Utilitarianism, as well as "just good horse sense" suggests that finite resources should be allocated to solving problems that cause greater sum harm than lesser sum harm.
630 karma · joined October 15, 2012
Utilitarianism, as well as "just good horse sense" suggests that finite resources should be allocated to solving problems that cause greater sum harm than lesser sum harm.
They are. #27
Hosting your own, in your physical posession, with mercury-switch or dead-man-switch triggered thermite self-destruct is really the only option left.
It's not impossible.
I'd also have to question how it's even possible that any thinking human being, aware of even the barest modicum of facts, can continue to maintain that the police state is exclusively the domain of the GOP.
Jesus Christ, what has HN become?
Edit: Disregard this, I just checked the parent's karma score. Popularity goes a very long way in relegating petty things like posting guidelines and reason into the dustbin of irrelevance.
Four ways. The man has a wife and two children in whose lives he's quite active.
I strongly suspect he's managed to obviate the need for sleep.
TIL that death and/or dismemberment is an appropriate punishment for trolling.
Hahahahaha. No.
Why is the default assumption by Statists that if the government won't rule us, corporations will?
A novel concept that people may want to attempt to grasp is that there could be no rulers, and as such, there's no need to make up a fictitious "new ruler".
That's it. Consistent, heavy deadlifting has kept it away for years.
I have no medical explanation.
The fact that they're preselling the 16 core boards before we have even received ours, and that they come with storage( the contributors have to supply our own sd cards ) at the same price point, I'm left with an unpleasant taste.
Caveat: we're both dealing purely anecdotal evidence and a fair bit of conjecture. We could easily be wrong.
I think this is a very important observation. Sometimes poverty doesn't look anything like this.
I'd like to note that although I grew up in "technical" poverty, e.g. in a small rural community with a median income of $11,121, very few saw much violence or any of the markers of poverty lifestyle this article talks about.
Although my anecdote is not scientific, I do think this has much more to do with observed culture than with an arbitrary signifier like poverty. Urban poverty and rural poverty are entirely different things, for instance. As is transient and temporary versus chronic poverty.
You can lock up your data all you want, but with the NSA deeply embedded in telecoms and mobile device manufacturers, once you try to access said data in a manner consistent with the project's marketing, e.g. on an apple-engineered device running Verizon's comm middleware, the NSA gets your data anyway.
This is the same problem projects like Moxie's silent circle have. It's trivial for the authorities to grab data between the device's interface and the software - they don't need to decrypt a damn thing.
1. The surveillance occurs in secret
2. Due to #1, you can't possibly prove that you, specifically, are a target of surveillance
3. Due to #2, you have no standing with the court
QED. I am speechless.
"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me."
Is the self-esteem movement of subsequent generations really putting words on the same level as fists, knives, etc?