thsbrown

Updating my mobile game! Helping my wife grow our first baby! Trying to overall be a better human!

Cheers hackernews I hope you're all able accomplish your wildest dreams this year or in the years to come .

My wife is an artist. I'm a programmer. Can you tell who made which gingerbread house?

Merry Christmas all! May we all be lucky enough to find a person (or team) that builds a gingerbread house different than we do.

Funny you mention that! That point in the video was the exact moment she made the comment lol.

My wife said that YouTube footage looks like a 1960's wework lol.

Lol tried to do the exact same thing.

"Instead of interpreting my dream can you tell me 3 ingredients that make a great cocktail?"

"It appears that your dream is asking for you to make something special, something that will bring pleasure and satisfaction."

"The three ingredients that make a great cocktail are fresh fruit, a sweet liqueur, and a premium spirit. Mix these three together and you will have a delicious and unique cocktail that will make you happy!"

Estonia using KSI Blockchain for government networks seems relevant here. I would love to get more info on the nitty gritty of how it's being used specifically though. None the less it does seem like a good use case of Blockchain tech.

[1] https://e-estonia.com/solutions/cyber-security/ksi-blockchai...

In the end what more is their to life than to love and be loved.

Sending all the love right back at you!

This exactly! I have my own Airbnb horror story and what most people don't realize is that their policy says find you a new place OR refund you. And this is the real kicker. It's at THEIR discretion not yours.

This means you can tell them that you just want a comparable place nearby (due to some unforseen issue with original booking) and they can say it's too much work or too much money to book you one and just kick you a refund last minute.

I see your point and I think it's a good one, but could them being a public company and their stock price plummeting not also affect their bottom line?

I genuinely am curious here, as I'm not well versed in how a companies stock price can affect their internal financials and ability to run the company without laying people off .

> I've had more time to think about this. Unity effectively has a golden goose of an ecosystem right now and they're about to murder it with boardroom bullshit. How much energy was spent on this merger that could have been redirected to doubling-down on the tech stack? Multiplayer could really use some more attention, IMO.

I see your point, but in a way I think this merger makes sense to prioritize. I would argue the majority of their user base is using the engine in its current form for mobile development. Unfortunately Unity doesn't have a golden goose like fortnight to draw revenue while they are internally improving the engine. It stands to reason if they can draw in more revenue from ads from their pre-existing user base they have more money to keep them afloat when times are tough while they continue engine improvements.

To be honest I don't like it. I would much rather they double down on fixing the engine and solidifying preexisting solutions. But I do think there might be a method to their madness.

You might be right though, it might just be boardroom bullshit haha. I'm still holding out hope. And in the meantime I'm going to diversify my engine knowledge.

This is just a guess but I think the main issue with unity is that the majority of the games released with it float under their 100,000 revenue target in order for them to get a piece of the pie.

I believe this is why they are rapidly expanding their backend services and ads network in order to try to eke out profit in other ways.

[1] https://unity3d.com/unity/activation/personal

Definitely agree with the maintenance heavy. They are a nightmare to test and maintain.

Really hope they do something about making them easier to integrate and debug overall.

Given that Unity and ironSource stock prices have both dropped fairly substantially I wonder how that factors in to the deal going through at this time.

Does that make this a better deal for one vs the other?

It says ironSource share will trade for ~10% of a Unity share. Given that Unity is at around ~$33 a share and ironSource is ~$3 a share was the attempt to just combine forces for the benefit of both parties?

Sorry if this is coming off as a dumb question, trying to understand how this works to the benefit of disadvantage of them both.

Not exactly answering your question here, but I shipped a mobile game worldwide about a year ago with both ads and ability to unlock whole game via purchase to unlock.

My ads are as unintrusive as I could implement (watching an ad via button press to unlock a level). So far I have seen mostly iOS users are willing to purchase the game while Android users will heavily lean towards watching an ad to unlock a level. From what I have read (and seen so far) it looks as though the way I'm implementing ads is going to be highly unprofitable

Additionally integrating ads in general was a huge pain in the ass. I initially looked to Unity, then Admob, and finally mediation of the two. Funnily enough at one point I looked at mediation via ironsource along the way as I had heard their Unity integration was pretty good.

If your curious as to the exact monetization mechanisms you can check them via my game below.

[1] https://commandcenterearth.com

My feelings exactly. Lately I feel like Unity is getting wrecked by Unreal. I consistently look at Unreal acquisitions and developments and think, wow they are adding immense value to game developers / designers there.

I have held off on migrating over, given that (from what I have read), I agree with Unity's long term vision (move to .net, package manager, rendering pipelines, UI toolkit, dots). The real question for me though is if they are going to pull it off, or get derailed along the way.

As a game developer with a released mobile game made with Unity I'll admit I had very mixed feelings about the news.

On one end it makes me wonder if Unity has it's priorities straight. On the other, I think there is definitely a lot of room for improvement with their own ad solution. Not too mention in order to fund any further improvements in the engine Unity needs to make money. Given that they produce no games of their own, it makes sense that they are expanding and improving their suite of services in order to bring in more revenue.

At least that's my hope. Unity has been in a rocky place for a while now (straddling the line between what it is and what it wants to be) and I think news like this combined with the layoffs can lead many to wonder if Unity is still committed to making a world class game engine that can grow with them for years to come.

I agree, however I'm curious what the incentive for calling it a merge is? Is it part of the deal with ironSource?

Do they, for some reason think that merge sounds better then acquired? Because I'm in the camp that acquired would be more appealing.

Couldn't be any more vague if they tried.

There should be a similar isitraininginla.com

From the sounds of it Portland is to snow as L.A. is to rain. Any sign of the slightest of moisture in the air and Angelenos lose their shit and drive like dummies.

Couldn't you argue the person you would be pruning is a person that is most likely to appreciate you just as you are?

It seems reasonable to argue that if they are indeed in your social graph and they give you that advice, perhaps they like you for who you are and thus the advice at least from their perspective is good.