1,311 karma · joined December 13, 2018
Ah but is it in (insert any ad business big-tech company)'s best interests to do this? Do they already have so much data that these user <> LLM interactions are only marginal that they don't care about harvesting the data ?
They have a tool called DataGrip as well [1]
I learnt to deal with sales types and ensure that my engineers don't get crushed with conflicting priorities (my main job actually).
Term insurance is just that : if something happens to the insured, his/her family get the benefits .
I bought it when my Apple watch didn't yet have a sleep tracker and have used it for the last 2 years. Good one! Has helped me understand what works for me and what doesn't. I use the iOS app for analysis.
A sample of my findings :
1. I sleep very well when I have done some hatha yoga exercises + eating early
2. I sleep pretty well when I eat early and eat mostly salads
3. Beer ruins my sleep (no surprise, really!)
4. Cheesy/foods heavy in spices make my sleep bad and my energy levels in the morning low
[0] https://apps.apple.com/au/app/autosleep-track-sleep-on-watch...
I personally stick to hatha-yoga (physical stretches etc) and one kettlebell for my shoulder.
Do you recommend any? The one that I saw (recommended by PIKVM DIY site) is 40+ USD just for the capture dongle
[0]https://alexwlchan.net/a-plumbers-guide-to-git/
[1] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Git-Objects
- The distinction between a user and a customer is a big one here. Customer pays for your stuff. User uses it. These two are usually light years apart in terms of what they want
- Fine balance to build for the user but also keep the customer happy
- Doctors care about their work and don't want to change too many things since it there's a cognitive cost
- Any language that hints at making doctors redundant is an obvious no-no (Here's looking at you , AI)
- Long sales cycles. Be prepared for cash burn
- I'll type more tomorrow when I wake up :)
It's a conscious choice: You can use IVF / adoption other means to have kid(s) but be aware that once you take the decision of having kid(s), you can't really go back even if you feel helpless,anxious etc:)
Signed, Dad of two kids
[0]https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/31/science/dutch-famine-gene....
https://core-electronics.com.au/inky-impression-5-7-7-colour...
- Audible
- Some podcast app
- No social media apps. I mean literally none
- Zero apps on Home Screen
Works like a charm for me
[0] https://bit.ly/3zX5N1C -- AliExpress
A while ago I tried a few breathing techniques which were given in a nice book [0]. I really enjoyed the after-effects of the said techniques so I decided to mix and match some of them etc. The effects were awesome .. at first.
After a couple of weeks, I started feeling very low for no particular reason (no dietary changes or anything) and just downright weird. I eliminated one factor after another and checked if my energy levels were OK. I finally gave up the experiment on breathing techniques and restarted what was in the book. I am good, now.
So.. despite a sample size of one and a trial which wasn't random or controlled (:)) , my advice on this whole thing : Get a qualified teacher and do what is taught. YMMV otherwise.
[0] https://www.amazon.in/gp/product/B07WSBS5S4/ref=kinw_myk_ro_...
Leaving aside whether you believe what he says, any citations on being a con man? Let alone the biggest con man?
>For those who really worry about soil and the facts spoken or presented by him, it is a total garbage and it done purely as a publicity stunt so that people will start buying the so called blessed soil from him (??).
Oh wow. That seems like the biggest publicity stunt, then , no? If heads of state are buying into this, this must be a very sophisticated plan.
> Buying the blessed soil (whose soil is it anyway?) will save the soil from degrading? Poeple get to buy some soil samples blessed (!!??) by this conman and keep it in their homes and expect the soil is saved while he happily walks towards the bank laughing about people's stupidity!!!
I didn't see a buy link in the web archive (the link is HN'ed), but perhaps you could enlighten us what you think he does with the money?
> educating people about sustainable living and introducing technology guidance, reducing dependencies and a changed economic models
You hit the nail on the head. This article seems to be about educating people about sustainable living and the dangers we humans pose to nature. Geniunely curious , what exactly are you so upset about? Sadhguru's teachings ? His article? Hidden agendas ?
Of course you are assuming that Adyen is somewhat fairly valued :) . That's the problem with comparative valuations IMO. If company A valuation = company B valuation and company A itself is overvalued, it doesn't mean they are both fairly valued,no?
Fortunate in the sense that I learnt that the only way to reliably value any asset is to calculate cash-flows -- for me anyway. There are a million things (BTC,ETH whatever) in which you can invest and some of them will make money but I learnt these weren't for me because I can neither predict how high/low something can go
> I understand young people whose first investment was BTC 1 year ago and bought at 60k and are -70%. But if you have been investing for 10+ years as you mention then there's nothing fortunate about not having bought BTC.
Investing in company stocks that I somewhat understand, yes. Fortunate about not having bought BTC .. well. I don't seem to understand how BTC can be worth anything at all so I didn't/won't :)
Very subtle difference,though. I am simplifying things here but IIRC, Bear Stearns blew up because they wrote insurance for things they didn't think would ever happen (housing mkt going down) and had a lot of exposure vis-a-vis how much premium they collected (i.e. sold a put -- limited upside , unlimited downside). I doubt ARKK has _written_ put options. It might be the case that the value of the ETF will go down drastically but they won't go bust because of liabilities.
https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/aw/d/0385495323/ref=tmm_pap_swa...
Check out his other book - Fermat’s Last Theorem
The 3 policy changes in the paper :
``` Evidence suggests that three priority policies would have the greatest impact in reducing overall firearm homicide rates:
• Universal background checks;
• Prohibition of gun possession by people with a history of any violent misdemeanor, threatened violence, or serious alcohol-related crime or subject to a domestic violence restraining order. This must be accompanied by: (1) a requirement that firearms already in their possession be surrendered; (2) a procedure for confiscating guns if they are not relinquished voluntarily; and (3) procedures for confiscating guns in situations where a person becomes prohibited from owning firearms after having passed an earlier background check;
• Extreme risk protection order laws that allow removal of firearms from an individual who, after due process, is deemed to represent a threat to themselves or others
```