Microsoft Brings Real-Time Collaboration To Free Office Web Apps
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
EDIT: A guy in this thread told it works only for IE, then this statement was fixed in "also works on Chrome". Since I'm a GNU/Linux user I could not verify myself.
I'm sure that's unrelated :-)
I'm pretty sure there's a version of Chrome for Linux.
https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/?platform=linu...
It even comes with apt repos for simple Debian-style updates.
The online Office suite has much less functionality compared to desktop versions.
The most loyal Office users are not the people who write 2 page long documents. For example think of a bank who has completely customized Excel so it displays real-time market data. Now that's where you _need_ the full suite.
Office 365 does not compete at all against Google docs.
1 guys "hobby" vs. 60,000 Microsofties.
I'll reconsider office 1.) when it is free 2.) when it works seamlessly on a Mac.
So, for the past year or two? https://office.microsoft.com/en-us/myoffice.aspx
The free online Office apps work great in Chrome on both Windows and Mac (not sure about Linux).
Last one I paid for was Office 08 for Mac and it was quite buggy.
Your right, and don't get me started on Google staring a search engine 4 years after Lycos and Go.com. I mean what's the point.
What am I missing?
Even though I think your trolling I'll bite and give you an honest answer.
There are a few reasons:
1) Google Docs isn't that good. 2) clients want a desktop office suite with the option for a web based office suite to do light work when not at their main machine. 3) people who use the online apps are a click away from downloading and buying the desktop version of office 4) its training non paying customers to use office for when they need a more powerful office suite.
I flagged this submission, I hope the usual complainers understand why.
If you don't, by all means, please elaborate.
It's probably much more relevant to hackers that how important role India plays in controlling AIDS (or, for that matter, the daily BTC/Tesla/etc. posts).
Are you honestly saying that you cannot see how smart people with excellent computing could possibly do anything to help with significant problems such as HIV/AIDS or world hunger or food insecurity?
Are you really only interested in news about the latest cat-photo startup?
(I'm not dismissing those web sites. People have fun, and winning a start-up lottery gives that person money to spend on good science.)
> Roving engine of chaos and snide remarks.
That's not a good thing, especially here.
It looks like you are putting words in my mouth.
All I'm saying is that I follow a subset of news that's related to tech and startup. Which means I don't have an informed opinion on:
> how smart people with excellent computing could possibly do anything to help with significant problems such as HIV/AIDS or world hunger or food insecurity
or:
> the latest cat-photo startup
But obviously, you are entitled to your own decisions.
Interesting twist, but I disagree.
If anything, startups would be interested in disrupting, not aiding, a staid, old, established player's contraptions.
A startup needs infrastructure apart from their product.
Perhaps you could explain why you think this is flag-worthy? I could understand that you might find it unimportant, or dull. But you've flagged it, and declared that you flagged it, which suggests you have some strongly negative feeling toward it appearing here.
I'd be interested to see where you'd put this on a scale with all the other stories that get subbed to HN.
This isn't about feelings, I'm just adding a data point to HN ranking algorithm.
The reason I enjoy being on HN is because of this community's mindset of "let's disrupt the big, established, old players". Seen from that angle, this submission is irrelevant because it's not about disrupting a big player, it's about perpetuating a harmful monopoly.
Oh and you actually do submit stuff about Microsoft, but they are all Anti-Microsoft posts. (do elaborate how THAT equates to startup-relevant)
As much as we hate shills who just blatantly support brands for no good reason, we also hate people who blatantly hate companies for no good reasons. HN is a place for reasonable debate. If you think Some big player did something right, you praise them. If you think they made a mistake, you point it out and discuss why it is a bad move on their part. But why the pure hatred?
I'm impressed.
You really took the time to perform an in-depth study of my submission/comment history, even figured out the 80% stat.
Slightly creepy but well-researched, kudos.