435 karma · joined July 1, 2009
There's also the open source KeyCloak project from RedHat. [2]
Also I believe Connect2ID is FOSS. [3]
The power of OKTA lies in its thousands of pre-configured SSO relationships. It's important to remember that each one was set up manually with a unique client ID and secret, metadata file, etc.
Application integration is the most difficult part of most identity and access management projects. That is why outsourcing identity to a SaaS provider like OKTA or OneLogin is so appealing--they have done all the hard work for you.
There are no open source projects like OKTA because if you're using open source software, you will inevitably have to integrate and test each application you want configured for SSO.
http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#acrSema...
Read this for some background.[1]
Net-net, it depends on how sensitive the data is that your are protecting, and whether you prefer increased security or ease of use.
Yea..many people only remember the failed OpenID 1 & 2 specs...so, out-of-the-box there is some developer fatigue associated with Connect. However, federation standards have proven to be pretty sticky--SAML was written 10+ years ago. Hopefully as Connect continues to be developed, marketed, and implemented by developers, it will over shadow previous unsuccessful versions of the protocol.
[1] http://gluu.org
publicaly -> publicly.
A few stats at a quick glance...
- US is responsible for nearly 1/2 of all gov't requests to Twitter for account info (2,520 / 5,676). 82% of those requests resulted in information being produced.
- US info requests specified 8,000+ accounts, translating into >60% of all accounts specified.
- Turkey's gov't responsible for ~40% of account removal requests...a staggering 1,781 requests, reporting 15,000 accounts (75% of all accounts reported during the term!)
http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/21/12994362/allo-privacy-mess...
I had a feeling Google's representation of their respect for user privacy was too good to be true. Clearly they only have an interest in marketing privacy, as opposed to actually delivering effective privacy controlling tools and features.
Does anyone know which research he's quoting?
Either way the UK gov is looking highly incompetent.
I encourage anyone who cares about seeing a fair electoral process sign this petition to remove her from her post: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/remove-debbie-wasserman?sou...