Other similar things are asteroids. It's doing a thing an asteroid would do.
It's much more likely that it's ejecta from some event from outside our solar system. Or a redirected Oort body.
517 karma · joined May 10, 2012
It's much more likely that it's ejecta from some event from outside our solar system. Or a redirected Oort body.
Verily the poorly-skilled can never write better, and the better never poorer.
But are there known 'kidnap ransomers' that could be deduced through language? It seems unlikely, I guess, unless Norway has enough local variances that would give a native speaker away through dialect.
The idea that journalists can be biased is not something the profession was somehow unaware of previously.
In the same way that scientists understand that they probably can make up data plausibly, they realize that they make their name with their credibility.
But of course society is presently at the adolescent phase of realizing you can physically say and do whatever you want...whether bad science and bad journalism are confronted by the social analog of thr prefrontal cortex is uncertain. Maybe repercussions will help (collapse of democracy and global warming being the two most likely)
Back in the day, if I typed in "Radiohead" or "guitar pedal schematics" I would find forums or personal sites about these topics.
Now I will find (1.) Stores (2.) Content aggregators
Those niche forums and websites likely still exist, but it isn't obvious how to find them.
The ones I frequent are insulated from the wider internet. The fact that these places are absorbed into the structure of Reddit is a shame: while it's easier, the discussion is constrained by what is possible on the platform. Static content is difficult to maintain, like discussions of album errata or the history of some circuit.
This is probably just bias for the late-90s.
If you don't have that, you're a little more limited to relying on visual information for everything
Then just slide the Club off
Article: "...they told the venue they sold 150 tickets (a sell out) and only one person actually showed up who bought a ticket."
Even if they pay the band only after the show, the venue might get $16 for several hours of staffed operation.
People attending a show buy tickets, food, and drinks from the venue.
So, the band's payment is typically easily recouped because the venue expects a minimum guaranteed income (say 40% capacity, average of $6/attendee spent on incidentals).
If zero people show up, they have the expense without the income, having sacrificed the night that could have gone to a more popular band, while also paying workers and incurring utility expenses.
As a non-pot user, Spice seems to lack the 'fun' of marijuana- the herbology, aesthetics, and equipment.
Very few people enjoy beer or whisky and decide they will start drinking isopropanol or Everclear to satisfy their interest. They dive deeper, going for IPAs and single malts and tend to be pretty single-minded about their preference.
It's a strange argument, and goes back to the question of how Spice/legalization correlate.
People mostly do research chemicals as a stand-in for their drug of interest. I sincerely doubt legalization would cause "considerably more" than prohibition, and I'd like to see any evidence that it does.
This is the 'gateway drug' canard repackaged.
When you remove and important and often sole provider of family planning, the planning part goes astray.
My biggest question is who profits from eliminating places like that? I don't buy that it's just about abortion and religion (and therefore politics, in the US.)
Twitch just needs to display video and a button that autoprints the Donger.
If you spend time working in a lab with grad students, listen to them. Heed their points about the field and their boss.
Research is research, and maybe you'll have some idea of what the technical details of the field are. But the only way you know what your life will be like is to pay attention. It's not bad, but you're trading something real to have "Dr." on your magazine subscriptions.
My biggest concern is more people getting PhDs, and the process becoming the New Bachelor degree, particularly in STEM.
Between classes, teaching, and genuinely getting things done, it's not a fast experience.
Also, you probably arent making a ton more unless you go for an industry job...which is a little bit the opposite of the Platonic independence supposedly at the heart of the training method.
But very few people I know want to be a PI.
If we cancelled out that movement (relative to the Milky Way), does the mass change?
Is how much do the various relative movements affect our mass, and would it be possible to pull tem apart? (Solar System, Relative to galactic center, other galaxies, etc)
I'm no physicist, just a chemist. What are they?
Before they outlined what they were looking for. Now they're just sifting.
Most science doesn't allow you to propose "We will expose A to X and see what happens", but rather expects a hypothesis: "We expect Z following X>A because of [rationale]."
I would love to spend hours clicking around on the twenty-years-past internet of my youth.
I particularly miss an old game called Vagabonds Quest; essentially just a perl chatroom with basic DnD classes/leveling built in for competition.
Iraq/Afghanistan have been much longer than Vietnam for a very obvious reason.
Am I misunderstanding something?
If you pay attention to shelves, almond and soy milk are gaining in popularity. The dairy industry is attempting to slow the momentum of an extant product class.
You'd have to use something like neutrons, which don't interact with electrons and can be used to image internal structure. Those tend to have side-effects, though, like inducing radioactive decay in nuclei.
I doubt any restaurant would list a veggie burger as "Burger". There'd be a "V" or something, to explain why it was $2 extra.