com
submissionscomments
winternett··on Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content
The feed is normally manipulated by information suppression concerning undesirable posts concerning their commercial interests (partners and advertisers) normally anyway, I don't see where the regret comes from by having to suppress posts concerning requests from government officials and agencies.

Truth is, once a platform becomes that large, everyone and their peers jockeys to control their image upon it, whether it is an official request to de-prioritize posts, or even a comment brigade or mass reporting, this is the result of a platform becoming far too influential and massive to be effective for commoners, and far too vulnerable to money and influence to be an open and free community.

We all have the perfect inverse of deregulation and absence of moderation with Twitter, and we all know how bad that's going, while the management still tries to transition the mess back into a "pay for play" platform.

There is simply no way to manage platforms that large once they become popular pulpits... We need to return to an ecosystem of smaller community forums and apps based around individual topics that can maybe be aggregated in part or whole to news sites perhaps. And no, Mastodon and Reddit are not what I'm talking about either.... It would have to be something entirely different, more effective, more innovative, without ads & ad buying, with a better system of managing credibility and merit than paying for verification, and far less corrupt-able to work well.

winternett··on 80% of AI Projects Crash and Burn, Billions Wasted Says Rand Report
Most of these projects are too similar in nature to succeed to begin with... Everyone is out to create yet another text chat bot or an image maker and then slap Google Authentication on it and tricks to get people to enroll into a monthly $ubscription... Few are out to be visionary and make products that can be sold to companies that will integrate the tools into their apps
winternett··on Windows Control Panel set for deprecation
For ages now Microsoft has been hiding and over-complicating config management on their OS'es. It should be an issue cited by legal authorities. Task manager for example could clearly highlight processes that are part of the original OS, just to distinguish them from 3rd party apps as an easy indicator of system security. The explorer functionality & file display changes with each folder you open, there is no clear path to system TMP files to clear them, and even in many of their apps, you need to learn an entirely different set of hotkeys just to have an efficient workflow.

I don't know why the company obfuscates and complicates operation of it's OS, but so many others including Android & IoS create ridiculously tiered configuration menus to the point where users get so frustrated with every update that I'm sure most just leave default (nefarious) settings as is.

Part of me thinks config complexity will be baked in to keep certification course money rolling in for the company, but with each mandatory "security" update, we're still getting hacked, because configuring our settings now is just too damn tedious.

Microsoft really hinders other innovation on top of not really innovating itself (as a company) by overcomplicating settings and by adding bloatware & monitorware to it's OS... This is also why there's a desperate fight to cling to older OS versions with every new release. The imposed update learning curve is counter-productive, it doesn't make anything better, and it's mostly the end result of us tolerating monopoly behaviors of the company for ages now.

There should be regulation against forcing updates on us, there should also be regulation against arbitrarily removing features post-release in software that we purchased... As we move further and further away from hardware tools, this practice of tiered control and arbitrary feature removal will become a nightmare of predatory corporate greed upon all of us. Imagine buying a lawn mower, and then 2 years later, you find you need to watch ads on it before you can start it, or that you'll have to pay a monthly fee to cut your grass shorter than usual? Pure Hell.

winternett··on Reddit banned me for developing Geddit
I think the key to keeping a site/app good for as long as possible is to avoid an IPO... The need for dramatic year-over-year profit increase ruins the very fabric of innovation. Reddit also got rid of the very key features to it's initial success like displaying the number of upvotes and downvotes, and a lot of other key things like not collapsing comments, that kept it fair and transparent...

Almost every app now degrades quickly after startup capital fades, maybe we should just all quit social apps the minute they show signs of degrading, because right now most of the content, ads, and people on these social apps are now just as uninteractive, repetitive, mundane, and unrewarding as watching TV.

winternett··on The movement to diversify Silicon Valley is crumbling amid attacks on DEI
You've made no point as to your views, you've only picked out parts of mine and then played higher ground.... There's nothing really to respond to in essence.

Tell me why you're personally against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (With key skills and experience as the primary measure)?

In my book, all of those things work better for everyone in finding success.

winternett··on The movement to diversify Silicon Valley is crumbling amid attacks on DEI
As someone who works in a very diversified company, and frequently hires candidates of all cultures and creeds, the entire "DEI" discussion is deeply cringe-worthy to me, especially the comments under this article.

A company that is homogenous in race and culture turns out products that don't support, they turn out ads that get called out for racial and cultural insensitivity, and actually exclude people that aren't reflected by the population making it's products. Running a company that excludes non-majority race and cultured employees is a deeply political statement that caters to old-world ideals that are dying fast, just like the politicians pushing them.

There is deep rooted bias around the entire world, to act like it doesn't exist is simply coddling the classic narratives of racial superiority propped up for ages by people who are creating a cultural advantage for themselves. We battle the ideal of immigration for some cultures, while other cultures can travel anywhere they want freely, and it highlights a willful ignorance and mentality that is deep rooted, but also contradictory to progress and innovation. It may feel comfortable to only be surrounded by people with the same cultural norms and upbringing as yourself, but if you only live in that bubble, you're part of the problem. Life is far better when we open up to new experiences and people, and that's exactly what diversity represents...

There is a far more fair way to interview candidates, where bias can be eliminated, but most companies foist untrained, unskilled, and politically biased leaders into leadership positions all the time without any sort of accountability. So many companies completely miss the mark on why diversity is necessary, even governments miss the plot completely. There are still so many racially homogenous countries out there build on ideals of racial and cultural superiority that it infects the world deeply in some of the most disguised ways possible.

On the inverse, as Bill Burr cited numerous times [Language Warning] (e.g. -- https://youtu.be/O1xgXJ5_Q34?si=n5XZ2MqPhHHgvSdu&t=195), Diversity and inclusion programs often are frequently led and geared towards the advancement of already privileged Caucasian women, which although rightfully under-represented, rank far above racial minority women and often above racial minority men in terms of pay and responsibility.

They can fight all the political wars they want over this issue, but in my long history of work, I have never seen a culturally homogenous business succeed in the long term, without differences in experience and culture, ideas are stale and tone deaf. It works in all ways too of course, but these days, the biggest indication of flawed leadership is a company or agency leadership photo where the majority percentage of the people in it are all the same skin tone.

winternett··on Show HN: If YouTube had actual channels
So it appears that OP is only using items off YouTube front page as options on channels? I think this would be a lot more interesting if it chose more randomized content, especially having an option for content with low views...

Also, an option to do full-screen would greatly enhance the experience.

I think the biggest issue that exists with current YouTube is that so much is crammed into the UI and viewing experience (Ads, the videos on the sidebar, clunky controls to skip videos, etc...) that ruins the continuity of video content, especially when mixed with so many videos in different formats... It's also the same problem that TikTok is fighting with, it makes for a pretty disruptive viewing experience in comparison to cable TV or just choosing to watch TV shows or movies instead.

winternett··on Show HN: If YouTube had actual channels
Interesting, This is apparently a TikTok-like scroller for youtube channel content, which they should have done natively many years ago...

I suspect they never did this because they never wanted to make YouTube compete directly with cable TV. YouTube content is displayed in a drab click-click UI because they want users to not scroll deeper for the content that isn't sponsored (paid) all the way to the front pages.

The UI of YouTube hasn't changed in essence for ages, it's still page based with only a few (shrinking) trending lists.

I think the reason they do that is because it allows them to control what is prominently displayed across YouTube -- The same concept is used across most social apps, where there are few features for discovering new content. The pages display embarrassing low view metrics on non-sponsored accounts, even when they may have really great content, it's really a backwards way of controlling what trends, and subsequently what makes money for the platform and sponsored creators.

If real choice was allowed on most of these platforms, we'd see literally endless (new) options for interesting new content on a wider variety of topics from creators none of us know, but right now, with shrinking choice, we only see manufactured and heavily co-opted content creators like Mr. Beast, Kai Cenat, Joe Budden, Pewdie Pie, (etc)-- they are usually sanitized, coached, & trained personalities picked based on who sponsors them and based on what makes the most ad profit for the platform. Most of that content seems to be very rigged and fake to me, as they clearly have staff working out of view. I find most of that manufactured (Picked YouTube Influencer) content to be drab and over-scripted... I can't stand watching it on & off YouTube personally.

Interesting channel scroller... The way it plays content also seems to look far more lively than watching YouTube on the regular site for some reason. I'd love to easily see the option to customize what is displayed based on the YouTube channels I already follow, and links back to subscribe to channel content I like while watching. A feed for specifically music-related content (by genre maybe) would be highly useful.

winternett··on How long does music stardom last? A statistical analysis
As a musician myself, who has also brushed elbows in coming up amongst friends within the industry, one of the most vital skills a musician can learn is that avoiding overexposure is the key to long-term survival, just as much as making great music that endures... I know many artists that were very prominent years ago, but now can barely climb that hill again because of overexposure and huge re-marketing costs, coupled with an ageing fan base.

People who follow trends, and try to sound like others is definitely an indication that their career is short lived, but in this day and age, with the way social media promotion works, too many artists compete to constantly be on trending lists, and that easily burns out audiences on them and their names... It's relatively easy to "look popular" if you dump tons of money into music promotion, and labels love it when an artists dominates online, but that also makes them flood out everyone else, and even more important trending topics than music at times.

There can be a huge backlash for bought popularity, and for promoting yourself as more important than other vital topics people care about in their daily lives, as on social media, there is only one timeline and trending list for everything.

Absence can potentially make the heart grow fonder for listeners towards a music artist when well timed, especially if every time the artist re-emerges they put out consistently great music projects... Modern musicians need to learn how to share the microphone, and social media needs to create a more even playing field for multiple artists to coexist in over time, rather than pushing just 3-7 celebrity artists all of the time... That's the key to longer careers in music in my opinion.

winternett··on It's not just CrowdStrike – the cyber sector is vulnerable
Testing in software dev is taken completely for granted by many companies on mission-critical updates... Back in the day, our deployments would get tested on configs new & old and with several different variables, we always made sure deployments went smoothly. Now it seems as if most of these companies hire junior devs and skip testing to cut cost and then just put the blame of failure all on them. Burnout levels are high in these settings.

This whole incident would have not happened if just a basic deployment test was conducted. It's so widespread, it would have been impossible to miss detecting the issue.

winternett··on Collection of Dark Patterns and Unethical Design
I think the #1 dark pattern is how cell phone makers collude with app makers to opportunistically and illegally turn the expensive devices that WE PAY FOR into bugs & telemetric devices that listen to all of our conversations and then privately snitch on us and sell that information to private companies and even individuals for all we know. These devices we buy log our conversations all day long secretly and turn them into text that can persist forever.

As phones are used in almost every aspect of our lives now, the very devices we use (even our cars) are listening to our most private conversations and leaking them to companies with the sole interest of engineering our money out of our pockets faster. It also empowers CEOs and mega-company insiders to run espionage on and leverage anyone they want in the world, as everyone, even government officials and agents use cell phones.

It's completely contradictory to every aspect of law and democracy, as well as creating a loophole that invalidates privacy and individual rights against self incrimination, and it's only going to get covertly worse moving forward unless it's totally banned with sever criminal consequences as a practice. This data can also be tapped into by any interest through data hacking, or if one can pay for the info, as it's logged across everything from the car you drive to every app you use (especially when TFA is involved).

winternett··on The Pitfalls of In-App Browsers
Google and Apple should put an end to it. Not only does it create a mess for authentication across sites, it also deceptively modifies and tracks interactions outside of an app's boundaries, sending that activity back to app makers that should not be permitted for privacy and security issues alone, much less ethical ones. If there is already a browser on the device, that instance should override all in-app browsers... Even the configuration option is buried deep in config menus.

Almost seems as if it's collaboratively colluded to allow the browser experience to be disjointed, especially in social media apps.

winternett··on What Does Banning Short-Term Rentals Accomplish?
Short term rental have always been around. The "uberization" of short term rentals is the problem... Also privacy in the era of hidden cameras, discrimination, cleanliness, and safety issues are all problems that are skirted often by this uberization of the short term rental market. The companies at the hilt of profiteering don't provide proper oversight, insurance, accountability, and reasonable price controls to make this industry last, and they're also driving home buying and rental prices up during the worst economy while not dependably employing nor helping anyone other than people who have enough wealth to own & rent properties at over market value, while putting (the better regulated) hotel industry out of business.
winternett··on EU officials say X's paid-for blue check deceives users and breaks law
Kudos to the EU for taking action where the US hasn't for a company operating within the US...

It's really out of hand how such a useful site has been scuttled and manipulative for so many people that relied upon it, even well prior to Elon taking over.

Paid verification means nothing, but the blue checks have been in lace for so long that they have indicated trust... It's a deeply opportunistic move to corrupt the site by changing rules to serve anyone that pays.

Quitting Twitter is not simply a light matter for many who have grown to depend on it, and now those very same users are being ratioed to the point where their only option is to pay, with no guarantee that that will help them at all.

Based on even the complaints of now paying (verified) users, the site is just scuttled, and the money isn't worth it... It's not about the money for people like me, It's about a deep lack of trust for anything that would pull the moves that Elon has on the app/site. The thrill is gone.

winternett··on Trump injured but ‘fine’ after attempted assassination at rally
I don't know if we can honestly ask how did we get here... January 6th was just one of many shining beacons to let us know that this issue was a powder keg.

Social Media has added a layer of deep disinformation & divisive ideological bubbles that are all largely going unchecked as well, where anyone can be anyone, and where it can be quite profitable for personalities to become incendiary... We're really not holding anyone, nor the bodies managing social media and news media accountable for their actions at all, which opens the doors to sensationalism, and even to embellishment on issues which are normally meant to be commonplace and handled professionally.

I think everyone has had fair warning that the rhetoric would lead to more drama, and the country has ignored it in a quest to line pockets. Politics are meant to be boring, and in order to serve Democracy, it simply can't ignore and even encroach on basic rights of others it represents. We have gone too far in political extremes, and this is the end result, slowly getting worse over time.

It's clear that we need to stop making personal servants celebrities, and to stop watching and pushing politics as if it's a TV drama or Football game, otherwise it's only going to get worse... That being said, there is a lot more organization and agendas involved in politics now than in the past.

Technology now is widely being used against everyone to achieve and monitor goals and progress in capturing profit... Sometimes as tech insiders, we have to be careful about what we implement and even say "no" as a response to being asked to do things that undermine people and the ethical balance of the world.

Profiting off of tech is not good if it makes the world we all live in deeply unstable. There's no castle, even in Maui, that anyone can build to survive political and economic collapse of the country nor the world. There is a better way to do all of this.

winternett··on For the Colonel, It Was Finger-Lickin’ Bad (1976)
3 of the worst corporate decisions they made ever:

1. Getting rid of the BBQ pulled chicken sandwich - Long ago they had it and it was inexpensive to make and quite good. Many people to this day complain about no longer being able to find it anywhere.

2. Phasing out their grilled chicken - It was quite good, and people who wanted a healthier option than fried chicken, like me, simply don't go anymore because it's disappearing.

3. Merging with Taco Bell - The menu is far too big now, and Taco Bell items are lower in quality and cheaper. I think it's the final move to phase KFC out.

When are people going to realize that telling customers what they want, reducing value and quality, and ignoring their complaints is not a good business model?

winternett··on Another AI company wrote us and here’s our response
If I could afford to pay for a reasonably priced Ai laundry & delivery service I would surely do it. If it was done by a robot that also cooked basic meals and cleaned my house, that would be invaluable to not just me, but many. A company that ran that service properly and reliably would likely be very successful. That would likely free many of the people in maid and janitorial jobs to work within the companies that run those services as inspectors and managers instead of in the field... This is how the model works, not just by simply saying that category of work isn't profitable...

A work hammer (the tool) doesn't profit, but the company that makes and sells it en mass (Like Stanley inc. or Craftsman) does.

winternett··on Another AI company wrote us and here’s our response
Ai is ages away from being able to emulate the passion and intuition behind music, writing, and art that humans have cultivated for centuries. It can only emulate that passion even still, so it relies on a theft from human intellect & reasoning as it very basis. This is why in the long run it will become apparent that undermining the source of creativity, and by ruining the ability of artists and writers to succeed properly in innovating nw things, eventually Ai will become bereft of new ideas, and easily turned into a source for garbage, cheap, copycat, and undesired output.

There is also the looming risk that current creators may well turn towards corrupting their work specifically to hinder the corrupt idea theft currently occurring with Ai profiteers.

winternett··on Zuckerberg disses closed-source AI competitors as trying to 'create God'
The analytics and insights they'll generate alone, citing most of these Ai tools are harvesting based on Google accounts, will be staggering in hindsight. By using Ai tools, so many people are surrendering volumes of data that are so much more invasive than Social Media ever could be. As Chat GPT gets integrated into many services, they'll be enabled to build a far deeper profile on everyone that registers, and even a lot of data on people that don't register on the service.

I think we need to establish prominent technical leadership/chief advisor positions within the White House and each chamber of Congress now to be able to establish ethical baselines and oversight before tech managed by private companies turns even more predatory upon public data (Similar to The Surgeon General's Role in authority perhaps)... There should already be solid ground rules for operation and oversight of Ai development efforts in place to control the egos of the people that will have access to all of this user data, those types almost always exhibit God complexes without any real accountability nor responsibility, because most of the people that legislate have no clue of what they can see on the backend.

For example alone, if we though insider training was bad, just imagine how toxic it's going to get when Ai development employees, or a product owner has access to every aspect of social, economic, and business moves of every single company and individual that uses tools integrated across Chat GPT and similar services, including Email and MS Office (without anyone really knowing their data is easily accessible)... It's not a bright future for fairness and equity at all, and there will be far more oligarchs and monopolies than there are now.

winternett··on DoorDash and Pizza Arbitrage (2020)
We've had scam industries like this for ages... If you're old enough there's Time shares, Amway, numerous companies that have sold fake health supplements etc... It hasn't resolves anything beyond money and work being extracted from people with no reward. Valid business, like taxi cabs, are destroyed by Uber and door dash, and the people that work for these services get ripped off. Many of these businesses are purely exploitative.

Even Dominos is using 3rd party delivery services now, instead of hiring drivers, it has made their prices skyrocket on top of already ridiculous inflation. It even prices people out of being able to afford pretty much D-class pizza. Even if the model melts down, the original (more valuable) business model may be so decimated that it won't be able to be brought back.

Our world is suffering from trust funders with bad and amateur business ideas, all trying to become market-cornering monopolies, it's long overdue to encourage them to find better and less destructive idea builders and better ideas by others to fund instead of launching poorly though out and highly exploitative profit schemes.

winternett··on FTC sues Adobe for hiding fees and inhibiting cancellations
CS6 has been running for me well, and likely will keep running long after the company collapses on my offline PC that I don't do Microsoft OS updates on... Great job on that one Adobe!
winternett··on Show HN: Instagram artist finder for music producers
Instead of monthly listeners & who the artist is similar to, I'd recommend searching by the genre each artist belongs to primarily & their current geographical region of residence.

Monthly listeners on Spotify is generally a heavily manipulated number, even for pop artists, that has no bearing on artist skill nor collaboration worthiness.

You can also perhaps base artist finds by comparing who they follow compared to who the searching artist follows, which might be a better indication of compatibility than "Sounds like Drake".

Then I'd recommend a better method of getting in contact with that artist (email address) if they are supposed to be a collaborator, and possibly displaying information about their web site or IG bio text and th4e last post by each searched artist.

winternett··on Cancel Adobe if you are a creative under NDA with your clients
Adobe is the new comcast... Cancellation fees?

There is also no security in using any other tool, especially with this predatory precedent, and especially if you're designing in a web browser.

My best option is to use a copy of CS6 on a computer I keep offline, really all the content aware and other features issued since CS6 aren't that necessary for me, and by going old school, it sets my artistry apart from everyone else.

It's long overdue for people to resist and reject the price/service manipulation fetish model that is exhibited by many major software companies. These companies shouldn't be saddling consumers with higher and higher prices and monthly subscriptions, and cancellation fees... Prices should be going down over time, not up as products mature.

There is no longer an "older software" sale bin at the computer software store for people that don't have volumes of wealth to spend, and that's pretty crazy to think about... And then on the flip side arbitrarily and illegally sunsetting older software whenever they wish. These companies are not even respecting the EULAs they've issued prior, and scraping older promises off the Internet over time.

Fraudulent exploitative software buy/update/service schemes, even in long-trusted companies, are becoming rampant, it's likely profit desperation, but also highly predatory in all the wrong ways.

winternett··on Influencer cartels manipulate social media
We can't simply act like social platforms and apps aren't the primary enablers and profiteers in this ecosystem. Instead of hiring honest tech visionaries, they hire social psychologists to design features that waste time and work like slot machines, while giving little value to users just trying to earn a living or make a name for themselves. These platforms also have no incentive to help anyone to succeed naturally/organically because they also conflictingly sell ad space.

Everything about most modern social media is phony, they even ratio criticism and brigade against truth about their schemes and negative news both on and off their own platforms.

Even Elon spent 44 Billion to dominate the attention game and it didn't work out well for him. There simply can't be a monopoly on attention, but tech is always trying to make it happen in the most underhanded ways, and then turning to profiting from deception when they can't keep it together.

winternett··on Some notes on influenceering
Social media destroys the value of intellect because it limits the initial exposure of posts strategically in an unfairly tiered manner based on popularity. There is no real way to reach others unless you cheat or pay for ads now.

There is no real logical explanation to it's utility any more, as it serves as a casino for scams and ads, it's really no longer a forum for delivering important information and developing reputation in my opinion, because the popularity garnered on these platforms can easily be bought, forged, plagiarized, and sold on the black market, and often if you're highly controversial.

Even the people getting attention these days know their popularity only lasts for seconds at a time, there is nothing durable, and most social media clout is also not very memorable in the long term. Eventually {hopefully} real life interactions will become more important again after the sheen of tech manipulation on art and news wears off.

winternett··on The QR Backlash Has Won. Restaurants Are Ditching Them for Good.
All the restaurant order/pay app developers have pivoted to making the flip-around kiosks that charge 20% and up for tipping now, so the QR code app game is dying off apparently. :\
winternett··on Are Kids Losing Their Love for Music?
Most people don't search for "Independent Music" on platforms, they look at what's displayed on the font page and their time lines... Independent artists don't make it on to either of those unless they pay a lot of money to be displayed there, still most can't match the higher amounts that big labels and sponsors can pay to be displayed first because there's no guarantee of ROI.

I'm not speaking from inexperience, I'm a musician and label owner myself.

You may see indie music on sites like YouTube now, that's because that's what you've previously searched for, but most others have no idea of where to start in finding obscure bands they'd like and the recommendation algos only provide default picks unless you search for specific artists, there's also a ton of drivel to sort through before you find the right artists, supermarkets and gas stations only play major artists on repeat all day -- that's why the streaming numbers are so vastly lower for pop versus indie musicians, and a lot of people are completely worn out on the process of trying to find good music they like.

winternett··on Are Kids Losing Their Love for Music?
>Tiny, independendant bedroom producers are BLOWING TF UP every single day becayse 5 seconds of their song becomes a tic tok meme.

That is a common trope pushed by platforms like TikTok & IG to encourage musicians to work on the platform. TikTok does not help musicians to grow in any way unless they are already very popular (over ~100k followers). If you become a popular artist on TikTok, they invite you to HQ where they assign you a client manager that gives you help in promoting your account, but it comes with a price. Social platforms captures the profit that a musician reaps from using the platform without paying royalties in most cases in reality. The music business now is a broken system of payola if you ask artists that weren't born rich.

TikTok is also on the way out as an option as well, as it is supposedly going to be banned in September this year.

winternett··on Are Kids Losing Their Love for Music?
I find most of my music on YouTube as well, and many artists are making ground, but they hit a ceiling. I'm an indie musician myself, so I'm speaking from experience. When you see an indie musician's music on YouTube, 9 times out of 10, they're paying money to promote it on the platform. Streaming sites pay very little, so very few artists make that promo money back until they go on tour, and even then, unless you're selling major volumes of tickets and albums, as a musician you only break even if at all behind the scenes.

The thing is, for musicians, if they spend a lot of time on their work, they don't get paid anywhere near what they should, even after years of work, unless they break into the level of being on TV and Radio, most artists don't have health care or even enough to pay rent.

Just because we may know about certain musicians, doesn't mean they are doing well off of their music, tons of musicians secretly have day jobs, while the tech industry makes billions. Modern musicians often sign record contracts and find themselves in a lifetime of debt before they can even earn their first check, this is what most of their listeners don't know.

winternett··on Show HN: Pls Fix – Hire big tech employees to appeal account suspensions
If you post "locked out of my account on *" almost anywhere on social media, a bunch of bots flood you with advice on who to contact to be reinstated.

From my perspective, lockouts seem to be an unchecked extortion ring run by social media employees and/or on platforms to make money... Social Media in itself has always been somewhat of a grift, and it's created all kinds of opportunities for scammers to be faceless and to coordinate activities that mislead people... It's shameful, but all part of the building story that will be epic to read when it all collapses.

Social media pushed NFTs, Crypto, Influencer Culture, and all kinds of other "Fake It Till You Make It" schemes, we can really do without it and go back to independent web communities, it will be painful for a little while of course, but far better than just getting 30 views on a post promoting your business because you didn't pay them money for more views... Social Media has always kind of been extortion in a way, they want your time and money for returning very little entertainment/business value.

← PreviousPage 2 of 34Next →