I suspect it might be more water efficient and energy efficient to do this instead of repeatedly heating up water, which takes 30s or so and wastes a lot of cold water / hot water that gets left to cool down in the pipes.
158 karma · joined February 24, 2016
I suspect it might be more water efficient and energy efficient to do this instead of repeatedly heating up water, which takes 30s or so and wastes a lot of cold water / hot water that gets left to cool down in the pipes.
You need to use a process pool in Python, thread pools are for I/O bound tasks and cannot use more than 1 core.
EDIT: I should mentioned that we are using AWS CDK for all of this. All it does is register a new task as the default task for a service and ECS/ALB does the rest.
Having a clearly defined schema that can be shared between teams (we had a specific repo for all protobuf definitions with enforced pull requests) significantly reduces the amount of headaches down the road.
This sounds like a huge advertisment but I simply thoroughly enjoyed using meteor. If it fits your use case I'd say go for it. You can build the frontend in react and re-use it should you decide to move away from meteor. The amount of backend code you need to write to make all the realtime stuff work is significantly less than with other frameworks, so not much in terms of sunk cost there.