This [1] is an old video about how Excel is used professionally. If that's not possible then the website is not good enough.
120 karma · joined October 8, 2022
This [1] is an old video about how Excel is used professionally. If that's not possible then the website is not good enough.
I would love to have a system where my notes are automatically linked with notes from other users who have the same ideas or goals.
For sure there is a 'living on one dollar a day' community that is willing to receive a UBI. That would be $400 per year. With a $4000 pledge per year, it takes 1000 people to finance a 10000 community. Add some technology transfer, and if UBI works, then the community should be able to finance its UBI by themselves after some years.
You still need at least a locally running spreadsheet application for the Excel wizards. If I were Google or Slack, I would push Libreoffice Calc to be better than Excel. Only then will big companies be able to use an MS Office alternative.
Income tax can be seen as a tax on companies that can't be embezzled. Most people are honest and want to see their full income on documents so a company has to pay the full amount of the taxes.
This leaves the lower and middle classes with less money, but it also forces the market to offer the goods for less.
The alternative would be taxing the companies directly. People would earn more, but companies would also request more for their goods because they have to pay more taxes. But would the tax payout be the same if companies have an even bigger incentive to hide their profits?
The core of Facebook is the idea of reinventing Myspace as a business app with a formal design. From that point of view, it makes sense to let Microsoft reinvent the 3d user experience.
I doubt that it will create the package that will establish 3d headsets. For a workplace, it's a feature that the colleagues in a meeting are at a distance. On the other hand, we would already know if a virtual desktop with a huge spreadsheet would be more efficient than a monitor.
Without a Steve Jobs, users have to figure out the purpose of 3d headsets by themselves. Meta should follow the model of the PC and let every producer of electronics build a compatible product. Let everybody use the patents as long as they build a headset that fulfills the spec.
They should also avoid any lock-in and choose a free operating system. Only then can it be used by enthusiasts to experiment until the purpose of 3d headsets is found.
This can still be beneficial for Meta because they can establish themselves as the leading market place for 3d apps. Furthermore, like ads on the web, there is a need for an ad network because all the free apps need to be financed. Meta can ride the network effect of being the first mover.
Meta has the chance to create the next platform. I doubt that they will take the risk. By locking it down, they can be sure that they will never lose whatever they create. Unfortunately, they are only on a way to create the precursor to the 3d ipad.
But is it bleak? When we go all in on virtuality, and the resolution is high enough and all senses are covered, what would be missed from the physical world?
I don't understand how the shitting, and slapping right back is economically relevant. How is it preventing a country or a region from picking a market and becoming a global leader and thus earning high margins? E.g. people have been dissing China's product quality for ages and yet that hasn't prevented China from improving.
As a side note, it shouldn't be an economic disadvantage that Germany exports 30% to the European periphery. Cars are a competitive market with French, Korean, Japanese and American offers. The periphery should be able to make back much more if they specialize in products of a high-margin market. E.g. if I were a politician, I would go all-in on medical research and try to develop some world-leading equipment or cures.
>President François Mitterrand argued for the single currency because he hoped to bolster French influence in an EU that would otherwise fall under the sway of a unified Germany
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/11/17/the-time-bomb-a...
Which cultural problems exists that keeps the periphery poor? I would like to argue that the cultures of the periphery are what will attract people and customers and what will allow the periphery to develop.
That's true if you assume a constant rate of incidents. But when engineers are responsible for customer issues, they become aware of problems and can change the product to reduce those incidents.
In services like this one, letting engineers do the customer support is the closest they can get to eating their own dog food.
If incidents are handled by another department then it's more rewarding to implement another bonus-relevant goal than to reduce the number of problems.
It could be as easy as creating a Mastodon instance to find out.