China markets in turmoil as Russia ties add to list of risks
bloombergquint.com
bloombergquint.com
Maybe not the most useful form of reporting.. but the least useful form known to mankind? After reading the article I think there's more to the analysis than just that.
“DOW down 300 points as investors worry about Russian aggression”
Next day:
“DOW up 300 points as investors re-assess the Russian aggression”
The financial world cracks me up. Dial in any earnings call to play the headwinds, tailwinds, double-down, as we continue to, can you add color to that?, etc bingo.
Morning: DOW down 300 points because of Fed decision
Evening: DOW up 300 points because of (same) Fed decision
Context: most financial analysts at places like Bloomberg are literally some of the lowest paid employees. Most of them never traded any financial market in their entire life, which is quite short since they tend to be in their 20s.
I take the contrarian stance - these headlines are for people that are busy on Wall Street. They just need to know quickly what+context, not what+how. what+how is the holygrail and no one is stupid enough to even complain about these headlines in the Financial world. It is a tidbit that is extremely useful.
You are right about what+context, buy you don't really need analysts for that, to tell you what market moved and what economic event happened before that.
Don’t need AI, just string concatenation and an array of sentence types to randomly choose from when the article cron job starts
Used bing’s API to search for certain macro market events and used stocktwits api to see which stocks moved the most and would make headlines and aggregate articles about those
which it would post to twitter
which would drive people to the no-login no-password app and subscription service (used ids based on in-app subscription ID or something else if using a browser)
which was all populated with algorithmic trades lol
turned it off because I didn't like updating all the APIs and compute instances as the services they relied on kept changing, but yeah self advertising self operating money printer
They take market movements and append the most relevant piece of news to that movement. If you track any stock closely you'll find your daily Motleyfool article "Why is XYZ stock is moving because of [most recent relevant news for that company]"
The article is usually one paragraph stating the stock movement and a summary of the most recent news. You can get the same summary for different movements due to the automation here.
A large chunk of Chinese savings is tied to it. If they allowed people to sell or liquidate their shares, it would cause real instability.
At a more general level, I'd say it's very tough to let companies like Evergrande/Freddie Mae&Fannie Mac go down the drain because you risk the whole system going down, no matter if you're a de facto autocracy (like China) or a not so perfect democracy, like the US.
In Evergrande's case they seem to have giant projects that are earmarked as investment speculation as opposed to intended primary dwellings or immediately rentable. It is entirely possible that whole districts of buildings are never of enough utility to draw residents at any price above maintenance.
A company can go broke with either mistake but if a government knows the need for the collateral mortgaged actually exists then bounds from the macroeconomic situation apply so their shoveling of money will have an end.
If Evergrande defaults, foreign bondholders will claim their collateral.
So instead, for example, they have state-owned companies buying up Evergrande's assets, then Evergrande using that money to pay back local creditors, so that Evergrande is eventually left owning neither money nor assets to pay back foreign bondholders. Nothing left to seize in court.
Meanwhile, they are trying not to create a shock in real-estate prices that would undermine the other overleveraged developers, such as would occur if Evergrande unloaded all of their assets at once. Each developer is balancing their debt-to-asset ratio, so if their real estate assets drop in paper value, they end up in Evergrande's position.
Foreign bondholders appear to be playing along with this, which is fascinating; it suggests that either those bondholders are, too, looking to offload their hot potatoes and want to preserve the appearance that they're still worth something as they search for buyers, or else they're using those bonds as collateral for their own loans. As long as credit rating agencies play along and don't drop the credit rating to full default, they may be able to do so.
not so fast, they buy 70-year leases
(This seriously happened BTW, if you dont recall)
It's at least an order of magnitude larger of a problem for China than ties to Russia are.
For anyone unaware, nearly 2/3 of China's household wealth is tied up in real-estate assets (for the US it's < 30% of household assets in real-estate). That's a doubling over what it was a decade ago. China's socio-political stability is particularly bound to the condition of their real-estate market. A crash there would be devastating; if housing were to fall enough to revert back to that asset class being 1/3 of China's household asset base, maybe $30 trillion in national 'wealth' would have to vanish.
An additional stress on the system could make the problem exponentially worse.
Why is this an issue for China anymore than the West?
In fact, China has the majority of the world's grain stash. https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Datawatch/China-hoards-ove...
The same logical structured can be applied to not China:
"X country's biggest problem is ... food availability due to lower exports of wheat from russia and ukraine could cause an issue too."
Calories/per resident? There's many ways in which that is flawed.
https://impact.economist.com/sustainability/project/food-sec...
https://impact.economist.com/sustainability/project/food-sec...
The US ranks 9th whereas china ranks 34th. They're not going to famine or anything but food prices, or really just inflation more broadly, could be an issue. The reason china stockpiles grain is because it doesn't produce enough for itself.
China will not be able to handle the rise in fossil fuel prices and will perhaps be the country to ask Russia to stop it's invasion of Ukraine because it hurts China too much because of this.
USA wants this. It's not something that had just happened. This is a coordinated effort based on good intelligence work. Imo.
Xi Jinping is also running for election soon and is under massive internal pressure. So he has to act.
Not sure where this will leave Russia but they will be the one who lose because the pressure from the outside is to much. But sanctions will likely continue and Russia will be doomed.
This is what Xi fears, death of domestic demand.
Бесплатный сыр только в мышеловке
The US now has every excuse to coerce China, from everything ranging to Taiwan, trade issues.
In large, Putin's war with Ukraine ended up raising fossil, food prices which puts real pressure on Xi's regime.
I do not think Russia has the same level of worry as China because it has endless amount of oil and food that China does not. If China is suddenly no longer allowed to import these from other countries, it would be forced to trade with Russia under Putin's terms.
The last time we did this to a country, they launched a war instead of waiting for the inevitable internal collapse. All of this is creating an uncertain and volatile future.
TLDR: Putin's war and looming US sanctions against China will cause a volatile reaction.
The knives will come out for Putin now that everybody knows he's weak and fragile. His recent moves to punish powerful internal figures will force him to go even further. Being likely paranoid as dictators commonly are, Putin will likely do as much damage to Russia's internal functioning as sanctions do from the outside to its economy. Putin is likely to elevate the fascism to the point where their system stops functioning much at all, including their domestic economy. Purges, gulags, genocide, things typical of later stage statist regimes, it's all on the table if Putin's intention is to retain his present power. Putin only has two choices: give it up, or kill lots of people to try to fend off the sharks that will inevitably come for him and challenge his position. The considerable, fake image of strength was previously making it largely unnecessary to go as far as most dictators do to retain control, that luxury will now vanish and it'll dramatically damage Russia. People fleeing Russia are making the right choice, get out while you can.
Interestingly it was George W. Bush and an American war that provided Putin with his image foundation: high oil prices, sparked by the US debasing its dollar via outlandish spending (post 9/11 and up to the great recession crash), and the Middle East chaos including the Iraq invasion. Those high oil prices, which Putin had little to do with, made him look like a hyper competent manager of the Russia state, and he has been riding on the lifestyle improvements delivered to the Russian people from those good years ever since.
When the chickens come home to roost, they’re going to have to figure out who is going to replace the retired population, and nobody’s in a rush to immigrate to China.
China is dealing with their one child policy, they have put the cap at 3 children iirc currently, and are also making policies against things like abortion and divorce. Which may not be the correct move, but I do see more laws incentivizing children coming.
Do you have a source i can read about that? I'd be interested to know more about this.
It takes 20 years to make a 20 year old consumer while the rest of the population ages 20 years.
Seems a bit optimistic and wishy washy to say the least.
Interesting. You could be referring to several European countries, including the UK.
Also interesting: the Plague was largely responsible for the ending of serfdom, by greatly increasing the bargaining-power of peasants. I have wondered whether COVID might eventually precipitate similar tectonic social changes.
There are more people over the age of 65 in China than the total population of the UK and France combined.
Why replace anyone? The alternative is to ramp down to a lower population baseline and deal with the transition. 800M Chinese by 2100 is still plenty. Reality is right now there's 100s of million undereducated/undertrained Chinese who can't be integrated into modern economy - they're net drains. And even current system is struggling to employ millions of STEM graduates. PRC doesn't need immigration, just clamp down on top level brain drain and setup foreign worker program to take care of the aging - plenty of cheap ASEAN labour. Bonus side effect of less people = more self sufficiency and freedom to conduct assertive foreign policy. There's few upsides to maintaining and trying to increase living standards of 1.4B people with PRC resources.
The focus should be on improving the quality of life of the people, not on expanding the economy in absolute terms.
China would be better off with 1/2 the people at the same GDP (ie ~700m people at ~$24,000 per capita GDP).
Population contraction is desirable in many cases, so long as you can continue to increase productivity per capita. China has a long ways to go yet in terms of potential to raise their per capita economic output, if they're willing to pair that with a contracting population. And the lightening (from depopulation) on their resource needs is a huge help, it makes their situation so much easier.
Their productivity doesn't transform into a negative. To deal with more aged persons, they need to bolster output and taxation on that output, such that society builds a social safety net for the retired. China has room for increased taxation on various aspects of wealth and income in their nation (their wealth has ballooned massively in the last 10-20 years obviously), along with higher personal income tax rates in general.
Increasing productivity and automation frees labor to be devoted to other things that society needs. For example their farming system is very ineffecient, they have far too many people working in farming producing far too little (compare it to the US, South Korea or Japan). If you bring that up to where it should be, some of that labor becomes available to take care of the elderly, paid for via taxes. Now apply that to everything else in China that still needs modernized, made more efficient, automated.
Also automation may not play out so well for Chinese production, as it's more sensible for other nations to bring automated manufacturing onshore for a combination of reasons including reduced transport, supply chain certainty, stabler internal economics. Onshoring automated manufacturing could still use a significant amount of international remote labour, but the hosting country would capture more of the taxation from the manufacturing, which you mention as going to pay for the Chinese retirees.
Almost all want to flee/relocate Europe/US/Canada.
Turkey, Georgia, ... Come in after.
I literally saw 0 requests for China.
Also regardless of what Russian regime propoganda trying to sell we all grown on western culture and want to live in western world. People who wanted to live in Asia moved to Thailand / Vietnam / Bali long ago.
For giggles, the US should organize an unprecedented NBA post-covid celebration all-star thing with packed stadiums a week before the congress.
(Looking at thousands of deaths per day in the US alone)
`This is fine.jpg`
These “Thousands of deaths” are where the deceased happened to also test positive for COVID. Most of the deaths were people who were already very sick and likely not caused by COVID.
But no, thank you. That's not the place/mindset I'd like to live in.
Good luck, and stay safe.
----------------------------
Edit.
Just think of it.
Say Bob is a programmer so addicted to coding. He code and code, day and night, ignored necessary exercises, skipping meals, drinking too much soda. And then omicron hit and he didn't make it.
"He deserves it" you say? Why should not him get another chance to pull out of the rushing sessions and get better at taking care of himself?
- Forced vaccinations/vax passes
- Children vaccinated
- Boosters forever
- Mask mandates forever
- Social distancing forever
That's not a place/mindset I'd like to live in.
Children are vaccinated all over the world every day for multiple different diseases.
Are boosters required for ever? What's your research on this? Where did you get your time machine?
Again the use of forever, masks and social distancing become nice to have options for people but after vaccination these are guidelines rather than mandates.
Can you post the source you used for this?
https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-...
We’re now so far past thinking the cost of the pointless lockdowns was worth the benefit.
Luckily, those who used COVID to seize power now have only a few easily influenced and perpetually fearful people still willing to cede control of their lives.
Utah barely locked down, has their kids in school, no mask requirements but has also one of the lowest death rates in the country.
A lot of southern states had the same policy, but have some of the highest death rates in the country. [1]
Utah is also one of the youngest and fittest states in the country while Mississippi (#1 for deaths per capita) is consistently ranked one of the most obese[2]. As far as I'm concerned, Covid should be encouraging the US to talk about their longest lasting health crisis - an obesity epidemic, but for some reason that hasn't materialized.
1. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covi...
https://twitter.com/CDCInjury/status/1498357668125323265?s=2...
It's still early days, and there may well be a rise in deaths by suicide as we gradually come out of pandemic. We always need to be watchful.
But all the people who claim that suicide increased during pandemic are simply wrong.
They don't, they really don't, they just stopped caring about people dying
Damn, I honestly didn't expect to read about this first on HN, you are indeed right, almost everyone seems fixated on the war (for understandable reasons, I would say).
I remember posting on this forum 2+ years ago about the Chinese authorities locking down Tianjin and potentially Guangzhou/Shenzen in the South (in early February 2020, I think), I remember a HN-er from Shenzen telling me that things were just fine there. Time does fly fast.
We are seeing a huge rise in covid detected in wastewater in SV offices who have more people returning to office now that the pandemic is suddenly over.
Even more worrying is this war causing myopia. All of our attention is glued to Ukraine and we are completely discounting the risk. This is chaos.
China have not allowed a proper investigation to take place i.e by people from outside of China. China originally tried to cover up the extent of the problem so I don't trust China to investigate China.
China dropped the ball here, there is no reason they aren't in the same stage as the rest of the world, other than their own decisions. As an autocratic state they can lock down apartment blocks and just stop people moving around and people can't do anything about it. It has ended up being the reason they still need to lockdown now.
Lockdowns are a delay strategy until vaccines are available.
% of severe cases even after vax is enough to overwhelm PRC medical system, especially in less developed regions, leading to potentially millions of death considering size PRC population and gen pop lack of exposure. Covid-zero is still preferable if it can be maintained, vaccines (including mRNA) have completely failed to contain spread of omicron, which doesn't leave many options except waiting for an even less deadly variant + mass produce and distribute treatment drugs to take pressure off medical system.
I'm guessing this is omicron catching up / experimenting with dynamic-zero now that Two Sessions is over.
US grew x14 and Russia literally stayed the same.
You're claiming a country with the GDP of Italy can replace the entire west. While they are already spending 6% on military and everyone can see how that turned out...
Big LOL