Looking at that partyful website vs. the author's app, an immediate analogy struck me as Discord vs. Microsoft Teams. (doge
So what is it? Colors? Animations? Gamification? Memes? "Crossing the line"?
461 karma · joined January 4, 2012
So what is it? Colors? Animations? Gamification? Memes? "Crossing the line"?
But no, thank you. That's not the place/mindset I'd like to live in.
Good luck, and stay safe.
----------------------------
Edit.
Just think of it.
Say Bob is a programmer so addicted to coding. He code and code, day and night, ignored necessary exercises, skipping meals, drinking too much soda. And then omicron hit and he didn't make it.
"He deserves it" you say? Why should not him get another chance to pull out of the rushing sessions and get better at taking care of himself?
(Looking at thousands of deaths per day in the US alone)
`This is fine.jpg`
You practice your favourite instrument and post it on the tube. Worth it.
You get to know people with similar style and taste so you jam together. Worth it.
You guys stream the sessions on Twitch and got fans. Release EPs on bandcamp. But it starts to take too much personal time away from you. Worth it?
But the fans want it! You'll have to decide. Sometimes you work for months on an album. People cheer on the live stream, but not a lot of income from selling the art. Worth it?
Pick your RUNLEVEL. :)
- It's well dressed instead of naked
- It walks on two feet
- It speaks English
... And vice versa.
Currently there are more than 919.14 million CPC members in China (data point circa 2019), and this does not include the people working for 事业单位 (gov. funded public institutes). So for a random Chinese citizen, Western people have a, like, 3% chance of hate and 97% of love? If we propagate one hop further to the relatives/friends (let's say it knows 100 people in his/her life), the number goes to 4% of love and 96% of hate.
:-(
It's like a high priority, non-maskable interrupt -- when such conditions are met (China signal pulled up to 3.3v), it is immediately no longer about the matter at hand, but the thought experiments, hypothetical stuff.
This is not good in a few ways, but I don't think you care about most of them.
But at least, I think, this will matter: If this is necessary and inevitable, then you, as a whole community, will have more difficulty, less efficiency in thinking about, or discussing anything about China.
Take an example -- if we could agree on that -- it is well known that police will kill bad people when the bad people are doing really bad things -- with the precondition that the bad people must be alive to do really bad things, and to be killed. With the same faulty deduction rules, one could say that it is well known that police kill people whenever people are alive.
Sorry if that caused confusion.
> sit down and exchange information
For one.
I am a Chinese citizen. I know many people, including close friends, relatives, studying abroad. I am not aware of any cases that their relatives are held hostage by the government. I am aware that police go after bad people (of course, the definition of "bad people" may vary nation-wise, but please take a little break on that and assume it normal), even if the bad people are relative to one entity studying abroad.
For two, about Cixin Liu's case.
This is the part I genuinely don't understand -- why would he seek asylum outside China? Did he do anything illegal? This whole thread is about an English version of the postscript in his work. I have read both native and translated version, and can confirm that the same postscript is attached in both versions, and the translation is quite precise. And then people start to discuss about "seeking for help abroad", "HK protest" etc. -- do these people think the postscript is so offensive that the government will go after him?
I don't think the text is offensive by any means. I don't think the government will go after him.
If that's not the case, what are they talking about? Am I missing something?
This kind of logic misusage is strangely common in affairs towards China but I'm not too surprised.
I still recommend just sit down, exchange information, and think.
F# has been in this position: a smaller team that tries to align with C#, without a language implementation team backing them (unlike Roslyn-C#), yet constantly feeding innovations back into the dotnet ecosystem. You can see a lot of example where F# piloted the idea, and later C# adopted and extended it in its own way, and F# struggling to catch up in that OO-centric world
(Disclaimer: MS employee, but not on the language teams)
If you're interested in the lowlevel WDDM driver <-> VM driver mapping, seek to 1:18:01 -- it also talks about the compute APIs like CUDA and OpenCL.
If you're interested in WSLG, seek to 2:13:01 -- this is the GUI part of the story.
..And
> like the Ikea line taken to a very far extreme
Looking up the specs, 1x2.2W vs. 2x38W.
Wondering how they designed the structure so that the speakers don't blow up the unit into pieces.
Maybe we need some kind of page mark and index system?
And now we just need a cable with USB on one end and USB on the other end ;)
Even pre-amped mics have a USB port.
There are also instruments that go digital -- Line6 Variax guitars/basses have an RJ45 socket beside the century-old audio jack -- you plug it into the stomp box with an ethernet cable, and then USB to computer, and you can start recording without worrying about the impedance mismatch.
And actually I think RJ45 makes more sense than USB in this scenario because the jack is locked in the port so you don't worry about accidental disconnection that would damage the PAs..
I believe there are many Chinese people, visiting HN everyday to discover and share cool stuff, and look forward to conversations that are intellectually beneficial to the participants. If anything, I hope I'm one of these good people, not a troll.
When the situation started to get tight, the meaning of word "we" here is shifting to "we Americans", but you see, unless HN put up a rule to block Chinese users, they will be here. Still looking for fun stuff, but end up seeing the theme turning to "tension", "conflict".
They think differently. Some views may seem unfair, or don't make sense to them. They usually just keep quiet, hide the entries and move on. But sometimes it gets too annoying, so they'll also raise a few points.
It is you who thinks defending China is not ok. So in converse, there will be people who think it is.
It doesn't make one troll because she's not speaking in your favor. I thought this was all fine? Can we just, sit down and compute?
Nope. Ranges are anything enumerable (can run an iterator through it by calling begin()/end() to get the boundaries), so you can do lists, arrays, generators etc.
https://www.oshwa.org/a-resolution-to-redefine-spi-signal-na...
ng1: indeed, so what? ng2: huh? ng3: what? ng4: yeah, yes. ng~: nooo.