3,053 karma · joined September 8, 2018
because "open"AI logs everything that goes in and out of the model?
- "an active process of aid" etc. Trying to describe simple or obvious things using vague language with a sort of "conceptual" flavor or affectation. It reminds me a little bit of the "translation" of Ecclesiastes in Orwell's Politics and the English Language but it also has its own distinct flavor. The French are probably to blame, somehow.
edit: Blah blah blah Foucault a few paragraphs in. You can't make this shit up
Where is this generation's Carnap?
What kind of read is sufficient to trigger this? If dota makes a read watchpoint with ptrace, my cheat process calls the linux equivalent of readprocessmemory on the dota process, then dota gets notified by the kernel? So every time a process directly interacts with the memory of another process, the kernel has to look through a list of which processes have called ptrace and run some kind of handler? As an aside it seems like this would be bad for performance of the whole OS
If ptrace is a syscall and ptrace (according to wikipedia) allows one program to intercept and manipulate another program's syscalls, then couldn't I just launch my cheat first, have it ptrace dota, and intercept dota's ptrace call, so that the read watchpoint never gets set up in the first place?
And if the actual web server is behind a service like cloudflare, the state can just ask cloudflare for the IP of the real server, then ask the datacenter who owns the server at IP x ...