1,421 karma · joined March 31, 2008
I'm one of the two people at Focused Apps. We make Emoji Me and Hit Tennis for iOS.
I personally find that sometimes I have trouble spotting the "oh! I forgot to make it DELETE instead of GET" bugs. When the parameters of the API are all in the url and/or query, it feels better encapsulated.
(promise I'm not flaming, and I fully expect to get told, yes it matters, and here's why! ;)
You can...get encouragement from them in hard times.
I'm wondering if the first ever interferes with the second? E.g., if you worked hard on something and they tell you it's not good.
If it's true that in (1), they have to offer an IAP-way for users to purchase a subscription, what does that say about (2)? The third-party developer has no way of adding IAP to their app (it's not their company and the API doesn't expose such functionality).
Under these (more and more crazy sounding) rules, is (2) still required to pay the 30%? And given that it's impossible for (2) to have an IAP subscription option, maybe (2) isn't even allowed to exist? But if it is, then the service company could just pay 3rd-party developers to write apps for their service to add value for their subscribers without having to deal with the 30% stuff.
http://venturebeat.com/2010/09/09/apple-loses-game-of-chicke...
Seems you can't guarantee that the person doesn't sell a card to cardpool and then go out and spend the money quickly. Unless you can maybe contact that company and request a re-issue with a different number? Or you just trust that the seller is honest and in the rare (?) case they screw you you don't do business with them and just eat the loss. Or something I'm not thinking of...
[Conducting relationships on Facebook is] like trying to compose a story out of the messages written on greeting cards.
Insightful. Hilarious. Wow.
It got me thinking though a cool query would be "flights from SFO to (some set of cities) in (some rather large time range) with an unusually low price".
The video says that if you send an email for future delivery, you don't have to actually be logged in at that time for it to send. How does this work? Do they log into your gmail account from their servers?
Not saying that's what I think, but that's my interpretation of the comment.
"Groups we rejected will go on to create successful startups. If you do, we'd appreciate it if you'd send us an email telling us about it; we want to learn from our mistakes."
So they are also apparently are interested in hearing about such things too.
Now that said, would this actually be useful to me? For the stuff I care about (like, say, a computer) I definitely would not use this site. So it's for stuff I don't care about. Like a kettle. But I'm fine just buying a cheap-ass old school kettle that you don't plug in. So it's probably ultimately not for me. Super clever though!