364 karma · joined October 23, 2014
And although Algorand doesn't include some of the more "controversial" privacy features, it's still RTBF-compliant. [1]
[0]: https://www.algorand.com/resources/blog/role-of-transaction-...
[1]: https://www.algorand.com/resources/blog/right-to-be-forgotte...
[1]: https://www.algorand.com/resources/news/carbon_negative_anno...
[2]: https://www.algorand.com/resources/blog/silvio-micali-lex-fr...
[1]: https://www.algorand.com/resources/news/carbon_negative_anno...
The second and third strategies I don't completely relate to. If it works for you, great.
The fourth I would somewhat disagree with. You need to know where you're going before you start playing but "moving towards a perfect mental image" is just silly. Is this piano player trying to be a robot? There are countless ways to play certain pieces and a lot of the time it depends how you're feeling that day. Play like a human being. This quote by Beethoven is apt, "To play a wrong note is insignificant; to play without passion is inexcusable." I would say the most important thing is to play with passion and to try to stay true to the spirit of the piece you're playing.
Source: my personal opinions after playing classical piano for 14 years.
Ask yourself a few questions first. Does your cofounder have a track record of execution or do they bounce from scheme to scheme without achieving anything? Are they sane and competent or do they have a criminal history and a troubling social media presence?
Do your due diligence. Run a background check (seriously). Don't be afraid to ask the hard and uncomfortable questions up front.
In my own experience, if I were to bring on a cofounder again I would write a honeymoon period clause into the Founders' Agreement. Something to the effect that if the relationship doesn't work out during an initial period of time, each party's risk is limited to only the money and time they put into it. I'd rather get an annulment than a divorce if possible.
Instead there are generic shakers that could get a very similar result with some training, even though they don't have a built-in measure. All commercial kitchen supply outlets have them.
Better yet, when kitchen staff are ultimately replaced by robots (or the salt dispenser gets built in to the fry station) this won't be an issue anymore.
Also, I got the sense that they don't have a great relationship with their franchisees. For example, there's a special salt shaker called AccuSalt[0] that the McDonald's Corporation requires franchisees to own which costs hundreds of dollars if I remember correctly. It's a total ripoff because the thing is a cheap plastic POS that breaks whenever it's dropped and franchisees aren't allowed to buy a generic one. As a result of this and probably 100 other little things, I once heard that the franchisee I worked for got the McDonald's Corporation to fly out an HVAC tech across the country to fix a thermostat out of spite.
[0]: https://www.sonoco.com/productsandservices/plastics/accusalt...
> It is crucial to note that affirmatively declining to discuss the investigation in the absence of counsel is not the same thing as remaining completely silent. If you are not in custody, your total silence, especially in the face of an accusation, can very possibly be used against you as an adoptive admission under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
I thought we had the right to remain silent. Can someone explain this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_von_B%C3%BClow#Quotations