85 karma · joined September 17, 2017
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thelocal.se/20171214/what-s...
Please.
1)if a driver accepts my fare and then tries calling me to weasel my destination out of me so he can choose whether or not to actually pick me up, my choices are to cancel on him, wait until he gives up hope, or use the compeitor. In all three cases, I am denied the option to rate this driver as we never actually took a trip together. It's a shitty experience that allows these drivers to go unpunished.
2)if my driver is driving in an unsafe manner, i am stuck with them until my destination or have to make them pull over somewhere and sit alone in an unsafe location and wait for another ride.
These two items make both services terribly unreliable for those of us who don't live in the big cities. And even then, cancelling on a particular driver or hailing from a competitor usually leaves you with the exact same driver accepting your request over and over. There is no way to block drivers. And even if there was, there is no way for my fellow riders to know they should block these drivers.
Your assertion that we should just lie down and take it like sheep is bullshit.
Choosing to buy local and locally sourced goods is preferred by more people than you think.
I wonder if the man hours wasted on hunting through someone else's code to figure out the bajillion abstracted functions are doing when you are trying to make a change outweigh the minor inconvenience of copying and pasting changes are? Yes the latter introduces more opportunities for errors, but are they more than knowing all your dependencies and ensuring your changes don't break their expectations? Unit tests are only as useful as the man who knows the future.
Increased jobs, in the case of walmart, come at the price of workers having to apply for foodstamps to live. Cheaper prices come at the cost of driving local stores out of business. Google and amazon are shitty companies too, no matter how much they pay for good PR.
Patreon is worse at this point because they have already demonstrated they will seize and/or not distribute funds to accounts they dislike. That's one step above Paypal levels of horrible business practices.
The future will be a new snazzy term. Same job, different title.
Software development is not engineering.
Even if you're buying.
The postal service owns tons of valuable land and also could easily charge amazon, etc. competitive rates when abused for their last mile services.
I'd rather my postal service not be treated like another shitty wall street commodity. We all benefit from its continued existence, warts and all.
What did going public allow the company to do that it was unable to do prior to selling out? Did they just need the money to keep paying for bandwidth? Because that's the essence of the 1990s dot com game, with private venture capital being replaced by wall street investment firms.
Unreasonable demands for 'projected growth' is what always kills companies who otherwise, would be maintaining just fine.
I abandoned Slashdot after their horrible redesigning and forcing all users to use the ad laden pages.