Apple tells suppliers to produce 10% fewer new iPhones
asia.nikkei.com
asia.nikkei.com
Look, the reason iPhone sales are slipping is because of China's recent poor economic performance. Apple said EXACTLY that in their last earnings guidance:
> While we anticipated some challenges in key emerging markets, we did not foresee the magnitude of the economic deceleration, particularly in Greater China. In fact, most of our revenue shortfall to our guidance, and over 100 percent of our year-over-year worldwide revenue decline, occurred in Greater China across iPhone, Mac and iPad.
( https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/01/letter-from-tim-cook-... )
Samsung's earnings have also been hit by similar factors: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-07/samsung-m...
A slowdown in China this big is actually huge news so I'm surprised so many people are missing the forest for the trees. It means less foreign investment capital will be coming to the West and might potentially signal another global recession.
Why not both?
What's the SEC going to do? They are in furloughs right now and have no budget to go after anyone. Looking further ahead, if a company has enough money, they can buy off the SEC by getting laws passed that will let the do whatever they want.
I likewise have Xiaoimi products and their Mi Home app for smart home products is awful and a far cry from Apple's polish.
the problem with the chinese crap, not just phones but TVs, pads, whatever, is they literally dump a bunch of decent hardware in there, and just stop. no QA, no support, nothing you can find online - so in a few months when any little thing breaks, or there's no way to fix an annoying feature, it goes in the trash.
lots of stories, but here's a couple. got a chinese phone so I never have to put a chinese sim into my real phone. pretty popular in china, good specs. root it and put a non-chinese OS? nothing, and I've searched in chinese.
About 4 years ago got a xiaoimi tablet. quad core, 2GB ram, mini-hdmi output, $70 on amazon. first month perfect. then - wifi started turning off after about 5min, only fixed by a reboot. no support, no documentation, nothing on forums - and it was sold for about 3 months and then they started selling some identical crap with a different model#. seriously, I have no problem paying $1-2k for a phone or pad. What I don't want is useless crap that wastes days of time and gets me pissed off so I can't fall asleep, a year later on a Tuesday.
The thing is, the Chinese culture is used to half-working crap, and they think it's normal. They pump shit out of the sewers, boil it, then use the oil floating on top to dilute cooking oil. At most restaurants. Phone has awkward interface, security holes, and 1 security update after release? who cares - your thoughts are on rent in a dirty apartment and food. If you order your steak medium - it's well done, because yes, they don't toss the beef when it goes bad - they serve it to you, everywhere.
Buildings use a bunch more cement and reinforcement than normal countries. Why? Because the construction workers eyeball all measurements and just don't care - if you don't account for error, it'll collapse.
Not knocking on the Chinese race (my wife is Chinese), but I am knocking their culture. Zero attention to detail, zero cares, zero pride in what you do. It works there, because life is shitty and you don't care about a UI bug when you're broke, there's no law, and an oppressive police force that puts you in jail to harvest your organs for the rich.
Citation needed. My understanding was that there are some crooks producing the sewer oil, but that it's used as an adulterant in cooking oil and the restaurants aren't knowingly cooking in sewer oil.
This is not Wikipedia.
> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.
‘Citation needed’ teaches nothing but it is certainly very easy to type. It might be reasonable if there is a rule that citations are required like on Wikipedia, but here they are not.
The fact that some behaviors are popular doesn’t make them appropriate. Trolling is also quite popular and so are a lot of inappropriate behaviors.
"The business was carried out under the instructions or consent of the restaurant owners for months, the report said."
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2091125/chin...
Chinese companies are getting better and better. A desoldering device (Zhongdi) and a 3D-printer (Anycubic) I bought recently are my anecdotal examples. When looking at older Youtube reviews and at my devices, one can clearly see that problematic details very corrected or improved in later versions of the device.
Isn't this the same cylce Japan went through? At first cheap imitation, then better quality, then innovation? Wasn't "Made in Germany" first established as a British measure to warn consumers about a crappy product?
In conclusion: there are many crappy Chinese products, but not all Chinese products are crappy. The better manufactures strive for more stable costumer relationships.
On the other hand, Apple has its minority but staunch followers, but it's rather common to diss them or see them as brainwashed fools for spending 1K € on a phone.
This is a neutral opinion, I'm in the middle ground with my 500 € HTC.
They are very popular and desired in many EU countries. Xiaomi / Ninebot dominate the electric scooter business and the phones and home appliances are very popular and desired. I just bought the xiaomi vacuum robot for instance which blows all others out of the water.
Similarly with the Huawei P20 Pro which is one of the most desired phones right now here.
I once had a Toshiba laptop purchased in Singapore. When the motherboard died and I looked for a replacement, the only option was to ship it back to Singapore, which was of course a no-go.
Since then, I've only purchased Apple or Dell laptops, as both of them have fast turnaround times, since they're actually available in my country. Definitely costs a little more, but you can't beat that peace of mind.
When I was a kid, I remember my parent's and grandparent's generation talking about the cheap Japanese crap, and they would only buy American. A few decades alter the Japanese stuff was the good stuff, and the American's couldn't compete.
It's a pretty known brand around here, although originally not because of their smartphone business.
[0] Warsaw University of Technology
Sure but that was one of the sections with reasons. They also said
> While macroeconomic challenges in some markets were a key contributor to this trend, we believe there are other factors broadly impacting our iPhone performance, including consumers adapting to a world with fewer carrier subsidies, US dollar strength-related price increases, and some customers taking advantage of significantly reduced pricing for iPhone battery replacements.
I don’t think we should ignore these either.
Right before your quote they use the words VAST MAJORITY to describe China's impact. And it's not just one section, it's stated at the top of the release in the summary, along with supply constraints, as the reason for the revised estimate.
My point is that almost every other comment here was confirmation bias about things hnews readers think are important. They're not important. They're worthy of a throwaway sentence in an earnings estimate at best. It's obnoxious.
Incorporating the carrier costs in the analysis, are you getting more than $5 in value a day? Because with an Xs max and a noncapped plan, that's what I'd be spending.
So even with that price I'd consider it more valuable than what I'm spending.
With that said, of course I can have a very similar experience while using a cheaper phone so a better ROI but I think that phones are actually our most bang-for-the-buck gadget nowadays.
But we'll see when China picks up again, if Apple is back on it's level or not there - everything else is speculation.
Chinese people also have a higher rate of fixing things when they break and they have specialist repair shops everywhere that can replace any component of the phone, so its a different market.
You can't just look at a market and say "oh, its going down for no reason whatsoever" there is always a reason. Its just a question whether the lack of growth will cause a crash in the overall market now.
Ding ding ding.
There are all kinds of variables driving a global recession but the biggest pieces are the Chinese economy plateauing, Brexit and Trump showing just how divided the Western world really is. America's political civil war just driving this point home even more. These factors combined with a changing climate and a general populace that is only short of revolting thanks to the infinite variety of 'bread and circuses' available to us. It's like this is by design or something...
It could be the other way. Capital flight from China to safer grounds.
Samsung's declining earnings has all to do with the declining memory price. The company had been under pressure to increase production to lower the price of memory products all year last year. Apple's problem is in China, fewer unit sales -- their timing is pure coincidence.
Also note that Samsung's market share in China is almost nil, from #1 just four years ago. The company has really nothing to lose at this point.
I don't think ppl are ignoring it. Appl cannot only be a 'good economy company'. Look at Xiaomi for example in your link, its winning international markets by making good affordable phones. Apple should adapt to the market conditions, like xiaomi did, and give ppl what they want in all economic circumstances. Pointing out that apple is( self-admittedly) a fair weather company is not missing forest for trees.
From your own link
> Samsung loses ground in global phone market as Chinese rivals gain share
> While Samsung still leads the world in smartphone sales, it’s being squeezed by Chinese handset makers like Huawei Technologies Co.
I think I missed it somewhere but where did samsung say that their slowdown is due to 'poor economic performance' of china?
True, but that's why Samsung is hurt more than Apple.
> Apples should adapt to the market conditions and give ppl what they want in all economic circumstances.
There's a hole in their phone line-up about the size of an iPhone SE or iPhone 6. I think the new iPhones are great and there's something to be said to have premium and super premium tiers. Their Mac line-up used to be four different products as well divided in more or less the same way (pro / prosumer and desktop / portable) where in this case it should be premium / super premium and phablet / pocketable.
The pocketable premium phone doesn't exist anymore.
It should hurt apple too right? doesn't 'poor economic performance' mean ppl are buying cheaper phones(xiaomi) vs appl's expensive phones? Chinese didn't just stop buying phones( looking at those graphs) but just stopped buying expensive apple phones.
Apple blaming the economy is like farmer blaming the monsoon instead of admitting that he should've built a reservoir last year.
Alas so far I haven't found any real data, only this chart showing Apple slowing down in Q3 already: https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/idc-smart...
You want to know the main reason for the revenue shortfall? Market saturation. China certainly has to do with it as well, but generally Chinese fluctuation have been offset by other markets...but now they aren't, due to saturation.
Samsung warned on their China demand yesterday.
>Samsung follows Apple warning, says Q4 profit likely sank 29% on weak China demand
https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/sams...
We've known that Chinese consumer demand has been plunging for months now.
>DONGGUAN, China — China’s consumers and businesses are losing confidence. Car sales have plunged. The housing market is stumbling. Some factories are letting workers off for the big Lunar New Year holiday two months early.
China’s economy has slowed sharply in recent months, presenting perhaps the biggest challenge to its top leader, Xi Jinping, in his six years of rule.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/14/business/china-economy-xi...
The situation in China is bad enough that local press coverage of the economic situation has been censored since last September.
>BEIJING — China has long made it clear that reporting on politics, civil society and sensitive historical events is forbidden. Increasingly, it wants to keep negative news about the economy under control, too.
A government directive sent to journalists in China on Friday named six economic topics to be “managed,” according to a copy of the order that was reviewed by The New York Times.
The list of topics includes:
■ Worse-than-expected data that could show the economy is slowing. ■ The impact of the trade war with the United States. ■ Signs of declining consumer confidence
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/business/china-censor-eco...
Sometimes a drop in consumer demand in a particular market is more a reflection of the local economic situation than an indictment of a product line that is selling fine elsewhere.
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_business/83...
In this case, it's not just Apple and Samsung. It's a great many other industries, especially luxury goods, that have seen large drops in Chinese consumer demand.
- You don’t know how well iPhones are selling in other markets compared to previous years until Apple releases their numbers for the quarter.
- Even with the new guidance, it’s only about 5-10% lower than the initial guidance. Far from a catastrophe.
Besides it is quite exactly to see that outside first tier countries, iPhones never sold well, no matter what.
The numbers are easy to come by.
What tech company has a better,more profitable business model than Apple? Even long term, the only two other tech companies I would bet on are Microsoft because of Azure and Office (definitely not Windows) and Amazon because of AWS and to a lesser extent the stickiness of Amazon Prime.
And the abnormal price hikes of the new model of iPhones indicate that Apple was well aware of the possible economic downturn, and thus sought to compensate the anticipated fall in sales by squeezing higher profit margins.
But what is their excuse for not penetrating the next biggest market in the world, one of the world's fastest growing economy, right next to China - India?
To me, Apple's attitude in India, and many other countries, is akin to that of a spolied brat who won't do things unless he has his own way. Some examples -
a) Apple management lamenting that India doesn't have a debt-based culture. (That's a broad view - the comment was more on how the cellular services providers don't sell their phones bundled with "plans" in India, and Indians and to buy their cell phones outright which obviously makes the iPhones to expensive and unaffordable to many).
b) In the last 2 decades are so, India has witnessed a revolution in digital payments and seen various innovations in this area. This has made it very easy to do micro-transactions. And yet Apple in India REFUSES to integrate with the local financial infrastructure of the country, and only accepts credit cards / debit cards from Visa or MasterCard for Apple Pay or iTunes. (Note that this is deliberate because the indian options give more privacy to the user - for example, with a credit card, Apple can know our credit rating and better profile us, but with certain indian payment options they will be deprived of this valuable information).
c) Objecting to certain policies of the government (this is understandable though from a capitalist point of view to maximise profit).
d) Totally ignoring the way how Indians use their phones and their requirements. (For example, Indians have been demanding a dual SIM phone for many years, and it is kind of a de facto standard feature here. And yet, it took about a decade or so for Apple to respond to that).
To summarise, Apple's management seems to lack creativity and the COURAGE to step out of thier comfort zone and try out new business models and / or new processes in other countries.
> If you’re going to sell success, you need bigger numbers. With the iPhone XS Plus clocking in at $1500 in some configurations the scope for larger margins and higher selling prices is pretty much priced out the market. Hiding the iPhone numbers means that the focus can be placed on the increasing revenue from software and services, rather than hardware revenue.
[How Apple defied expectations, launched a $1,000 iPhone and made it more profitable than ever](https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2018/11/12/apple-iph...).
https://www.theinformation.com/articles/apples-iphone-prices...
If you have better numbers, share them. Your article has none.
The margin numbers that can be found are also for Apple as a company. Given the growth in services which should be high margin, this means the iPhones margins have been shrinking even with the price increases.
Today was the first time, I saw the new iPad Pro in action in a shopping mall nearby. It was a lazy Tuesday evening and I was in shopping mood. The first thing I did was running Sun Spider in Safari. Not an up-to-date benchmark but still a good indicator for performance. This thing reached insane 119ms. Without having any noisy fans and a battery that runs for days. Then, there is a buttersmooth 120hz screen, also the first time I saw a hi-fps screen live and it's so nice. All packed in some slick enclosure, thinner and lighter than any Surface Microsoft ever made.
I would have bought this device without thinking (this is what malls are for after all) and I really don't care if it's 1,000, 2,000 or even 3,000 bucks.
But tell me--what should I do with an iPad Pro? The OS is not just crippled but utterly useless for any real use case. You don't have to be a pro.
I could work via SSH on a remote server, nah I can't test properly without the major browser being installed or at least Safari's dev tool. Maybe some mockups with Affinity Designer? It has the most responsive digitizer, so c'mon. Nope, the files are so big and exchange to my desktop goes always through a slow cloud, this feels like going back in time and juggling floppy disks. Maybe some Word? No, I prefer full-fledged Word. Contracts are too important to fiddle them together on a subpar Word, I don't open Word for fun, I make or lose money with contracts. If I used this device the entire day I would also eventually get RSI from moving my hand up and down all the time (there is no Vimium for Safari).
This is what I mean, Tim Cook does not have this obsession with details like Jobs had. Let me not start with Macbooks, non-existing Mac Pros or odd, LG-branded screens. Steve thought all features to the end. Tim doesn't and ships one half-baken product after another.
Look, Jobs called Goolge's Vic to tell him that the color of Google's second 'o' in the logo was wrong and hence looked bad on the iPhone. Do you think Cook would ever do this, do you think Cook uses any of his products seriously? When did Cook write the last contract himself? Does he code? This guy just write emails, something a Blackberry could do better than an iPad or iPhone, 15 years ago.
…so does Tim Cook?
> Does he code?
Did Steve Jobs? He knew how computers worked, but I don't think he ever sat down and wrote some Objective-C.
The world is full of people who can code. Very few of them think strategically or understand that code is irrelevant unless it has some really, really good reasons to exist and do what it does.
He is a different human being, with his own set of skills (and flaws) and that's OK.
He certainly does not "just write emails".
I'd even argue that as a CEO, he probably doesn't even interact with a laptop all that much at work as I imagine he relies heavily on a team of personal assistants.
In that context, he might be an avid user of the iPad. As the result, the iPad might be the perfect device for all sorts of high ranking tech executives. Turns out you and I are just not the target market :)
Now Steve Jobs is gone, Tim Cook still knew how to make products into real stuff that can be shipped to customers but there is noone to give him a vision.
I’d argue that Apple’s focus on thinness, lightness, the look and feel at the expense of shipping usable products has been its undoing in recent years. No one would argue the iPad Pro is bad to look at, its problem is that it’s fundamentally unsuited to the use case of its target audience.
I haven’t felt that way in a while. There’s nothing really new that apple is doing at the moment. Thinner devices that’s im going to wrap in a case are great. A higher resolution is nice. Deeper blacks and face recognition instead of passwords? Okay cool. Certainly not worth $1000 to me.
Don’t get me started about the MacBook Pro. Some how apple managed to take a very fine machine and in 2016 decided, “You know what? Let’s just take a massive dump on this thing and add a Touch Bar.”
No, but was apple watch less an achievement than iTunes? No.
Face ID? i like the idea of my hands controlling something. Face ID with Touch ID should have been a no brainer. different usecases! Face ID doesn't work when the phone is on my desk and i just want to quickly fire off an action like changing music- i HAVE to show the phone my face - which quickly changes the dynamics of how i feel about my device(goes from boss-employee to the other way around)
sorry but i guess i'm in the small percentage of people that apple designers just flat out ignore coz they can
I have a small intertragic knotch [1]. It’s the part of the ear AirPods (and iPod headphones) latch onto. These products—physically—don’t work for me.
That doesn’t mean I can’t recognise their brilliance. (Nor why my market segment is reasonably ignored.)
Face ID is really good. From the way you describe it, I don't think you've actually used it, because the issues you cite don't really exist.
Plenty of real innovation going on.
HomePod isn’t a great device, at least the last generation that we bought. I use Samsung Pay and have no need for Apple Pay. I don’t wear a watch because I have a phone that tells me the time among other things.
Again, I’m not crapping on the engineers who worked these things, but these tiny products are nothing compared to the paradigm shifts of iTunes, the iPhone, etc.
Yes, the iPhone shipped without copy and paste, but that was never meant to be a computer; it was merely "an iPod, a phone, and an internet communication device" rolled into one. The original iPad shipped without multi-tasking (pseudo or otherwise), but it was primarily competing with netbooks, which couldn't competently multitask anyway.
I cannot recall any Apple products in the "modern Jobs era" that were quite as much of a solution in search of a problem as the iPad Pro. The iPad Pro is a $1,000+ product aimed at professional artists and content creators who by definition spend their days working on various assets aka files. But the iPad Pro doesn't have a file manager, just a bunch of kludgey workarounds.
I can quite easily take files from cloud storage like Dropbox or S3, copy them to my local device, make changes and push it back to cloud. Or I can edit directly from cloud storage.
And if the iPad was such a hopeless device for content creators you wouldn't see Adobe bringing their full Photoshop product to it would you ?
Apple's official solution for software like Photoshop? There's a Siri shortcut that will import a photo into Photoshop and delete it from the Photos library. This is what I consider a kludgy workaround.
It is absolutely possible to make the iPad Pro functional for these workflows. But iOS is going to fight you where it should be trying to help.
Honestly, none of my friends care how latest is my iPad, and neither do I. There’s no use case the newer version has that makes me think, “Wow, I need this in my life.” Speaking of which, combine all this with the ridiculous pricing of the new iPads, it just doesn’t make financial sense to throw away money.
They're nice devices for visual creatives and for music, albeit in a rather limited way. (Kraftwerk play live with iPads now.)
But they're not a substitute for the full desktop experience. So you get a clash between Cook's smaller-lighter-thinner aesthetic and the real-world demands of professional content creation.
The result is a very expensive toy you can do serious work on sometimes, but definitely not all the time.
I would expect that the iPad will become more macOS-like over time, especially with the addition of USB-C. I think that means waiting and seeing what iOS 13 brings to it.
It's not Apple's fault Intel/AMD has been producing pile of trash CPU's for years.
Not to mention charging money for mediocre services.
And I love it for doing architecture diagrams and also making changes to building plans for my home renovation. The 11inch model is also a great portable diary/productivity machine. I also have teachers in my family who use it for drawing and projecting mathematical formulas on a screen for their kids which they then email straight after the class.
They are selling well for a reason because people use them for different things.
Doable yes, amazing not really.
I completely disagree about video editing and audio production. Sure it's doable for small family videos, but absolutely not for anything remotely pro.
A portable second display is also a great use for it. I tried to use it for coding, but I really hate the material the smart keyboard's made of (I own the first gen one so this might've changed since then), I just can't type on it because touching it freaks me out. I hate that the chose that material to cover the keys with.
So with coding out of the way, recreational drawing, reading ebooks and watching movies is mostly what I use mine for. Unfortunately that's not anything close to the original promise of its capabilities.
I love it and I use it daily but the problem is when I bought it, I expected to see some support for professional use for it, too. The strength of the Apple ecosystem used to be their app support by external developers --- so, let's say for example, when you bought a Samsung (or even Surface) device with a bunch of new features compared to vanilla Android (or a touch/pen-based Windows), you could be sure that nobody will ever enable you to use those efficiently so they were a waste of time even to consider as a reason to get the device, on the other hand, going with Apple meant the opposite.
Frankly, it doesn't feel exactly true nowadays. Tim Cook's leadership gives me terrible flashbacks to the Microsoft Steve Ballmer-era.
As far as I can see they are meant to compliment not replace. She does the majority of the work in Adobe Draw on the iPad Pro and then sends it to her Adobe Cloud account to finish in Illustrator. Before the iPad Pro she essentially couldn't do digital work. She is a trained fine artist with deep knowledge of oil and lately water painting. Most of her paid originals work was doing murals or selling oil paintings previously. The iPad Pro opened up a whole new market for her.
Imagine a set of tools that rival Illustrator but with an interface that's inspired by Draw.
That would be my dream come true!
I used to have a Surface Pro 2 and ended up selling it because the native version of Photoshop is so unoptimised for a tablet screen that it ended up being even more of a hassle than using a regular computer.
Apple is slowly declining (a percent per year) their market share (they are no longer number two - oppo/oneplus has that position now), next year they won't be number three (Huawei). What happens when they go below 10%? Will developer still deliver applications for OSX? Is there a possibility for the same scenario as it was in the Mac vs PC?
Reality is that modern Android mobile phones are good enough for most. Unless you're really into the status symbol part of the Apple, they really don't have something special. Plus there is no need to upgrade a phone anymore. I bought my Galaxy S8+ a year after lunch (much cheaper) and would replace it only because of consumerism - to get a new phone. Arguably there is nothing that really warrants an upgrade today.
Headphones, while a great move, won't help them in a long run - not enough margins and good competition. The silver lining with Apple is the that they have a growing services business. Too bad Netflix is kicking their ass in video content wars. Siri is also mostly mediocre. Homekit - who knows, what happens if your market share is falling.
Reality is that Android won 3 years back. We'll see if Apple can turn around thanks to their endless coffers of cash. It's not over yet, but they need to do something and not just upgrade what they have.
My last attempt at an android was a Samsung Note3 on Verizon.
Pretty much every app had 3 versions - google/android version - samsung version - verizon version
Locked bootloader so couldnt' really remove the duplicates.
Critical Security update released by a google? Well first has to be approved by Samsung ... that takes a month at least , then approved by Verizon.
Realistically if you saw the security update w/in 3 months that was pretty fast.
So a zero day exploit ... 3 months waiting for patch.
Android really won.
https://ios.gadgethacks.com/how-to/siri-101-use-hey-siri-han...
The only time thst I need to be able to activate Siri hands free is when I am driving. Even my cheap car has Bluetooth with a button on the steering wheel that activates it. It’s much more reliable than Hey Siri for me.
And yes, you use Siri hands free so rarely because it doesn't work (as you acknowledged). That's not the case with Google Assistant which works really great for most people - and I use it extensively (almost all day) - both with my phone and Google Home.
But that aside from duplicate apps, my 2nd more important point was SECURITY. An iphone user w/ phone from 2013 can still feel confident that his phone is secure , an android user from 2013 is laughably insecure.
If you use your phone for any work related sensitive data , and android phone is a huge gamble.
It's true but kind of irrelevant because this is not what Apple was ever after (otherwise they would have pursued a very different strategy, with 3rd party licensing, etc.).
Does it really matter if Apple's market share is declining as long as they keep capturing >80% of all profits from said market?
As long as they keep their target demography on board (both on the consumer and developper side) they'll do just fine.
Steady decline would mean that might cease to be the case soon.
The overall mobile market is growing. And it's growing into emerging markets like India and China which are very price sensitive i.e. less margins for OEMs. So quite likely that Apple will see declining market share but growth in revenue and profits.
Betterer: device + platform (*e.g. App Store fees, Apple Music, iCloud) revenues. Even betterer: device + platform profits. This is what Cook is now focusing on, in light of the world’s most profitable consumers buying phones less often but still religiously spending on them.
As a counter-point I’ve completely quit Netflix because 1. The selection is trash and we never find the movie we’re looking for and 2. I can’t get any movies my kids would want to see dubbed to my (and my kids’) native language.
As a result I buy all the films for my kids on iTunes, because 1. It has better selection, and most importantly 2. it has an audio-track my kids will actually understand.
Of all the online video streaming-services/stores, I’ve only found iTunes which is good enough on these 2 points.
- the Galaxy S8 plus was $785 new in 2017 (https://www.cnet.com/news/heres-how-much-the-galaxy-s8-and-s...). The iPhone about the same price as the iPhone 7 Plus when it was introduced, it wasn’t “much cheaper”. If you bought the iPhone 7 Plus a year after launch, it would have also been cheaper. How long will your S8 be supported with updates by Samsung? The 5s from 2013 is still getting updates.
- Netflix’s profit hovers around $300 million (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-is-growing-even-fa...). Comparing Netflix to Apple is laughable. The Mac makes more Netflix’s entire business.
- Android “won” by what measure? Android phone makers are barely profitable besides Samsung and Samsung makes most of its money from selling parts for other phones. It came out in the Oracle lawsuit that even Google only made $31 billion from Android over the first 8 years total - half of what Apple is projected to make this quarter.
Androids market share is meaningless if it doesn’t lead to profits and is seen to be made up of poor people who don’t spend money.
2) I can put any of the hundreds of versions of Android on the S8, and it'll be supported for over a decade. Hell, I don't even have google's android version on my pixel2. How's that 5s running on the latest updates? Does the answer button draw itself in time to pick up the phone? My Galaxy S (original) still runs fine, with the latest security updates.
2) "Services Business" - he is not comparing the entire apple to the entire netflix. He is talking about apple's failed venture into streaming shows and movies. You are being purposely dense here, not sure why. By your logic Windows Phone is a success because MS makes a lot of money from Azure.
3) Android won by the measure of what wins. Almost all phones are Android. Things that don't lead to profits are meaningless in terms of who won? To us, consumers, who most all use Android, it has won. Who cares what money the producers make? Now I'll leave this to your for a though exercise. Take all the slim profits from all the Android phones, tablets, cash register terminals, cameras, light switches, conference booking pads on the walls, etc. Add all those, for every device running Android. It won by your fake measure too.
2. Yes most users are going to put one of a “hundreds” (exaggerate much?) of versions of Android on their phone and not be able to run apps that requires Google Play services.
3. Apple made two shows - Planet of the Apps and Carpool Karaoke. No one expected those two shows to be a hit. Apple’s Services Business is still 5 times larger than Netflix.
4. Yes for profit seeking businesses, a success is by definition what makes money. As far as users winning they have a privacy invasive operating system on a phone that doesn’t see updates more than 18 months - if they are lucky.
I had the international Galaxy S for 2 years (2012-2014) and it was really great... Then again, I was into flashing ROMs every week or so, so perhaps the original TouchWiz performance was that bad?
I think I fixed the GPS by following an instruction in XDA.... I don't remember, its been 5 years already? God I feel old
The original iPhone was rather underpowered even at the time for what it tried to do, but it was so crazy focused and the vision of what it would allow you to do so exciting, that you were willing to look past it. It didn’t matter that it didn’t have 3G or the best camera. Now we’re in literally the opposite scenario, devices ridiculously overpowered that we wish we could figure out something to do with. Best chip, best camera, best number to write on the back of the box. Boring.
As an aside, I am increasingly certain that the sad truth of the iPad today is that a majority of sales are probably the cheaper models used as Envoy terminals, POS devices, and conference room check-ins. If I count iPad’s I see day to day, it’s incredibly lopsided to these uses. What a waste.
With Steve, you could draw a straight line from the original Mac to the iPad. You could see one relentless mission to tame unusable hardware into a friendly machine through software. You could imagine Steve wanting something like an iPad even with the original Mac.
What’s the narrative of the hodge-podge of devices we have now? Vague speeches about “health” and “AR”, always troublingly highly reliant on the hope others will make use of these technologies. Apple used to lead by example, the first party software set the bar for what others should do. Nowadays there’s just the hope that Adobe bringing Photoshop to the iPad will breathe new life into it. Meanwhile, Apple has not released a new flagship app for the iPad since its original release with iWork and Garageband. It’s been 8 years! Apple can’t figure out a single new app that can take our breath away? If they’ve run out of ideas of how this thing can be used, it doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence.
Wrong. We know exactly what we want to do with these devices.
However, Apple won't allow us to do those things.
A friend of mine bought an iPad Pro before going on vacation so that he wouldn't need to bring his laptop.
He wanted to upload/download his photos from his camera, share them to other people, do some light photo editing, hunt down tourist sites, book train tickets, etc.
He had nothing but problems. My 2015 Macbook Pro? No issues at all.
The iPad Pro went back and now he's back on his laptop.
Are there even reports that iPad pros aren’t selling well? I think they are the best computers ever made.
Seoarately, I think many people cannot afford a device that starts at $800 just for Twitter, YouTube, and Hacker News.
The sales peak you refer to predates the ipad pro.
[0] https://lemire.me/blog/2017/10/03/my-ipad-pro-experiment/
After the iPhone 4 or 5 it's been going no where vision wise.
Instead of curating the store and promoting quality apps and games Apple is actively promoting the 'evil' apps. Apple should be working with apps and games publishers on other platforms to port their successful titles to iOS- instead Apple is only interested in taking their 'cut'.
Right, it's all iterative. Where's the next $100Bn product?
The only genuinely new product that Cook has brought to market is the iwatch (although they seem to have been working on self driving cars)
Well yeah, they were both imagined (and the Mac, more than imagined - most of the parts invented/built) in the early 70s at Xerox PARC, Jobs heard about/saw them there. Sorry, maybe you know that, but it didn't sound like it.
Jobs just wanted the software engineers to blow up the iPhone interface for the iPad. The fact that the original iPad had any affordances for the larger screen was because of engineers’ push back.
Unfortunately, the only sources I have are interviews from Nitin Ganatra, who was over some of the iPad apps at the time, from the Debug podcast.
Apple has not released a new flagship app for the iPad since its original release with iWork and Garageband.
In its whole 40 year existence, Apple has usually just made barely passable apps and let third parties produce the high end apps.
The exceptions were the original Apple // version of AppleWorks, ClarisWorks and maybe FileMaker.
Edit:
Corrected spelling.
Its Nitin Ganatra
There is a purpose to every device that Apple makes and I would dare say that they are doing it more successfully than any other business when you define “success” by profitability:
- the iPhone - no other manufacturer is making significant money on mobile phones except for Samsung and estimates are that even they make around a fifth of what Apple makes. The “vision” of the iPhone hasn’t changed. It’s a pocket computer and a good camera.
- iPad: the high end Android tablet market is dead. The PC 2n1 market is doing okay when it comes to volume but profitable it’s not. The non Pro iPad is a consumption device mostly, but the two largest software companies - Microsoft and Adobe are taking the iPhone very seriously and just because it isn’t great for developing, it’s becoming a lot better for other Pro users.
- the Apple Watch - I don’t need it but it’s better in execution than any other smart watch and it’s allowing people to leave their phone at home and of course health and fitness.
- AppleTV: Unlike the Roku (and I have three Roku TVs), they make money the old fashion way - I give Apple money and they give me a box with much better performance than any other settop box without trying to monetize me with ads and without a remote with buttons that go to the highest bidder - unlike one of Roku remotes that have a hard coded button to RDio.
- Mac: a well built computer that I can open up without it looking like a NASCAR car with stickers and crap wars.
HomePod: I got nothing....
But for the past decade, they haven’t really made any interesting software. iOS is great for iPhones, it’s not great for a laptop replacement. I think OS/x would be a much better fit for the iPad Pro, but perhaps something completely new would be even better? I think the surface book shows us just why that is by the way. If I didn’t personally find windows so terrible, I would leave Apple for one of those in a heartbeat.
It's not so different from other companies (e.g. on Android, Google used the Linux kernel, but replaced all other userspace components of the traditional GNU/Linux distro by non-copyleft versions, including developing their own libc).
I do this because I myself primarily buy Apple products for their software. It’s anecdotal of course, but I own a MacBook Pro because I like OS/X more than Linux, and, certainly more than Windows, not because it has a touchbar. Similarly I primarily own an iPhone because I much prefer iOS to Android. I also prefer iCloud services and iMessage to all their similar options. In fact my biggest grief with the iPhone isn’t the missing headphone jack or the ludicrous price tag, it’s that Siri is so much worse than the other voice assistants.
Maybe that’s just me, but I suspect I’m not alone, and that’s why I think their core problem is software rather than hardware.
Rather think of a regular consumer, of which there are a lot more. Just doing a bit of browsing on the sofa, writing a few emails, reading news, watching Netflix in bed or playing some game.
Personally, I read a lot of papers and ebooks I get via university on it. It's great for that. Not once did I want to use SSH on it, with or without an external keyboard. I use a proper laptop or computer for stuff like that.
Apple advertises it as such.
Many artists praise the Apple pencil and we musn’t Forget that creative industry is probably what kept Apple afloat during it’s dark age of the 1990’s so I’d say fair enought!
I have literally no use of an Apple Watch or an iPad. But does it bother me than Apple sell them and make big margin on them? Why on earth?
But I do have to agree with the sentiment that it’s software is a major problem. I think a lot of creative pros make things using several files, and organise their work by projects. iOS’s app-based organisation philosophy is consistently painful. So annoying, in fact, that I would probably never try to do anything remotely complicated on this iPad, even though it’s the fasted computer I’ve ever owned.
On the hardware front, a 13” screen is no where near big enough for most creative work. I really think Apple needs to be way faster in scaling this thing up to 20+ inches.
The hardware will come, but I worry that the whole philosophy of iOS is simply wrong for complex work, and it would take a lot of vision and courage from Apple to fix that.
And like another commenter said, not every "Pro" user is a developer. I for one just take the Pro as meaning, better/faster.
And if someone wants to Shell out 800+ for such a device that's fine with me. But just because it costs a lot doesn't mean I can do anything with it. I also don't expect a good SSH experience from a Garmin 5X Plus.
Steve made Apple great but it's an illusion to think a company will grow forever.
Steve was also lucky to have Apple in a time where a lot new stuff was developed. He didn't develop it, he applied it the right way. Things like touch screen and tablets were really new back then.
But today there is not a lot that is new. VR is from the eighties, so is AI.
So I think even today Steve would have troubles to keep Apple growing.
Taking advice from the same audience who said in 2001 “less space than the Nomad, no wireless, lame” hasn’t proven to be a winning strategy....
With that said, there are plenty of improvements needed. File handling is certainly one of them. How to get my RAWs into LR for example is a pain.
> Steve thought all features to the end.
This is simply not true. If you were lucky enough to have your use case match Steves exactly, then maybe.
Reduce this down to as low as possible, and you will see a huge renaissance. 12% (like Epic) seems reasonable. Apps should cost $500 to launch and $100 yearly to maintain on the store, to ensure quality.
Your point on sharing files via the cloud would also apply to laptops on Wifi as much as to iPads. Yes you can tether with a Cat-5 on a laptop, but most people don't bother and do pro work just fine.
I was worried the iPad would get neglected since Android for tablets is practically abandonware at this point so it has no credible competition at the high end, but instead they're doubling down on the hardware and the software. iOS 12 for iPad was a huge upgrade and the larger screen sizes make running multiple apps side by side a lot easier. sales may have flattened, but they're consistently selling twice as many iPads as laptops.
Jobs didn't want the iPhone to have apps at all. The original vision was for all third party software to run inside Safari. This is the same man who didn't want slots in the Macintosh, and killed the floppy drive as soon as he returned to Apple.
Jobs would have loved the iPad Pro.
Makes me want to go back to a flip phone.
You mean, like iPhone XS?
That's not even including the very different screen interactions on XS vs the iPhone 8, where the screen itself was significantly smaller.
[0] http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/smartphone-thumbs-2012-9...
I previously had a Note 8 for work and have just gone back to my Galaxy S7 which, while still big, is much nicer to use - even though I thought I liked the Note while I had it.
The major difference between X/XS and 8 is the weight. And this make the whole phone felt very different.
Slightly larger for every iteration over years and years makes it much, much larger in the end.
I refuse to go for anything noticeably larger than the SE.
Please, phone manufacturers: if you hear this, listen. I do not care about large phones. I couldn't care less about "screen-to-body ratio". I don't want a notch or a stupid sliding mechanism. I want a simple, small phone. It should have excellent battery life (don't care about thickness), be sturdy. Calls, texts, pictures, and emails are about all that's necessary, along with occasional web browsing and music playback. Maybe a reader app. That's it. But I guess you can't charge $1,500 for that.
Edit: Oh yeah, and leave my headphone jack alone. Seriously.
The market. Small phones don't sell well unless they're at a significant discount. Or else Sony would have owned the Android market with their Xperia Compact series.
For a majority of users, their phones are their #1 computing platform. For many, it's also their ONLY computing platform. They need all the screen real-estate they can get.
As an SE-owner, I suspect you misspelled iPhone 5s there.
Customers.
https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=9318&idPhone2...
That's also the number one thing I hear people say when they say they won't upgrade to a new iPhone - they are getting too expensive and their current phone does more than enough. Upgrade so you can make animated poop emojis? C'mon. No thanks, I'll just pay $50 and get a new battery for my old phone and go another couple of years. At the bottom of the article, there is a link to another article, "China turns sour for Apple, leaving Asian suppliers exposed" [1]. I don't think the attitude in the following quote is unique to the Chinese consumers.
> Apple, with its high-priced lineup, probably suffered more than most from the slowing economy. The iPhone XR variant with 128 gigabytes of storage retails for 6,999 yuan ($1,018), while the latest devices from domestic competitors like Huawei Technologies can be had for around 3,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan. [1]
[1] https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/China-turns-sour-...
I played with the phones yesterday at an apple store, and they were lovely. I really liked everything about them, aside from some odd phony bezels in safari.
But not for $1k. It’s not that I think they aren’t worth it. I think they are. Just like a nice bmw is worth $80k. But not to me.
You know innovation is slowing when I don't think it's worth the hassle to upgrade and it's effective free for me (since my company will pay for it).
You'd give up a headphone jack, which is the big dealbreaker for me, but for a price of free... eh, I could see why you might upgrade.
A lot of people really care about the quality of the camera and the overall speed of the experience since they spend 10 hours a day on it. Don't forget that many millennials have a phone but no TV or computer. But equally a lot of people don't care about those things. And probably most of these are like yourself happy to stay on the 6s.
As Tim Cook said as long as you're happy that's all that matters because at some point you will upgrade and you will likely stay with Apple. Just not every year like maybe you used to.
The battery is lasts significantly longer. I kept and eye on my old phone and it was still at 90% capacity. With the 6s, I'd /usually/ make it through the day, but doing anything hefty and I might not. I purposefully stopped charging the Xs during the day today because I was curious and my phone is slightly under 50% charged in the late evening.
I bought a few wireless chargers my wife never used so I tried those. I really like it, especially at night. I think I was using an underpowered power adapter, which is why my wife had problems and gave up on it. My 6s would get pocket lint stuck in the lightning port and a few times a year I'd have to dig it out with something. I think recently the port itself on the 6s was probably getting worn out because more and more of my chargers were finicky.
I really like face id. I liked touch id, but often my hands would be wet or I'd be wearing a glove. It would be kind of annoying to move your thumb over to open your password manager or bank app. Face id is noticeably more convenient even after a day or two.
The camera is great, the speaker is noticeably louder, it's nice to get the shortcut for the flashlight on the lock screen.
I'm still getting used to the OS changes on the new phone. I had to look up how to power it off. Using swipe for Home and the other gestures were pretty easy to get used to. I'm not a fan of using the top-right for control center because I can't use one hand for it anymore. It feels slightly bigger and heavier than the 6s, but I miss having something the size of the 5. I also think it's silly that it comes with a 5w charger.
I got my 6S's battery replaced on New Year's Eve to take advantage of the discounted price. I wasn't actually expecting much improvement, because the phone was only a year old and the battery supposedly had 85% of its original capacity.
To my surprise, the new battery has in fact made a huge difference. It used to be that when I left work, my phone had somewhere between 15%-25% remaining, if that. Now, it always has a comfortable 50%-60%
I replaced the battery after maybe two years and it was a night/day difference.
That's part of why I haven't bothered to upgrade (OP here)
The 6s has a 1715 mA·h battery versus the Xs' 2658 mA·h. This is why still including the 5w charger is silly. Charging with this was already slow on the 6s. It's really hard to quantify usage, especially when the chips are so different. I really noticed the battery life start dipping when I switched to Bluetooth headphones when using the 6s. I'm hoping on the Xs either that Bluetooth is more optimized, but even if it isn't the same draw will drain a smaller percentage of the battery.
The main thing I was hoping to capture in my reply was the little, less concrete things about the update. I usually skip a few generations and a lot of the game changers are small, personal things that don't always jump out in reviews. As an old example, I don't often use AirDrop, but when I finally updated all of my devices to support it, it's way easier than messing with Dropbox, using some app with a web server, connecting a cable, or using a usb or memory stick. Other times it's better radios that power on more quickly, are faster, or more reliable.
Battery life (5S was failing though). OLED screen is amazing. Screen real estate is great. It's a bit to big for my small hands, but it rarely gets in the way (I use assistive touch quite heavily though). Camera is good but nothing I care too much about. Swipe gestures (in lieu of buttons) is great (quick switching between apps). Tap screen to wake up (maybe existed before?) is nice.
I'd say do the update. I can't see myself using anything else going forward (until I'm forced to update in a few years I guess).
Last year at this time, people were saying the iPhone X was dead.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2018/01/21/apple-ip...
I'd wager that consumers have reached the point where phones are 'boring' and increasingly expensive utility purchases, like a new laptop. We're way past the point of "there's an app for that" style ads. Beyond the basic social network apps, messaging apps and games, people don't even bother downloading apps anymore.
Like laptops, a phone you buy today will easily last you 2-4 years (laptops last longer of course). A marginally better camera isn't going to convince people to cough up $1000+ each year when they know the pictures are going to end up in a highly compressed form on Snap/FB/IG anyway.
edit: chart of AAPL stock price for the past 12 years
What we do know is that iPhones are important to Apple and if they genuinely thought that there was a significant market for tiny phones then they would release one. They still sell the iPad mini and the smaller Apple Watch for example so it's not just they they are afraid of small things.
But still you see a lot of comments even here that Apple would be saved if they released a new iPhone SE or some other small phone.
Some of us like small cellphones. This trend towards bigger and bigger screens has only made one-handed usage harder for me.
iPhone SE actually has an older, first-generation Touch ID sensor.
Even though I have big hands, I like a small phone.
I can dream...
The point is that the same thing is, and will continue, to happen to tablets, phones, and various other forms of consumer electronics. There is an asymptotic decline in value gained between iterations. And that asymptote, thanks to the speed of technological development, approaches 0 pretty rapidly. This inherently means that no computing product is going to be a long term sustainable golden goose.
---
The thing I don't understand here is that I think the above is so plainly clear as to be practically self evident. Yet then you have people who are certainly much more well informed on business than myself, such as Warren Buffet, declaring that a $1000 iPhone X is "enormously underpriced" and is clearly going long on Apple as his organization continues to accumulate Apple Stock. I don't understand the dissonance.
Separately, while Tim C may have pointed the finger st the Chinese economy, there remains a growing concern that the global economy is also slowing. China may just be going through an isolated economic change or it may be a signal that other parts of the world are to follow.
With my iPhone 6s, everything I need runs more than fast enough, and with a replaced battery, runs long enough on a charge where I don't worry about it. I don't need a larger nor faster phone. I'm fine with the Touch ID. So yeah, why should I upgrade to even a 7?
I will be upgrading my Series 0 Watch, so Apple's still making money from me: new iPad and new Watch, just no new iPhone.
This year was the least different AND most expensive iPhone so far. So I didn't upgrade, and lots of other people didn't either.
[0] https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000320193/68027c6...
Buy just as likely, as happens every year, unnamed sources make this claim, which later turn out to be baseless.
Why would they do that, I wonder?
Apple doesn't publicly revise their estimates every year, though.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/1/18053782/apple-earnings-q...
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/01/letter-from-tim-cook-...
I know, mostly I'm just pro-signalling. But I am a pro, and my hardware, software and its usage should reflect that.
===
Cut to 2019...
Apparently, they want you to really dig into your phone now. Like, literally dig in. With two hands and a face. It's harder to let go of it if you already hold it in both hands. I guess engagement with Instagram app is higher like that. I don't use Instagram. And my right thumb doesn't reach upper left corner on more than 4".
Cameras on phones are ridiculously powerful. What's good that for me when 90% of my photos are just document archival. It's just gonna eat up my storage. I don't use front camera at all. I don't even own a mirror at home!
FaceID is useless to me. My phone is mostly a hotspot and a notification hub at arms length, on desk. Static. For most interactions, I never face it. Fingerprint works really well.
There's special thingamayings to do with AR and it's another gimmick. I did AR decade ago in consumer-space. It's bullshit. I can see it quite well in industrial environment though. I guess they just needed to fill up keynotes with something.
Notch is a lot of dead pixels in my book. Screen margin space for handling the device is reduced.
Touchbar discourages touch-typing and steals my treasured media/sound/brightness keys. I listen to a lot of music and have pretty good idea how bright my monitor should be at any time.
Butterfly keyboard is supposedly thwarted by some dust. I sometimes use my old MBA even with a drizzle. Plenty of smoke particles around it too.
I get less hours of battery life mostly due to pushing pixels I don't need.
If I wasn't in-the-know, on paper, new MBA would look worse and more expensive. CPU is crap. Storage is way too expensive.
===
Apologies for a longer, what it amounts to, rant. Wanted to get a lay of the land for myself, as my batteries are showing age - almost 3000 cycles on MBA!
I think I've concluded that hardware I got in 2013 was kind of a miracle, not design. A coincidence that happened to align with my use-cases, due to various hardware and economic constraints of the time.
Right now, I'm gonna just go and order replacement batteries for current hardware, and go look elsewhere. But where? For 4" phone, I'm looking at Caterpillar Android stuff, made for people who get shit done. For laptop? I don't think I'll ever find anything that's not significantly worse experience than MBA with macOS. Desktop seems to be healthy in interesting options these days.
Or maybe just wait. I can push this 2013 hardware to 2020, I think. Pretty damn good!
Disappointment abounds.
Make it so! (=
I handled a modern iPod Touch recently. What a wonderful form factor - small, light, but feels durable and well-built. I'd love to get that but with a cellular modem and OLED screen. The rest of the modern Apple features (telephoto lens, Face ID, force touch, 3D touch, etc.) I can live without. Wireless charging is very nice, but not worth making the phone bigger, more brittle (glass back), and more expensive.
I bought the latest XS max because I wanted the bigger screen, faster phone, and nice oled.
Instead of focusing on what really matters in terms of developer productivity.
This is a much better explanation to slowing iPhone sales than people complaining about the missing head phone jack, the lack of TouchID, the notch or sizes. I don't think any of those design decisions have made any significant number of users pick Android phones when upgrading.
For most of us, there's simply no reason to upgrade from the iPhone 6 or 7, they're absolutely fine, and I'm not sure that the improvement in the camera quality is something that many will notice.
I'm not sure if this is the case in the US, but most carriers here don't have a 2 year upgrade plan, you don't get "free" phones anymore. You can get a payment plan, where you pay of your phone over two or three years, but they aren't getting you a new one, not even at a reduced price.
In addition the OLED screen is night and day: you won’t want to go back if you switch, but I’d say that isn’t a reason to upgrade on its own unless you aren’t happy with the current one.
All that being said, like others here I too would prefer an iPhone SE form factor with similar specs. Maybe they will get back there but I imagine it will take a long time for the battery and screen and performance to all fit back into the smaller size.
If you don't care about any of those things then save your cash and don't upgrade.
Also Apple: Removes headphone jacks, quadruples prices, sues people fixing their phones, removes fingerprint reader, nerfs nfc, replaces screws with pentalobes
?
> removes fingerprint reader
…and replaces with Face ID. It's not like they just completely removed biometric authentication.
> nerfs nfc
As far as I'm aware, they've only improved their NFC support as time goes on.
> replaces screws with pentalobes
iPhone has had the same screws for years.
I haven’t used wired headphones in over four years and nothing will make me want to go back to them.
I don’t miss the headphone jack at all.
I've argued this point before, and wasn't particularly in the mood to discuss it again. There are multiple reasons I didn't bring it up:
1. I use an iPhone SE, so I'm not really qualified discuss this. I do exclusively use AirPods now, though, so I have the feeling that I wouldn't mind the lack of a headphone jack now.
2. The removal of the headphone jack was not done in a vacuum; it's pretty obvious that if there was no drawbacks, it would be great to have a headphone jack in my iPhone. But we live in a world where tradeoffs exist–otherwise, my phone would have every port that ever existed in the last thirty years.
That said, removing or not including certain features does make it less of a general purpose device that is less useful to more people. Apple has been ragged on from day one for not including some form of SD card support, an FM tuner and a removable battery. To this day there are people that will refuse to buy a phone without those features.
They might not be strictly necessary features, but they still sell phones, or at least make them viable to the kind of person that demands them, but Apple still sold hundreds of millions of iOS devices without those features.
Then they removed the headphone jack too. To a group of people that were never concerned about the lack of removable media, a radio tuner, and a removable battery and bought iPhones for years, they suddenly lost one feature they actually used and were told to buy a single instead.
I mean if your car’s Bluetooth radio sucks, or you have a very nice pair of wired headphones you like using, or you simply want to be able to plug your phone into a random audio source at some party, being told to buy a dongle instead sucks. It’s just one more tiny little $10 widget which will get lost or worn out or rendered useless in a laundry mishap.
Apple made a trade off, but in this instance, it does not seem like a worthwhile trade off and it does hurt their image when they make some seemingly anti-customer choice like this. Even people that weren’t personally affected and didn’t mind shelling out for a set of AirPods or W1 Beats might change their perception when enough shit hits the fan and is flung in the face of those around them.
Interestingly, my AirPods seem to be defective and this is something that mine won't do ;)
> Apple made a trade off, but in this instance, it does not seem like a worthwhile trade off and it does hurt their image when they make some seemingly anti-customer choice like this.
Every Apple device is a tradeoff. It just so happens that the removal of the headphone jack was a trade off that a larger-than-usual number seem to have taken issue with, though it's not clear that this is a perspective shared by the majority of iPhone users.
Ah! Of course! Sadly there is no warranty replacement for your problem. ;(
Kidding aside, Siri required some work to understand and shape into a useful tool, but it was worth it to me to make sure I never pulled out my phone without the intention of doing the specific task I pulled it out to do, and only those tasks that require me to look at the screen. Phone calls, playing podcasts, audiobooks and music, and setting alarms, timers and reminders basically work. Haven’t found a way to do Calendar appointments in the level of detail and granularity I prefer though, so I just continued doing that mostly on my laptop.
Not for everyone, but once I figured out how to make Siri useful after years of not using it at all, it was the killer app for AirPods. Still won’t tick nearly all the boxes on anyone’s Butler-in-a-Box wishlist though.
> Every Apple device is a tradeoff. It just so happens that the removal of the headphone jack was a trade off that a larger-than-usual number seem to have taken issue with, though it's not clear that this is a perspective shared by the majority of iPhone users.
I’m not at all disagreeing that every Apple device is a tradeoff. I don’t think I even implied that it wasn’t, what I’m getting at is that on top of the other trade offs they have already made, that this additional trade off, for the reasons they did it, may not have actually been a good one, and I don’t think it has to affect a majority of users to still be a bad tradeoff.
If, and I’m pulling this number from my ass, but if 20% of your existing install base is unhappy with a decision you made on a model they would otherwise have no problem purchasing, but 80% are at worse indifferent, then you’ve still pissed off 20% of your customers.
It might be 15%, or 10%, or 5% or something even lower, but with a customer base as large as Apple’s, that is still a lot of people that may not be buying iPhones the next time they do, or might but will be dissatisfied, and express this dissatisfaction to their social groups. It still tarnishes the brand. If this were the only thing that tarnished Apple’s brand in recent years it might be fine, but it’s not and the removal of the headphone jack didn’t happen in a vacuum.
I’m not saying it isn’t an acceptable loss, but it doesn’t look great when you’re removing additional features on top of the ones you just never had.
Or to put it another way, just because you and I don’t care about something in our corner of the world doesn’t mean there isn’t a whole world out there that Apple is, theoretically at least, trying to sell phones to.
This is some very US thing.
Here is my story: i left my cruise cabin in the middle of the night and went to the bow. In shock I discovered it was almost as bright as a daylight - oh my the full moon looks beautiful. I was alone and played the titanic scene for a monent. Imagine me alone, warm summer night, carribeans, full moon and cruise ship gliding through quiet ocean. Perfect moment hard to repeat with all these circumstances. I immediately reach out to my pocket to put headsets on just to listen to some Leonard Cohen’s songs. Imagine my shock when I realized I forgot the iphone’s jack adapter ;(
Cleaning up crumbs?
…that's not Face ID?
With my phone I want to unlock it without taking my eyes off the road so I can use voice recognition to map my destination or make a voice call. The absolute last thing I want to screw around with while driving is looking at my phone.
This isn't remotely close to being true. Face ID and Window Hello (I think that's what it's called?) are quite different, technically.
> Quite frankly the face unlock on the Surface makes more sense than on a phone due to nature of the device. It's larger, more likely to be used at a desk while sitting that type of thing.
Again, I urge you to actually use the thing rather than trying to come up with a mental model of why it's horrible because of your experience with the Surface.
> With my phone I want to unlock it without taking my eyes off the road so I can use voice recognition to map my destination or make a voice call.
1. You don't need to unlock your phone to do this.
2. You can disable the setting to require looking at your phone to unlock it.
2. Not looking at the phone does not change that my face has to be within view of the phone. Honestly, this comment makes me wonder if you have used the Surface face recognition. You never have to look at it; it's actually pretty good, but it is still my personal preference to use a pin. Touch ID is more convenient than facial recognition IMHO.
To be clear, I never said it was horrible, I was stating that it is not an improvement FOR ME. I love the fingerprint reader. This whole topic is about Apple's sales declining. Quite frankly, I wouldn't have upgraded from the 7 to 8 series if my iPhone 7 hadn't broken. The 7 was "good enough". At this stage the "improvements" to the iPhone are incremental and not enough of an improvement to be worth the cost of upgrading; clearly, others agree with me or iPhone sales wouldn't be on the decline.
As a show of solidarity with Huawei, or because they felt that Apple had something to do with it?
If you buy the XS Max with 512 GB of storage, unlocked (which happens to be $1,449.00, by the way). iPhone XS starts at $999.
Edit: Yes in case Apple is ridiculously expensive in many part of the world.
I was given prices in dollars, so I assumed that the poster was talking about the US.
And it is not like this is the first time Apple has been under attack anyway. If you are carrying out Business in China with any sort of Government involvement ( which is pretty much 90%+ ) you need to use a phone from Chinese brand to prove your loyalty.
That's an absurd price for a phone. A brand new OnePlus 6T is a third of the price.
Their new laptops are also insanely priced. The 2018 Macbook Air is more than 2x the price of the 2017 Macbook Air.
I don't know what kind of pricing strategy this is, but it has turned me completely off the company's lineup.
I have no idea what the price is in India, but a 2017 MacBook Air is $999 in the US, while the 2018 model is $1199. Not quite "2x the price".
I believe this tax is actually decided by the Indian government?
Previous gen Macbook Air is INR 65,000 (~$920)
The 2018 MacBook Air isn’t 2x the price of a 2017 Air in the United States. First of all, the 2017 MacBook Air was actually a 2015 MacBook Air with a tiny bump in clock speed. Retail price in 2017 was $999. Retail price in 2018? $1199. The 2018 has Touch ID and retina which the 2017 version didn’t. That’s not even close to “2x the price.)” The tariffs pre-2018 were 15% on computers, now they are over 17%. Then there is an 18% sales tax on top of that! So 35% of the MacBook Air cost in India is just taxes. That means the government of India makes as much “profit” on a laptop as Apple does for making the damned things. Perhaps have a chat with your government about those high tariffs? Apple didn’t double the price, your taxes went up.
I've been using a OnePlus 5T and honestly can't fathom any reason why I would want a faster processor any time soon. And the OnePlus 6T is even faster.
I'm just saying that charging people $1500 for a phone and then wondering why they're not buying any is a dumb strategy.
The extra $400 - 40% more - just makes it unaffordable.
Almost every other company has followed Apple’s move and removed the headphone jack. This really isn’t much of an issue, especially as wireless becomes more ubiquitous.
Do you actually think the average Apple consumer gives any thought into the type of screws? Really?
Also when laying on the couch your face is often squished making it not recognize you. I also like to use my devices in landscape orientation meaning that the camera used for FaceID is obstructed. Landscape orientation with TouchID put your thumb right where it needed to be to unlock the device!
With TouchID I basically never reverted to using a passcode, and now with FaceID I’d estimate it’s 20% of the time I use a passcode and another 20% of the time I have to reposition my face or my hands after it fails in order to get it to work.
The only benefit of the new mechanism for me is eliminating bezel space require for the fingerprint sensor. That’s a big benefit, but it comes with very annoying first world problems, which are especially annoying since prices for these devices have gone up so much recently.
As someone with two pairs of AirPods, the lack of a headphone jack also annoys me. Most commonly when in a car with and aux jack and no Bluetooth. Bluetooth devices also require charging one more battery. High end earbuds and IEMs also require a 3.5mm jack and IIRC it might not even be possible to do high end audio via BT due to how it works for audio(something about the audio getting recompressed).
Xiaomi Mi 8 Huawei Honor Pocophone [1] OnePlus etc.
They have amazing flagship specs and cost around 300$. I noticed that in germany many people can't imagine spending 1100Euro+ on an iPhone once they saw the cheap competition from the Chinese brands.
This will only get worser in the coming years as more people get used to Android. Young users also can't afford an Apple product in Europe and they watch the youtubers that always talk about those cheap brands. So they will grow up with android and will get used to it, which will make it very hard for apple to get them to switch. There is a noticeble change among the Youtube stars (influencers) that switched to windows machines to edit their videos. They just didn't have any comparable options in the Apple lineup. This "free" advertisement will also lead more young people to not desire Macbooks as much.
Americans should look up the market-shares of iOS internationally, it's very low. Therefore there is much less lockin (iMassage) or stigma towards using Android. Android is also getting only better over time.
Android has the best camera software and Hardware with the Pixel 3. -Best AI, Google assistant is miles ahead of Siri, Siri is an embarrassment -Best Maps -Best integration of its complete software suite of Drive, Docs, etc...
Then the is the whole textbook innovators dilemma. -Apple keeps iMassage iOS exclusive and passend on the opportunity to have the most popular communication App on the planet just in the hopes to get a few more iPhone sales. -They don't open the Siri API and stiffle integration in other home devices just to get a few more HomePod sales. -They don't allow for Spotify with its 70m paying costumers to connect to HomePod to get a few more subscriptions for Apple Music. -They don't want to build a Macbook Air 15" to not lose sales of the 15 Pro line. -They don't include a fastcharger to get a few more $on their seperate fastcharging adapter, most people that are even aware of that will buy a second market adapter anyway, and the people that are not aware of the existance of fastcharging for iPhones are just blow away when they see an 300$ Android being charged with 18w -They refuse to admit the big mistake their ultra thin keyboard was/is in their macbook lineup. I heard from multiple people already that had the money to spend 4000$+ on a new macbook pro 15 that instead held of or bought a used 2015 Macbook instead.
They are so afraid on cannibalising their own business that they stifle them to death and pass on the longterm opportunities.
To much of the world outside of US, iPhone no longer offers the comparable value that lives up to its price tag. Not even being a status symbol could save it.
Time to wake up. Slashing the price with more competitive medium tier devices, or being phased out, pick one.
If Apple bumps the storage on the base model to 128gb and drops the price by a hundred bucks, I’ll pick up this years phone on launch day. But I don’t see that happening.
For people who always want the latest and greatest: https://www.apple.com/shop/iphone/iphone-upgrade-program
Now it's Apple itself who are forcing me to switch because for whatever reason they decided that nobody needs 4" phones anymore, instead, everybody is supposed to use massive devices which are defacto phablets.
If there was a new 4" option from Apple, I would have gotten a new iPhone this year, but due to a lack of those, I'll instead either be forced to get a new SE as a future replacement, while they are still available, or switch to Android for good where plenty of smaller form factor options exist.
That's business Apple lost based on their own shortsighted decisions, nobody to blame except for themselves. At this point, it feels a little bit like the "Apple just making iPhone bigger" meme, back from the first iPad release, has actually become reality. [0]
[0] http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/iboard-im...