As a...
– user
I want to...
– ensure the developers behind the product have robustly debated the benefits of tabs vs spaces
So that...
– I get more value from the product
Well that cuts to the quick.3,115 karma · joined October 22, 2016
As a...
– user
I want to...
– ensure the developers behind the product have robustly debated the benefits of tabs vs spaces
So that...
– I get more value from the product
Well that cuts to the quick.There's a list of current LOAs here: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/av...
And here's an example of an LOA: https://flypfc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/PFC-CAT-II-III...
We're also talking about two different things here, one being the scientific method, the other being risk analysis. Output from the former can be an input to the latter but they're otherwise orthogonal.
On the subject of risk, I don't think the drunk-driving comparison holds because the numbers are completely different. We can point to innumerable cases of drunk-driving resulting in death. But day-old pizza? I'll be surprised if you can find (just picking a number out of my hat here) even ten cases of day-old pizza killing anyone.
Oh, you sweet, innocent babe.
Praise your lucky stars for every single day that you don't have to deal with our "health care" system.
This is such a gross element of our culture—what's wrong with just living?—and I feel like it's not even really a matter of working vs. retired. I know folks who have worked the same job for decades, and they get the same harsh judgment from others as the author. But this used to be the norm! When did we switch into this thinking that we have to be constantly racking up gold stars in order for life to mean anything? Where did that idea come from?
Let's call that what it is. It ain't "passion."
That's not what OP is referring to. Go read her Twitter feed and blog.
Python, for example, has a fullmatch method.[0]
libicu's matches() function returns true "if the pattern matches the entire string, from the start through to the last character."[1]
PCRE has various flags that change what it means for a regular expression to match, including PCRE2_ANCHORED and PCRE2_ENDANCHORED. Used together, these options would require a full match with no change to the regular expression itself.[2]
0. https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html
1. https://unicode-org.github.io/icu/userguide/strings/regexp.h...
% python3
>>> import re
>>> re.search(r'R*D*M*', ' ')
<re.Match object; span=(0, 0), match=''>
>>> re.fullmatch(r'R*D*M*', ' ')
>>>McDonald is on a whole other level though. That’s not just your employer, that’s the entire space program. I hope I never have to find out whether I’m made of the same stuff he was.
No one is picking on people for having a different life. I don’t care if people want to have lawns. I care if they run a goddamn engine right outside my home every single day of the week.
You can have your lawn. I really could not care less about it. What you can’t have is my acceptance of constant engine noise in the place where I live.
- Yes, they controlled for objects appearing in the pictures that might indicate political affiliation. The images are tightly cropped around the face. See Methods.
- Yes, this is significantly better than both a coin flip and a human classifier. They gave the same test to humans, who did much worse than the model. See Abstract, Introduction, and Results.
- Yes, this is doing more than just detecting a person's race, age, and/or gender. The classifier is still accurate when they compare people with the same race, age, and gender. See Results.
If you want to discuss actual limitations in the study, here are some the author points out:
- "A more detailed picture could be obtained by exploring the links between political orientation and facial features extracted from images taken in a standardized setting while controlling for facial hair, grooming, facial expression, and head orientation."
- "Another factor affecting classification accuracy is the quality of the political orientation estimates. While the dichotomous representation used here (i.e., conservative vs. liberal) is widely used in the literature, it offers only a crude estimate of the complex interpersonal differences in ideology. Moreover, self-reported political labels suffer from the reference group effect: respondents’ tendency to assess their traits in the context of the salient comparison group."
Tom fucking Morello.
I'm tired.
Topaz: Don't know. But the Arena's mainframe for the Obedience Disks have been deactivated and the slaves have armed themselves.
Grandmaster: Ohhh! I don't like that word!
Topaz: Mainframe?
Grandmaster: No. Why would I not like "mainframe?" No, the "S" word!
Topaz: Sorry, the "prisoners with jobs" have armed themselves.
Grandmaster: Okay, that's better.
I might be misreading the grammar but it looks like you can produce the desired effect by using an attribute, e.g. the following would perform an equality check, not an assignment:
match status:
case requests.codes.not_found:
return "Not found"
The tutorial seems to confirm this: "This will work with any dotted name (like math.pi). However an unqualified name (i.e. a bare name with no dots) will be always interpreted as a capture pattern"(The other significant factor is running tests.)
Maybe I should try the Simple English pages instead. :-/
I understand that people can be aggressive, rude, and downright hostile. I'm not suggesting that such behavior be rewarded. Nor am I suggesting that every open source project has to do everything any user says. I do, however, object to the notion that there is no obligation whatsoever between the producer of a technology and the users of that technology, regardless of whether money has changed hands.
ADHD does not fall under CACI, and will trigger a deferral to the FAA. The FAA will then refer the applicant to a HIMS AME. (Human Intervention Motivation Study.) HIMS is really about substance abuse, not ADHD, but it's doing double-duty now for things like ADHD and the four conditionally approvable SSRIs. ADHD can also trigger expensive neurocognitive tests ("CogScreen"). So ADHD really is in a separate class of conditions when it comes to getting a medical certificate.
Current use of stimulants is a denial no matter what.
As a flight instructor I think this is completely bonkers. The nature of ADHD is such that if it keeps a person from being able to fly safely, that will show up during training as a failure to meet performance standards. It's completely different from something like a heart condition, where a pilot will fly just fine until suddenly their heart stops. I've taught lots of folks with ADHD diagnoses; almost all of them did great, and the few that didn't were very obviously not able to handle the airplane.
Edit: Alright, alright, forget the old computer. My new ones get it right too. All of which is a red herring, because the point is this behavior is ridiculous and never should’ve shipped.