The physical ones have indices, and the digital ones usually do as well (plus string search).
870 karma · joined September 24, 2020
The physical ones have indices, and the digital ones usually do as well (plus string search).
Even then, Rh disease usually only causes symptoms in the baby in subsequent pregnancies with the same bloodtype incompatibilities, when the antibodies already exist in the mother.
I'm not sure what exactly it means that Neanderthal women's uterus wouldn't be able to host HS babies, but that sounds different to me.
Unless you know more about this Neanderthal uterine incompatibility.
Still humans.
HS are sometimes called "modern humans" to differentiate.
I read big claims, no evidence.
"AI code is non-deterministic and has risk. But human code is non-deterministic too, and it has the exact same risk."
No, that's not true. LLM-written code has very different risks, like completely misunderstanding the requirements, adding in hallucinated features, and losing sight of what the codebase actually does (massive tech debt).
I should ask, who writes the unit tests? And how do you write the unit tests beforehand? What if you need to prototype in order to figure out the shape of the API? The setup used here is so far removed from any software safety or software quality concerns, it would be hilarious if it weren't sad.
Stop posting marketing content void of any real information, please.
von Neumann deserves credit for many things, but not this.
He famously brought a lawyer with him to a meeting after they wanted to discuss the report and the rights of their invention. The whole ENIAC saga has made me reconsider von Neumann as a person. He was a talented mathematician, sure, but he seems to have also been a greedy scumbag.
Eckert and Mauchley did not try to conceal their inspiration from Atanasoff, although I believe there was a court case on this topic.
And it is completely ridiculous to claim that von Neumann would have been able to describe the computer better than its inventors.
It's eaually ridiculous to consider that they would not have published themselves. They were collaborating with von Neumann on the report after all.
Goldstine and von Neumann stole the credit from Eckert and Mauchley, that is documented history.
Oh, and they are using consumers prompts to gather even more data. LLMs are creating even greater asymmetric information situations than we had before.
Also, the common person has no say in how these systems are developed, the big actors do, and these systems are already used to automate decisions. That's a totalitarian potential, not just authoritarian.
You still didn't answer.
Technology and capitalism are not natural phenomena, they are political ones.
You are conveniently ignoring the comparison to cancer. Capitalism and cancer both demand growth at the cost of everything else. This is what leads to them destroying the systems they inhabit.
Shareholder capitalism explicitly ignores natural constraints in order to chase a constant rate of growth. That's what cancer does, it eats up resources from other cells in the organism in order to do nothing but grow, killing the organism in the process.
The purpose was to underline that catering to the far-right and providing them with a space try out messaging is not a very hidden aspect of X.
I didn't mean to imply that you don't think in general.
Media does report on far-right output on twitter sometimes, but not often. And when they do, it often boosts the message instead.
It's the same mechanism as how Donald Trump originally got elected.
...and at the same time, they are focus-testing extremist messaging.
Elon Musk is using twitter to create a global far-right platform that right-wing politicians can use to experiment with talking points before watering them down and bringing them to the public.
The story is that Adi was less of a hardliner, but still a card-carrying member of the nazi party.
The Epstein stuff is extremely disappointing of course, but his analysis is still quite sober and valid.
Israel invades Lebanon due to risk of Hezbollah attacks
rather than:
Israel says "risk of Hezbollah attacks" reason for invasion