This blog post was very painful to read without suffering second hand embarrassment.
199 karma · joined January 24, 2018
This blog post was very painful to read without suffering second hand embarrassment.
You: probably due to their past privilege
What wavelength offers:
- Privacy focused (majority of users do not care about this, all modern chat apps have e2ee already)
- Natively runs on Apple devices (without Android/Windows version, good luck getting a large user base, especially with 2 developers)
- An AI chatbot (discord/slack already have this?)
- A groups -> threads -> messages layout. Like they mentioned, the same as slack but less corporate. Seems like a good idea since Slack is pretty awful for personal use.
The article could've done less without the author patting themselves on the back about how amazing their opinions offered were.
Then say: The only competitive advantage that OpenAI has here is a headstart of 6-12 months
It's almost as if they want to keep this advantage, huh? Blows my mind how business illiterate some HN commenters are.
Google missed the boat and focused on the completely wrong things and yet Android is at 70%+ phone OS market share.
No phone consumer would care whether the developers of their apps had AI as part of their development toolkit.
"Dear CTO, let me leech onto this unrelated topic to ask you to completely remove ways you gather data (even though it's the core way you create any of your products)."
Some people man..
Maybe you should brush up on your own English skills?
Got a source for that? Sounds like you expanded that personal anecdote a bit too much.
The one example you provided proves the opposite of what you wanted lol