In the article, the author goes over exactly this.
162 karma · joined November 10, 2016
They are simply not made for the conditions here.
We're not in a time in history where this is considered an acceptable solution for women, as we (species) are all about expressing individuality.
The full fix will require a complete recompile of the full kernel/toolchain, if they can do any kind of microcode update (I have not checked) that allows for mitigation.
^ This is not the case, you can trigger these from userspace in valid syscalls. The same behaviour was in spectre.
Why would you when you can just disable the kernel module, then nothing bluetooth works. Why rebuild ?
HN users is not the target audience. It is not intended to be dissected and pulled apart for analysis and profit. Sometimes things are because they were.
The only visible difference I can see, is that embargoed bug fixes will hit RHEL first before CentOS stream.
This apparently is very difficult for people to understand.
This is exactly why I have reached the conclusion that I have. The extras are not a considerable enough benefit in situations that I find myself in. Doing industrial work doesn't lead to the benefit of the extras.
It may be that those of us see this don't overvalue optional extras that have significantly less practical value than the marketing suggests.
If you really practice this in life, you're going to be taken advantage of.
You're right, discussing it is just stupid. My mistake.
> it has effectively no bearing on weight in the general population (non-athletes).
Cmon man, strength / muscle building -absolutely- has an effect on "weight" and "bodyfat". Even when not at the athlete level. Muscle at rest burns more calories than fat at rest, and those burned calories gotta come from somewhere.