51 karma · joined January 13, 2016
This is a thoroughly modern perspective. Historically, Aristotle was considered "The Philosopher". Plato has staged a resurgence in the discourse (in fact I'm partial to Plato myself), but you're over-stating his historical impact. Which is sort of ironic, when you're discussing historical impact.
This type of contract made a killing a few months ago. Basically miners trade by sandwiching orders in the mempool. You can search the 'salmonella' contract for more info.
This is close, but I imagine it would be more akin to temporarily relocating to a different school district, then selling / moving out after the children hit college age.
Note that this type of thing does aalready happen, albeit not to the extremes you're imagining. Imagine one parent retiring early or temporarily so that total family income qualifies for certain loans or grants.
I do not think it is fair for you to call one base deluded. And I consider it highly ironic that you would use the phrase "art of obstruction" in this circumstance.
You can read more about the Department's increasing budget here: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45820.pdf
From the article:
> But about 100 million masks in the stockpile were deployed in 2009 in the fight against the H1N1 flu pandemic, and the government never bothered to replace them.
Would that not make this a bipartisan issue?
Or would it be fair for me to assume that you also think black cops are targeting white citizens for unfair arrests?