650 karma · joined May 6, 2016
Their suggestions AI is quite a bit behind Spotify's unfortunately. Dunno if that's by a lack of design or because of Apple's privacy stance -- probably the former.
Yes, which would make it behave exactly like probably every language with strong runtime typechecks. Very weird indeed. It's obviously much more preferable that the code sometimes does the wrong thing without warning.
And of course with static typing, it would be extremely weird since the code wouldn't even pass the compiler!
Whether that's a good or bad thing remains to be seen, but I'm a bit skeptic towards complicating things from the get-go.
Those who have a monthly mortgage payment of $9000. Substract $500 (or more if the government doesn't help you with their costs) for each child in your household.
I thought they actually just use structs and whatever data structure works.
1. It’s not 100x (or even 2x) faster or significantly more stable than Apple Music
2. It’s always easier to make a nice app when starting from scratch versus trying to fix existing older software to be nice
3. Apple did a good job with their APIs
I worked with PHP in '98 (ported a perl thing into this cool new web language) and then much later in 2014-2017. I found much to complain on the second time :) PHP7 is a good update, nevertheless.
Perhaps I should've read it as my first programming book, but that time's long past.
Anyone else had this problem? I'd gladly take tips on how to get over it, since I do honor classics and don't think I'm above them.
I used Linux from 1996ish to 2017 and then just moved almost everything to Apple. I don’t remember the exact reason, but probably it had something to do with Wayland taking forever to stabilize, and the community starting to smell bad. And I’m happy, probably happier than before. Sure, Apple’s stuff isn’t perfect, but it’s way closer to it than any Linux combination I ever tried. The only thing I miss is i3, but turns out, not that much.
I hope my move didn’t jinx the whole platform...
Then again, I do share your concern about hackability. Just a single grand catastrophe would turn the scales over for a long time. And nothing suggests that car software is of high quality currently.
>Do you drive while text messaging
Amazingly many people do, even after being told that it's about as dangerous as driving drunk.
Do you think that web apps are better in that regard?
Or perhaps just go for Apple and Safari, whose bottom line depends on respecting privacy.
Oh no! You were so close!
Then again, if the thing behind the paywall expects money and tracks/mines you, then fuck'em.
I don't know how the Rust team thinks, but I believe that minimizing binary sizes is not a very big priority for them. The cost of a gigabyte these days is, ~0.01$ (or less) for local hard drives, $0.4 for NVME and about $0.1 for AWS EBS...
Technically of course it's cool how small Nim binaries are, and it does make certain things feasible which with larger binary sizes might be difficult.
Mac OS:
- 1.30.1 before strip: 573K, after strip: 380K
- 1.32.0 before strip: 267K, after strip: 178K
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS:
- 1.30.1 before strip: 3.9M, after strip: 407K
- 1.32.0 before strip: 2.3M, after strip: 191K
While I understand that some people prefer this, I prefer static linking to dynamic linking. So much in fact that I refuse to use environments that only do dynamic linking in any of my projects.
Yes, I have to make a few concessions to that because of the idiocy of glibc, but other than that.