It’s odd that someone would assert that a legal action would be successful while citing no legal precedent.
All of the facts presented could be true, but what law is broken? What harm creates the basis for a civil suit?
944 karma · joined June 19, 2016
All of the facts presented could be true, but what law is broken? What harm creates the basis for a civil suit?
Any model that gets rid of these frees up a huge swath of capital and work from society, and can use that work elsewhere. Of course, that is easier said than done.
Even the study authors acknowledge the severe risk of the huge confounding variable.
But they can and do add systematic protections, like only buying based on the free float to avoid a short squeeze.
(Anna's Archive moves, so you won't see it by looking at the domain history in this post.)
I have a Steam Deck and love it, but the only experience I have with those pads is “dammit I accidentally touched the pad again.” If I want a mouse, I just connect a Bluetooth mouse.
I thought for sure everyone knew it was a flop and we’d never see it again, but obviously that’s not right since they are back. What am I missing?
This is true for American Airlines: https://viewfromthewing.com/new-report-says-aadvantage-is-wo...
I don't know whether "usually" is accurate though; it may be that common law prevails as you say in most transactions despite the states with regulations.
The score value starts at 1. Every additional "check" multiplies the score value by 2 (so 2, 4, 8, 16...). The first player to say "checkmate" receives the score. Track your summed score between games; the player with the highest overall score at any given time is "winning."
Thankfully there is real data if we want to know how microwaves are used. Survey below says they are used a bit more than ovens, but half as much as cooktops/stoves. Varies by cohort and meal.
Source: https://indoor.lbl.gov/publications/residential-cooking-beha...
If I am a cop in another jurisdiction and I see that in this case of error, the facial recognition company was held to account but not the police or municipality, I will be more likely to blindly trust the software assuming that they either patched it or will take responsibility.
We should demand accountability for both.
You might consider changing this to a more accurate headline, like "Air and Space domain awareness."
"Full spectrum Geospatial intelligence" most commonly refers to full color satellite photos (sometimes including near infrared).
In the Geospatial world, "spectrum" almost always takes on its literal meaning - the spectrum of light. And "Geospatial intelligence" refers to intelligence gathered from Geospatial platforms, not intelligence about the locations of those platforms.
He gambled $300K from his extra savings outside his retirement accounts, and he hedged significantly to reduce downside risk.
I think we all mostly agree that there is a single correct answer, and that is why this discussion exists in the first place.
Messages that earlier in the process would likely have been classified as "friendly hello" (scroll down) now seem to be classified as "unknown" or "social engineering."
The prompt engineering you need to do in this context is probably different than what you would need to do in another context (where the inbox isn't being hammered with phishing attempts).
It’s a weirdly specific thing to say multiple times.