944 karma · joined June 19, 2016
[1] Via https://www.wsj.com/business/media/acquired-podcast-tech-bus...
I didn't have any friends on ICQ - they were all on AIM or MSN. But I was very active on ProBoards (a non-phpBB forum service) and ICQ was the only social icon that I was missing from my mini-profile, so I signed up so I would have something to put there.
Given how vain and overly-focused I was on appearances in that context, I cannot imagine how bad my mental health would have been if social media was available for me.
My use case is just: my disk is full, I don't know why. This happens on one of my computers like once a year, so the fact that it's slow is fine. It usually helps me spot some folder set that is taking up a lot of space that I don't need on that PC, or something large that is duplicated.
My personal favorite example is wedding photos and videos. Turns out: those are huge, I am not going to delete them, but they don't need to be backed up on every computer I own.
Either this is my own ignorance, or the universe is super deep outside of the most popular content. Probably both.
The core challenge of phishing attacks is that USPS is not, in fact, the primary victim of these attacks.
The victims are distributed citizens who fall for the scam. USPS doesn't have very many levers available to them to address the attacks (besides a warning on their site, which they have), but also doesn't 'feel' the impact so would have a hard time justifying substantial investment in addressing it.
Ultimately the solution needs to come from regulatory regimes that target fraud, particularly SMS message spam.
One way to look at it is that this Byzantine process helps Anthem by trapping valid claims in a black hole of bureaucracy. That way they don't need to pay, right?
It's not quite that simple. It's true that incentives are not usually aligned, but in reality the payment P&L impact is often far away from the claims processing administrative decisions. At many payers (like Anthem), the ultimate 'payer' for most of the cost may not actually be Anthem. They may be the third-party administrator charging back to an employer, or the Federal government. Even if it is Anthem, the owner of the cost center for this broken administrative process is almost certainly removed from whomever runs the actuarial accounting to decide what kinds of services to cover and how much to charge customers (except, as the author found, once they unite at the level of the CEO).
Ultimately for Anthem, this claim cost them a lot more to handle than if they had just paid out in the first place - even if they were the ultimate payer. Consider how much time the author spent on the phone with customer service representatives. Many of those were almost certainly contracted out and charged to Anthem by the minute. Then consider the claims processing backend, also likely contracted through third-party claims processing and management systems. It would have been simpler to manage the first one straight through.
Usually what it comes down to is that it is hard to estimate the ROI for investing in fixing a problem like this, because the benefits are spread out over many small cases. One way to prove it out is to highlight some of those small cases so that payers feel the pain and recognize the need for change. Thus, I am glad the author published this complete story.
[0] https://docs.beaconstac.com/en/articles/6018654-what-is-erro...
But hard agree on the lack of privacy policy, especially since it asks for a LinkedIn.
There are two places where ads remain: 1) Social media where the ads are integrated and not blocked (Facebook, YouTube in-video promos) 2) Billboards in cities and airports
#1 has gotten more aggressive lately. I'm not a fan, but I understand why it has happened. However, at least I can choose to avoid these sites if I wish.
#2, which is what the article is about, is unavoidable for me. I find billboards ugly, distracting, and annoying clutter. It's just visual "noise." What's worse is that the products targeted in #1 above are frequently relevant to me, and I have purchased them. But I cannot think of a single time I have ever made any purchase based on any billboard. I would love if more municipalities clamped down on these.
Personal anecdote: Once I was using Google Collab to process a few thousand images. I needed to move the photos (less than one GB) to a new folder. It took over an hour, and appeared to process the moves in JavaScript in my web browser.
By the story’s own account, they were going to Jefferson who had already unsuccessfully lobbied for the metric system, and when the instruments finally did make their way to the Secretary of State they were unconvincing.
That said, I am still glad to have read the story and formed the opinion.
In this file I write the date and a short note anytime something important happens. Visit the doctor and get test results? Write a note. Change the oil in my car? Write a note. Get a quote for a mortgage? Write a note. Open a new bank account? Write a note. Shop for new running shoes and learn what size fits best? Write a note. Have a contractor come work on the house? Write a note.
If there are important files that relate to those I list filenames and say where they are, but frankly I haven’t found that to be very useful. Rarely do I need any original documents. And if I died prematurely, my family can just scroll through this document to check off accounts (Google will automatically send it to them if I don’t access it for a period of time).
I’ve been using it for a few years and found it to be a total lifesaver. I frequently just need to quickly see how I did something, who I used, or his much something cost.
I store the live version on Google Drive so I can edit it anywhere, but you could host it locally.
After reading that comment and other comments like it online, I decided that it was casting the Grainger team in a worse light than I intended to, so I removed that sentence. The people at Grainger don't like the bridge, but it's not like they are out petitioning for its destruction. Even if they were, I would understand where they were coming from. My article romanticizes the bridge a bit, but it's not a particularly nice bridge to walk over today.
I think I might have banned my site too if the same simple 10-year-old page was linked to 85 times, so I get it!
Also the reason I don't track pageviews is psychological: because the metric cannot impact me in any way, I avoid it so that I don't just sit around watching numbers go up.
I am glad you liked the inline notes! I explored a lot of ways to do that before I settled on them. s/o to Matt Stevans for the CSS: https://www.stevans.org/inline-footnotes/
I don't think the bridge needs another plaque. But the good news is that now if someone else is curious and searches the project number, they will find the answer!
Source: Am that author. :)