328 karma · joined January 25, 2017
I am not complaining about the repeat. It’s just that I find it very amusing to see different people kinda-sorta reinventing the wheel (and discussing the nuts and bolts) again.
There’s no one good answer. Instead we must design our system to be “soft” i.e. malleable - able to evolve as the world evolves.
The airplane guy had more complications than ruptured lung but apparently he had just came out of scuba diving into the plane.
What am I missing here?
Honestly speaking I am really amazed by these researchers ability to separate and then “shove” an anti-proton in a Helium gas.
Don’t forget to commit your changes if you’re going to `reset --hard` later!
Most linux distributions come with python installed. Anything more than invoking a binary and redirecting the output? Just write it in (pure) python I say!
Edit: by pure Python, I mean don’t require any `pip install`s
I get your sentiment but this is really exciting news in the chess community. A win after so many years!!
Where/which move did Ian make the mistake?
Anyways, hats off to everyone involved. Magnus, Ian, commenters, and the chess twitterati. What a game! ~8hrs!!!
The fact is that ssh tunnels are bound to an interface on one side and the other can be any (reachable) host:port. So if example.com:1234 isn’t reachable from your host network, you can do a local port forward to example.com:1234 from an intermediary host that can reach example.com:1234
And that if my WiFi shouldn’t be part of Google’s (and Microsoft as well) data collection I need to suffix my SSID with _optout_nomap??
This has to be a joke. Any docs/refs/links?
The one resource that I have bookmarked decades ago and would highly recommend to get the ball rolling are the TLDP pages on bash:
https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Bash-Prog-Intro-HOWTO.html
https://tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/index.html
https://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/
Not certain if they’re up to date or error free but I really enjoy the style and tutorial/show by example nature of the TLDP
Should we ban cash?
Not that that’s a good or bad thing. You wouldn’t want a “non-expert” to evaluate the proposal. And perhaps a tapering of the funding is better indicator of interest/progress of the field?
It’s easier to express because Englisch is _the_ lingua franca of those fields. It would have been a totally different case had some other language, say French or Mandarin had been at the forefront of scientific literature advancement and dissemination.