19 karma · joined May 10, 2013
There are a lot of incubators out there. For startup founders I suggest you do your homework.
If it's a competitor to Jelly, show us how it is better.
If it isn't a competitor to Jelly, show us how it is different.
Visually it looks very similar to Jelly, tell us why it's intended to look so similar.
Lots of questions. Perhaps this was the point of the whole page.
I would love to see a bit more of the hard data behind the rankings. For example, I just tested a blog article I wrote 5 minutes ago against an article written by a proper journo on PandoDaily and I scored higher. Does that make me a better writer? I hope not.
In all seriousness, the idea has a lot of potential and you could certainly find a few nice ways to compare yourself different writing styles of famous authors Hemingway or someone else.
I really like 53's Paper app, but I wouldn't like it any less if it were called Doodlepad, DrawPaper etc.
Lesson to self, avoid generic names.
I spent the last 3 years working in Shoreditch and most of the startup founders I came across were either bootstrapping to the extreme (spending nothing but sweat capital on their project) or freelancing at least 2-3 days a week to cover costs. I think in practice this makes a lot of the work look more amateurish in comparison to seed/angel funded teams in the US. In practice, you would see a technically very talented founder without the right UI/design, a visually polished MVP with no user traction, a businessy founder outsourcing technical work to East Asia etc.
I checked out the app and it looks really sweet. I don't quite know how I would use this, as I rarely write long articles on mobile, but good job!
I didn't know I had Quip on any of my devices.
Also: Available in 11 languages on 8,560 distinct mobile devices, Quip can now be used by 1.3 billion people on mobile devices, and over 2 billion people on PCs.
Last time I checked there were only about 1.5 billion PCs in the World.
I do like the website, but I'd be a bit spooked by the big numbers.
Sounds like a Japanese girl band...
My point is that I would prefer objective reviews, not glowing praise from fans etc. The key question for is not what tech did they pack in a small screen device, but does it actually feel better to use than the incumbents.
I lost interest when they said things like "there is one hardware feature that is unique to Jolla: The Other Half [...] a concept of user-changeable smart back cover."
Surely replaceable plastic covers have been around for decades and they are mostly associated with low-end feature phones... or really old Nokias.
The way I see it Twitter is either a broadcast channel for people who want to share lots of self-important things or a stalking channel where people can follow celebrities etc. Eithe way I don't see people buying stuff unless it is celebrity endorsed.
Last one I paid for was Office 08 for Mac and it was quite buggy.
I'll reconsider office 1.) when it is free 2.) when it works seamlessly on a Mac.
1 guys "hobby" vs. 60,000 Microsofties.