No double blind methodology protocol.
166 karma · joined May 29, 2017
No double blind methodology protocol.
IETF draft standard of IPv8: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pouwelse-trustch...
Bonus: "De-DSI" == LLM- based fuzzy search + IPv8
What IPFS, Dat protocol, Tribler, and all others are missing is "adverserial decentralised information retrieval".
For any keyword you type in, the match you want should show first. Trolling, Kremlin bots and copyright police forces should not be able to bring it down. Unsolved problem. How to create a privacy respecting relevance ranking or distributed clicklog.
Its as hard as making a decentralised Google and decentralised YouTube at the same time. Over 75 master students and PhDs put their coding efforts in it at Delft University.
Without any risks? Ideas from self-sovereign identity are somewhat included in this promo. Does this service include hiring notaries to check state-issued IDs to verify identities? Risk-free IDs are unsolved I believe.
Could the vision system not be the AI foundational model? Car vision, specifically Tesla state-of-the-art is not mentioned. I see bit of NLP bias.
Full Text PDF https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mike-Hulme/publication/...
(disclaimer: academic working on this problem for 15+ years, Tribler lab)
Last I heard, EDA tooling failed to innovate. No serious money for open source, little competition and market failure for closed tools.
See the full implementation here by Delft University of Technology scientists and students. [1] Security needs work, functionality works. (disclaimer, I'm the responsibile professor)
[1] https://github.com/Tribler/trustchain-superapp#luxury-commun...
This work presents the starting point for mathematics of trust. Disclaimer, involved in this work.
[1] https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/master/code-of-conduc...
And if it works, its also pretty cost effective.
- Is the mentioned blacklist implemented?
- Will it be enabled by default?
- Will the legal entity responsible for the blacklist be US-based?
Hard to protect systems from irrational attacks like that (we know from building a similar system). They are quite transparant about their "unsolved-problems": https://github.com/filecoin-project/specs/issues/63
"In order to comply the with law, a miner who agreed to store the bad data must not serve it, and delete the data from its hard drive as soon as possible."
> The meshsub router offers a baseline construction with good amplification control properties, which we augment with gossip about message flow.
This is notoriously hard to get right. How to prevent spam, posioning or Sybils in your gossip network? Scientific work on p2p overlays and gossip is hard to publish now at venues like Usenix or NSDI. After Newscast from 2003 it seems you need strong identity to make these systems attack resilient. An unsolved problem.
Thank you for this insight! We will put a university student team on exploring this likely vulnerability in IPFS/libp2p.