verroq

>Always remember that "free speech" is 100% about the right to say what you want and not be prosecuted for it

No I don’t remember. You can have “free speech” except the social consequences are that your neighbours lynch you in the streets. No I don’t recall it like that. Free speech has always been absolute because the majority opinion is immune from social consequences. It is the minority opinion that requires protection.

Those are?

When it come to security (and literally everything else), don't even both with with the "trust" part and skip directly to "verify".

This is similar to the usage of 被 in Chinese slang. E.g. 自杀 (suicide) turns into 被自杀 (was suicided, with the implication of foul play). 失踪 (disappearance) -> 被失踪 (was disappeared).

Yes this is true. Being a party member is just passing a test and paying the membership fee.

It’s not a motivator at all and your argument is invalid. Secondly, hiding things on your own screen is not censorship, hiding things on someone else’s screen is.

A key property of cryptography is that a good entropy source XOR'd with a poor (biased) entropy source does not degrade the quality of the final result.

I block ads to not be tracked, subjected to malware and unwanted annoyances. I do not block ads to censor speech.

Ah but it didn’t used to be like this.

Oh yes displaying the confederate flag which is protected speech, is comparable to death threats now? Yes Twitch isn’t a government agency, they can censor speech however they like, much like Reddit.

Perhaps we are too used to take free speech on private walled gardens for granted. These sites used to pretend to be proponents of free speech, but now that veil is being lifted and we see what they truely are. Is one not allowed to complain about this transformation? To the casual observer, these sites set the impression that they are a public forum yet they enforce their policies with a strict partisan bias. That is the crux of the issue.

Youtube’s owners didn’t upload copyrighted content to their own site with fansubs. It was all in: go legit or die in a lawsuit.

Don’t you realise the entire point of leaving is because we can’t cohabitat here?

Zoomers find it relatable since it’s another facebook/instagram/twitter feed.

They can take the case pro-bono.

What’s wrong with hiring a lawyer to assert your rights?

Online environment that allows arbitrary code execution allows arbitrary code execution.

So who will have access to this? DeepMind never publishes their models.

That’s not how it works. That’s also not how science works. The burden of the proof is on whoever is making the claim. Saying “this unsubstantiated claim is true until proven wrong” is a logically fallacy.

Just don’t hold your breath for Cryptography 2

Why do you have to:

1. Incorrectly quote the statistic (two thirds of suicides are male)

2. Come up with a BS narrative (domestic abuse, when japan isn’t even locked down) to explain these statistics after the fact (instead of a falsifiable hypothesis that can be tested)

Funnily enough, this is exactly what is wrong with social science in general.

Maybe we’re just not the target audience for reddit anymore. I’ve spoken to spoken to zoomers who use reddit and their response is that the “new UI” is all they’ve used and they like it because everything is embedded in the same page and scrolls like their twitter/facebook/instagram feed.

The only thing preventing me from adopting zfs is that it is not being part of the linux kernel.

I think what he meant was that people will dig thru your history to find stuff that (they find) is no longer socially acceptable and cancel you.

No country has any “legitimate” claims to any land either.

Related: Propellor Boss Cap Fins https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a8PjWSeLUzY

SV gets the blame because they control the platforms (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) and have no problem with doing whatever they want to further their agendas.

I doubt they’d implement PCIe since they don’t need that for their baked in GPU to talk to their baked in CPU.

Survivorship bias

Punitive damages is a thing.

Any reason why youtube-dl hasn't filed a counter-takedown notice?