315 karma · joined October 20, 2020
Does not reproduce today though, and I never had issues with PMC/NIH before that.
Seems that some optimizations went to mold 2.42 and others are not yet released. Wild benchmarked mold 2.40 or 2.41
Oh wow, a blast from the past. Remember reading and re-reading it a lot when I was very young. Seems it is still printed and updated! You can see the 1988 edition in full here https://samoe-vazhnoe.blogspot.com/2014/03/mir-i-chelovek.ht...
* Because in CMake there are several target properties that may be affected by the "parent" (another target which added this target as dependency), meaning that these properties need to be re-evaluated in the context of each root target dependent on this one. If I remember correctly, exact mechanism is that some properties can have generator expressions, and these expressions can reference "parent" target. Now we imagine an app which has some std lib with 1k targets, and 100 top-level executables dependent on this std lib - suddenly we have 100k target evaluations in generation step.
I also tried their strictly mathematical problem description and got filtered 5/5 times.
Edit: incident appeared https://slack-status.com/2026-05/46d9d5d41fbedd9f
You need 7-10 times less instant coffee to make a cup though, so your beans are a lot more expensive in the end. From my experience, cup of coffee is either 2 grams of Nescafe Gold or 16 grams of beans.
On recent versions Shift+Win+- also work, and Win+- produces en dash.
Of course, but I assume you don't really need to install third-party apps to control hardware. In my case Alienware and Dell bloat came from me setting up an Alienware monitor. MSI bloat came from setting up MSI GPU. Intel Killer stuff just got automatically installed by Windows Update, it seems.
> Microsoft Defender
This one I immediately disable after Windows installation so no problems here :)
On work we get CrowdStrike Falcon, it seems pretty tame for now. Guess it depends on IT-controlled scan settings though.
It may be the software problem as well. On Windows I regularly need to find which new app started to eat battery like crazy. Usually it ends up being something third-party related to hardware, like Alienware app constantly making WMI requests (high CPU usage of svchost.exe hosting a WMI provider, disabling Alienware service helped), Intel Killer Wi-Fi software doing something when I did not even know it was installed on my PC (disabling all related services helped), Dell apps doing something, MSI apps doing something... you get the idea.
It seems like a class of problems which you simply can't have on macOS because of closed ecosystem.
Without all this stuff my Intel 155H works pretty decently, although I'm sure it is far away from M-series in terms of performance.
mkdir -p <out_dir> && git archive --remote=<remote> --format=tar.gz <branch> <files...> | tar -xzC <out_dir>
Strangely, github does not support this, so tested with bitbucket.On 5090 same model produces ~170 tokens/s.
My TLP and LPMD configs: https://gist.github.com/vient/f8448d56c1191bf6280122e7389fc1...
TLP: don't remember details now, as I recall scaling governor does not do anything on modern CPUs when energy perf policy is used. CPU_MAX_PERF_ON_BAT=30 seems to be crucial for battery savings, sacrificing performance (not too much for everyday use really) for joules in battery. CPU_HWP_DYN_BOOST_ON_BAT=0 further prohibits using turbo on battery, just in case.
LPMD: again, did not use it much in the end so not sure what even is written in this config. May need additional care to run alongside TLP.
Also, I used these boot parameters. For performance, I think, beneficial one are *mitigations, nohz_full, rcu*
quiet splash sysrq_always_enabled=1 mitigations=off i915.mitigations=off transparent_hugepage=always iommu=pt intel_iommu=on nohz_full=all rcu_nocbs=all rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=1 rcupdate.rcu_expedited=1 cryptomgr.notests no_timer_check noreplace-smp page_alloc.shuffle=1 tsc=reliableShouldn't they be the same if we are speaking about same precision? For example, [0] shows M4 Max 17 TFLOPS FP32 vs MAX+ 395 29.7 TPLOFS FP32 - not sure what exact operation was measured but at least it should be the same operation. Hard to make definitive statements without access to both machines.
[0] https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-apple_m4_max_16_cp...